Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I got this from an expo today, it was collected in Gill MA and supposed to be Anomoepus. The rock is about 6 inches by 4 inches. I'm not remotely familiar with tracks so hoping someone here can verify it. Pictures are with and without flash, let me know if you need other angles or anything to ID. Thank you!

66015951_2327076327613525_9142570151395196928_n.jpg

66425457_666379080496466_7326457008536682496_n.jpg

66465734_2298673500381645_7844570106137935872_n.jpg

66478870_1456708934478396_7259455419934834688_n.jpg

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just judging from the photo, it's quite indistinct and it seems to be more the coloring which emphasizes the form than the form itself, if you know what I mean. If I were you, I'd take it to your nearest museum in the know to get the id confirmed.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Fossildude19

Not much of a track there, I'm afraid. :unsure: 

 

 

66015951_2327076327613525_9142570151395196928_n.jpg.f550dba641777b8bde3185180f51052b.jpg  66425457_666379080496466_7326457008536682496_n.jpg.68db3d1e89c872a947eca3de0a20631c.jpg

 

66465734_2298673500381645_7844570106137935872_n.jpg.7d1aaa0a2c5c0bc5248332aa7547e682.jpg  66478870_1456708934478396_7259455419934834688_n.jpg.c5310c60e7dc8f3dedbe7f078efbd173.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree not very distinctive with the last being the best.  Highlights due skew images.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably painted on. A quick run under water should confirm if that's the case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some times when we see prints they may be from a slightly lower layer of strata than what the critter originally stepped upon. Those layers below will be imprinted upon if they were still soft at the time,  but not as distinctly. And if they separate into thin enough layers when exposed later you might get several "layers" of prints.  You will also get a positive on the bottom side.  I suspect that is what you have here.

  • I found this Informative 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Mark Kmiecik
2 hours ago, erose said:

Some times when we see prints they may be from a slightly lower layer of strata than what the critter originally stepped upon. Those layers below will be imprinted upon if they were still soft at the time,  but not as distinctly. And if they separate into thin enough layers when exposed later you might get several "layers" of prints.  You will also get a positive on the bottom side.  I suspect that is what you have here.

But it should be similar in size and shape, mostly shape. This one does not have the same angles between the toes which would have to be the same even if the size and shape are not an exact match.

Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, erose said:

Some times when we see prints they may be from a slightly lower layer of strata than what the critter originally stepped upon. Those layers below will be imprinted upon if they were still soft at the time,  but not as distinctly. And if they separate into thin enough layers when exposed later you might get several "layers" of prints.  You will also get a positive on the bottom side.  I suspect that is what you have here.

This would be called an "undertrack":

https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/81050164.pdf

Might be...

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...