Flashlight Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 Currently working on cataloging my fossil collection as best as I can, and am uncertain on this one. I don’t doubt the authenticity of the fossil itself or stated region based on other examples, but the “Spinosaurus sp.” given by the plate it came with feels awful presumptuous, so I’ve currently settled on a sweeping “Spinosauridae” classification. Does anything about this point to something more specific, or something more vague? Can provide more/better images if needed. Link to post Share on other sites
debivort Posted August 21 Share Posted August 21 @Tidgy's Dad may be able to help you with Moroccan material. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
jikohr Posted August 21 Share Posted August 21 It's a nice looking vert! Can we see more pictures? That and measurements like length, thickness, and height will help a lot. Link to post Share on other sites
Flashlight Posted August 22 Author Share Posted August 22 6 hours ago, jikohr said: It's a nice looking vert! Can we see more pictures? That and measurements like length, thickness, and height will help a lot. Thanks! Here's a few better pics with measurements: Link to post Share on other sites
Tidgy's Dad Posted August 22 Share Posted August 22 Well, I don't know what it is, but I do know that there isn't a Tegana Formation in the Kem Kem, or, indeed, anywhere in Morocco. Though it's a common enough mistake even in some published articles and papers. And the Kem Kem is Cenomanian which is Late Cretaceous. There isn't a Middle Cretaceous, though I get what they mean as the Cenomanian is sort of in the middle of the period, but it, coupled with an incorrect formation, suggests the label maker doesn't know his stuff. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now