<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Latest Images</title><link>https://www.thefossilforum.com/gallery/album/3316-texas-campanian-cretaceous/</link><description>Latest Images</description><language>en</language><item><title>Cretolamna sp.</title><link>https://www.thefossilforum.com/gallery/image/64017-cretolamna-sp/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	<em>Cretolamna sp</em>.
</p>

<p>
	Lower Campanian (Austin Chalk)
</p>

<p>
	Texas
</p>

<p>
	<a href='https://www.thefossilforum.com/gallery/image/64017-cretolamna-sp/' title='Cretolamna sp.'><img src='https://media.invisioncic.com/e327962/monthly_2025_04/large.IMG_4892.jpg.8aa37967c990b3cb67ed644e4b02d98a.jpg' title="Cretolamna sp." alt="Cretolamna sp."></a>
</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">64017</guid><pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2025 05:46:12 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Protosphyraena sp</title><link>https://www.thefossilforum.com/gallery/image/64016-protosphyraena-sp/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	<em>Protosphyraena sp</em>.
</p>

<p>
	lower Campanian
</p>

<p>
	Texas (upper Austin chalk)
</p>

<p>
	<a href='https://www.thefossilforum.com/gallery/image/64016-protosphyraena-sp/' title='Protosphyraena sp'><img src='https://media.invisioncic.com/e327962/monthly_2025_04/large.IMG_4895.jpg.f5990b0c2d0992467ec0de5f83218a95.jpg' title="Protosphyraena sp" alt="Protosphyraena sp"></a>
</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">64016</guid><pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2025 05:44:31 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Pachydiscus paulsoni</title><link>https://www.thefossilforum.com/gallery/image/63415-pachydiscus-paulsoni/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	<em>Pachydiscus paulsoni</em>
</p>

<p>
	Campanian (Pflugerville member of the Austin Chalk)
</p>

<p>
	Texas
</p>

<p>
	This is a taxon famous from the red beds in the <abbr title="North Sulphur River"><abbr title="North Sulphur River">NSR</abbr></abbr>, but I've been lucky to enjoy finding these hundreds of miles away in the Austin Chalk, stratigraphically below the Ozan red beds that are so famous for them.
</p>

<p>
	<a href='https://www.thefossilforum.com/gallery/image/63415-pachydiscus-paulsoni/' title='Pachydiscus paulsoni'><img src='https://media.invisioncic.com/e327962/monthly_2024_11/large.IMG_1427.jpg.34883bca75f990e7652b0614f5dd5e6e.jpg' title="Pachydiscus paulsoni" alt="Pachydiscus paulsoni"></a>
</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">63415</guid><pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2024 06:20:55 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>cf. Prognathodon sp.</title><link>https://www.thefossilforum.com/gallery/image/61545-cf-prognathodon-sp/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	cf. Prognathodon sp.
</p>

<p>
	Campanian (Ozan fm)
</p>

<p>
	Texas
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	I'm not the best with tooth ID's, since most of the mosasaur teeth I've seen in person come from basal Plioplatecarpines, whose teeth are mostly indistinguishable. But, realizing this broken apex from a much larger tooth lacked fine striations and had a faint anastomosing texture made me suspect a mosasaurine origin, as opposed to the most common large mosasaur from the Ozan - <em>Tylosaurus proriger</em>. <a contenteditable="false" data-ipshover="" data-ipshover-target="https://www.thefossilforum.com/profile/34008-pachy-pleuro-whatnot-odon/?do=hovercard" data-mentionid="34008" href="https://www.thefossilforum.com/profile/34008-pachy-pleuro-whatnot-odon/" rel="">@pachy-pleuro-whatnot-odon</a> was kind enough to walk me through the ID points and converged on indeterminate <em>Prognathodon sp</em>., and paleontologist Mike Polcyn gave the same opinion. Prognathodon is not described from the Ozan formation, making this an exciting find. There seems to be an elusive giant still lurking Texas's most iconic formation.
</p>

<p>
	<a href='https://www.thefossilforum.com/gallery/image/61545-cf-prognathodon-sp/' title='cf. Prognathodon sp.'><img src='https://media.invisioncic.com/e327962/monthly_2024_03/large_prog.jpg.aea2b995bad8ad4e0fb25d8f23db63b6.jpg' title="cf. Prognathodon sp." alt="cf. Prognathodon sp."></a>
</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">61545</guid><pubDate>Sun, 31 Mar 2024 20:42:55 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Cretolamna cf. sarcoporthea</title><link>https://www.thefossilforum.com/gallery/image/59678-cretolamna-cf-sarcoporthea/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	<em>Cretolamna cf. sarcoportheta</em>
</p>

<p>
	Campanian (Ozan fm)
</p>

<p>
	Texas
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	An uncommon genus for me to encounter, it was a pleasant surprise to see a Campanian example of the taxon.
</p>

<p>
	<a href='https://www.thefossilforum.com/gallery/image/59678-cretolamna-cf-sarcoporthea/' title='Cretolamna cf. sarcoporthea'><img src='https://media.invisioncic.com/e327962/monthly_2023_11/large_sarc.jpg.4f8b961416606c9798ece3529f41043c.jpg' title="Cretolamna cf. sarcoporthea" alt="Cretolamna cf. sarcoporthea"></a>
</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">59678</guid><pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2023 07:43:54 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Two Mosasaur caudal vertebrae</title><link>https://www.thefossilforum.com/gallery/image/59677-two-mosasaur-caudal-vertebrae/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	Two Mosasaur caudal vertebrae
</p>

<p>
	Campanian
</p>

<p>
	Texas
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	These two caudal vertebrae, found in the same stream, demonstrate some of the size variation seen in mosasaurs. Notice the two pits of the bottom vert - those are for the haemal arches, and with no other bony attachments except for the base of the neural spine (on the other side), we can infer that this vert came from close to the end of the tail, probably putting its owner in the 30+ foot range. Alternatively, though very worn, it seems that the smaller vert came from a position closer to the pelvis (though still caudal). Likely from a juvenile of what had to already have been a different, very small species. 
</p>

<p>
	<a href='https://www.thefossilforum.com/gallery/image/59677-two-mosasaur-caudal-vertebrae/' title='Two Mosasaur caudal vertebrae'><img src='https://media.invisioncic.com/e327962/monthly_2023_11/large.caudals.jpg.e9fe8e7beb7ece7b80d8e5aad462e628.jpg' title="Two Mosasaur caudal vertebrae" alt="Two Mosasaur caudal vertebrae"></a>
</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">59677</guid><pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2023 05:12:03 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Hadrodus cf. priscus</title><link>https://www.thefossilforum.com/gallery/image/59667-hadrodus-cf-priscus/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	Incisor in a portion of premaxilla from <em>Hadrodus cf. priscus.</em>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The teeth are not diagnostic to species, and current unpublished research has questions about the validity of certain species within the genus - not my place to discuss openly just yet <img alt=";)" data-emoticon="" height="20" src="//media.invisioncic.com/e327962/emoticons/default_wink.png" srcset="//media.invisioncic.com/e327962/emoticons/wink@2x.png 2x" title=";)" width="20" />
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Though I used to have this in my Santonian album, closer investigation of the geology of the site has led to a pretty conclusive lower Campanian age. Close the the Austin Chalk/ Ozan boundary
</p>

<p>
	<a href='https://www.thefossilforum.com/gallery/image/59667-hadrodus-cf-priscus/' title='Hadrodus cf. priscus'><img src='https://media.invisioncic.com/e327962/monthly_2023_11/large.hadrid.jpeg.543f0abe52563ad331adbe6d3fbad667.jpeg' title="Hadrodus cf. priscus" alt="Hadrodus cf. priscus"></a>
</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">59667</guid><pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2023 03:51:50 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>cf. Stereocidaris, with possible affinities to S. sceptrifera</title><link>https://www.thefossilforum.com/gallery/image/59662-cf-stereocidaris-with-possible-affinities-to-s-sceptrifera/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	cf. <em>Stereocidaris</em>, with possible affinities to <em>S. sceptrifera</em>
</p>

<p>
	Lowermost Campanian
</p>

<p>
	TX
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	This Cidarid seems to have affinities with <em>Stereocidaris sceptrifera</em> from the late Cretaceous of Europe, but the geographic separation and lack of literature on this new world form suggest a potential undescribed species of Stereocidarid. This is the same taxon as the other Cidarid in this album - both were found the same day, at the same locality <span><img alt=":)" data-emoticon="" height="20" src="//media.invisioncic.com/e327962/emoticons/default_smile.png" srcset="//media.invisioncic.com/e327962/emoticons/smile@2x.png 2x" title=":)" width="20" /> </span>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<span>Notice the partial aristotle's lantern (mouth), as well as a few of the short, flattened scrobicular spines (which protect the muscles of each primary spine) attached near the bottom. Though crushed, this specimen is excellent. </span>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<span>Huge thanks to <a contenteditable="false" data-ipshover="" data-ipshover-target="https://www.thefossilforum.com/profile/420-johnj/?do=hovercard" data-mentionid="420" href="https://www.thefossilforum.com/profile/420-johnj/" rel="">@JohnJ</a> for the excellent photos, and both John and <a contenteditable="false" data-ipshover="" data-ipshover-target="https://www.thefossilforum.com/profile/4550-ptychodus04/?do=hovercard" data-mentionid="4550" href="https://www.thefossilforum.com/profile/4550-ptychodus04/" rel="">@Ptychodus04</a> for the prep</span>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<span>Discovered April 1, 2022</span>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a href='https://www.thefossilforum.com/gallery/image/59662-cf-stereocidaris-with-possible-affinities-to-s-sceptrifera/' title='cf. Stereocidaris, with possible affinities to S. sceptrifera'><img src='https://media.invisioncic.com/e327962/monthly_2023_11/large.710201357_toothedpng.png.aac06c37e9d3585ba6b8bff819cd1549.png' title="cf. Stereocidaris, with possible affinities to S. sceptrifera" alt="cf. Stereocidaris, with possible affinities to S. sceptrifera"></a>
</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">59662</guid><pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2023 14:34:17 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>cf. Stereocidaris, with possible affinities to S. sceptrifera</title><link>https://www.thefossilforum.com/gallery/image/59661-cf-stereocidaris-with-possible-affinities-to-s-sceptrifera/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	cf. <em>Stereocidaris</em>, with possible affinities to <em>S. sceptrifera</em>
</p>

<p>
	Lowermost Campanian
</p>

<p>
	TX
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	This Cidarid seems to have affinities with <em>Stereocidaris sceptrifera</em> from the late Cretaceous of Europe, but the geographic separation and lack of literature on this new world form suggest a potential undescribed species of Stereocidarid. Huge thanks to <a contenteditable="false" data-ipshover="" data-ipshover-target="https://www.thefossilforum.com/profile/420-johnj/?do=hovercard" data-mentionid="420" href="https://www.thefossilforum.com/profile/420-johnj/" rel="">@JohnJ</a> for the ID tips and excellent photos and <a contenteditable="false" data-ipshover="" data-ipshover-target="https://www.thefossilforum.com/profile/4550-ptychodus04/?do=hovercard" data-mentionid="4550" href="https://www.thefossilforum.com/profile/4550-ptychodus04/" rel="">@Ptychodus04</a> for the prep.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Discovered April 1, 2022
</p>

<p>
	<a href='https://www.thefossilforum.com/gallery/image/59661-cf-stereocidaris-with-possible-affinities-to-s-sceptrifera/' title='cf. Stereocidaris, with possible affinities to S. sceptrifera'><img src='https://media.invisioncic.com/e327962/monthly_2023_11/large.145853298_pngcopy.png.72e4103c5c35f6a70854e55124428149.png' title="cf. Stereocidaris, with possible affinities to S. sceptrifera" alt="cf. Stereocidaris, with possible affinities to S. sceptrifera"></a>
</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">59661</guid><pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2023 14:26:54 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Tylosaurus cf. proriger</title><link>https://www.thefossilforum.com/gallery/image/58046-tylosaurus-cf-proriger/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	Tylosaurus cf. proriger
</p>

<p>
	Campanian
</p>

<p>
	Texas
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Ozan fm Tylosaur tooth found in gravel. I'm of the opinion that perhaps the assignment of T. proriger to the Ozan Tylosaurs is hasty - though it's difficult since the obvious differences between these and the holotype are restricted to a single cranial element. Not sure I should say much more on that - while it's not an existing research question it's not my original observation.
</p>

<p>
	<a href='https://www.thefossilforum.com/gallery/image/58046-tylosaurus-cf-proriger/' title='Tylosaurus cf. proriger'><img src='https://media.invisioncic.com/e327962/monthly_2023_04/large.1010596687_polish-save(13).JPG.a770ee8b49c56150f6933b9aff14f88c.JPG' title="Tylosaurus cf. proriger" alt="Tylosaurus cf. proriger"></a>
</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">58046</guid><pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 07:15:05 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
