Jump to content

tatehntr

Recommended Posts

Hi guys and gals,

 

Looking through some of my teeth from the past couple of trips and was looking to get an ID on this tooth. Is it a little meg? 

 

Thanks!

5b0b2500d2c14_5272018-5.thumb.jpeg.ab5da6dc35772ec2ee2c655fb360dfe9.jpeg5b0b250967816_5272018-6.thumb.jpeg.5fdf904897af9406115ba8cd0dc36f57.jpeg5b0b2511194c1_5272018-7.thumb.jpeg.18f53ddce91545a40b25e596a72562ae.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably, if it is thick. Big, worn Bullshark teeth are good dopplegangers, though.

"There has been an alarming increase in the number of things I know nothing about." - Ashleigh Ellwood Brilliant

“Try to learn something about everything and everything about something.” - Thomas Henry Huxley

>Paleontology is an evolving science.

>May your wonders never cease!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks quite thick. 

I think Meg. :)

Life's Good!

Tortoise Friend.

MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png.a47e14d65deb3f8b242019b3a81d8160-1.png.60b8b8c07f6fa194511f8b7cfb7cc190.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could see this being a wierd C. hastalis, but I think meg is more likely here.

“...whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being evolved.” ~ Charles Darwin

Happy hunting,

Mason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe that the tooth thickness and striation shape leans more to meg.

If you're a fossil nut from Palos Verdes, San Pedro, Redondo Beach, or Torrance, feel free to shoot me a PM!

 

 

Mosasaurus_hoffmannii_skull_schematic.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...