Jump to content

Recommended Posts

svcgoat

Pipefish

Monterey Formation

 

I found and collected this specimen myself and its unusually small.

 

Is it complete? Is it a juvenile? 

PXL_20230802_024237099.jpg

PXL_20230802_024247822.jpg

PXL_20230802_024242912.jpg

  • Enjoyed 11
Link to post
Share on other sites
connorp

Can't help, but very neat piece. Congrats.

  • Enjoyed 1
  • I Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Fossildude19

Definitely something from the Syngnathidae. Not sure if it is Syngnathus or Hippocampus sp.

It looks to me like the caudal fin (tail) is missing, and maybe the dorsal fin? Mostly complete.

 

It does look like a juvenile specimen to me.

 

Great fossil, by the way. Excellent find!  :)  :wub:


@rocket  @oilshale

  • I found this Informative 3
  • I Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

very nice and cool find!

This is Syngnathus avus (Jordan & Gilbert, 1919), rare but known from the Monterey-Formation of California

Congrets to this great fossil!

 

e.g. I add the paper, the original one is figured on plate 29, fig. 2, and described on page 35

the pic in the book is bad, but there are some nice ones in the net to compare

 

Fossil fishes of southern California (archive.org)

 

 

Jordan_Gilbert_Montereyfishes.pdf

Edited by rocket
  • I found this Informative 5
Link to post
Share on other sites
svcgoat

@rocket I actually have a few larger specimens but I've never seen one this small. Is this even more uncommon?

Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, svcgoat said:

@rocket I actually have a few larger specimens but I've never seen one this small. Is this even more uncommon?

 

I really do not know :eyeroll:, my personal opinion is that it is a mixture. Smaller ones are harder to see, so they come up more rarely. But, might be they are...

Perhaps a member reacts who know this site very well. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Fossildude19

I would say juveniles are a bit more rare than adult specimens.


Would love to see your other examples.  :)

  • Thank You 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
svcgoat
25 minutes ago, Fossildude19 said:

I would say juveniles are a bit more rare than adult specimens.


Would love to see your other examples.  :)

Here are my other recent finds.

PXL_20230802_163508645.jpg

PXL_20230802_163457803.jpg

PXL_20230802_163449995.jpg

PXL_20230802_163443204.jpg

PXL_20230802_163111734.jpg

PXL_20230802_163049577.jpg

  • Enjoyed 7
  • Thank You 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Fossildude19

Fantastic!  :default_faint:

  • Enjoyed 1
  • I Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
svcgoat

I have another one but when I coated it with paleobond the entire rock turned green. So I haven't coated the rest of them

Link to post
Share on other sites

really nice finds, I go to unpack my Estwing and come :look:

Link to post
Share on other sites
Tidgy's Dad

Very nice indeed. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Fossildude19

I tend not to treat my fossils with anything, unless I absolutely have to. I find that Art Fixative is usually enough if something is really powdery or crumbly.

I have no experience with any other consolidants, so unfortunately, I have no idea what happened in your case.

Maybe one of the other preppers will know?  @Ptychodus04  @jpc @RJB ??

  • I Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, svcgoat said:

Any idea why the entire piece turns green when I add the glue? @rocket @Fossildude19

 

think the idea of @Fossildude19 is the best, lets wait what the other prep-profis mention. Adding some glue or lasure is tricky, could do everything better or destroy...

Edited by rocket
Link to post
Share on other sites
svcgoat

I mean the fossil is still fine its just green I havent stabilized any of the others though because I prefer them to look as natural as possible

Link to post
Share on other sites
oilshale

Was it really Paleobond? Which grade was it? Is it a milky white liquid?
Some waterproof wood glues contain chromium salts as hardeners - these can lead to green discoloration

Edited by oilshale
  • I found this Informative 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
svcgoat

Yes paleobond I accidentally used the 750 adhesive 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Ptychodus04

Did you use the accelerant to speed the drying of the Paleobond? This will react with clays in a matrix to turn the specimen green. Give the green part a little bath of bleach water. This will usually remove the green tint.

 

I only consolidate with Paraloid B72 or Butvar B76 on dry specimens. It’s indefinitely stable and removable with acetone (if needed).

  • I found this Informative 3
  • Enjoyed 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
svcgoat
2 hours ago, Ptychodus04 said:

Did you use the accelerant to speed the drying of the Paleobond? This will react with clays in a matrix to turn the specimen green. Give the green part a little bath of bleach water. This will usually remove the green tint.

 

I only consolidate with Paraloid B72 or Butvar B76 on dry specimens. It’s indefinitely stable and removable with acetone (if needed).

Yup I used the accelerant 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Ptychodus04
9 hours ago, svcgoat said:

Yup I used the accelerant 


There’s the culprit. The bleach should take care of it.

  • I found this Informative 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

The accelerant will turn certain rock green.  I've never had a problem with just the super glue itself, only with accelerant and only with certain rock. 

 

RB

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
svcgoat

Thank you all for the good info!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...