Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I stopped by a new road cut today to see if it would be a viable hunting spot. One of the things I found there was this interesting piece. Maybe an Ichnofossil?  Some type of burrow or feeding trails? According to the USGS map, the cut is Salem Limestone which is Upper Mississippian in age. Any ideas?

 

This small piece that I picked up came from a larger slab that was over a meter wide. The whole rock was covered in these and they are in between the layers. The big ones are only about 1cm across and most are half that. 

 

A photo from the field...

5e17bab993c7e_ichno(2).thumb.JPG.a6b397340a10d8b728c243e3fd31aea1.JPG

 

This is a picture of it wet...

 

5e17bab7bac20_ichno(1).JPG.6ac46565adaff3a98590e45ed7545b62.JPG

 

 

 

 

  • I found this Informative 2

The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it.  -Neil deGrasse Tyson

 

Everyone you will ever meet knows something you don't. -Bill Nye (The Science Guy)

Posted

That cannot be "random".  It must be ichnofossils.  The next question is further ID.  I'll see what I can find

Posted
43 minutes ago, grandpa said:

That cannot be "random".  It must be ichnofossils.  The next question is further ID.  I'll see what I can find

That was my way of thinking as well Tom. Thanks for taking a look! I'm digging around as well. Maybe we will come up with something. :) 

The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it.  -Neil deGrasse Tyson

 

Everyone you will ever meet knows something you don't. -Bill Nye (The Science Guy)

Posted

Compare with Helminthopsis isp:

 

image.thumb.png.15f359000be7726ac0b6156c4b68f929.png

figure from:

 

Martino, R.L. 1989

Trace fossils from marginal marine facies of the Kanawha Formation (Middle Pennsylvanian), West Virginia.

Journal of Paleontology, 63(4):389-403  PDF LINK

  • I found this Informative 3

image.png.a84de26dad44fb03836a743755df237c.png

Posted
6 minutes ago, piranha said:

Compare with Helminthopsis isp:

Thank you sir! I’ll read over the paper. They do look very similar to the picture you provided. :thumbsu:

The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it.  -Neil deGrasse Tyson

 

Everyone you will ever meet knows something you don't. -Bill Nye (The Science Guy)

Posted

Try the following:

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-540-47226-1_

And:

Southeastern Section - 63rd Annual Meeting (10–11 April 2014)

Paper No. 3

Presentation Time: 1:45 PM ESTUARINE ICHNOLOGY IN THE MISSISSIPPIAN HARTSELLE SANDSTONE OF ALABAMA

And:

Bioirrigation in Alph n. igen., arthropod cubichnia from the Mississippian Hartselle Sandstone of Alabama (USA)

Article (PDF Available)inGeodinamica Acta 28(1):1-19 · November 2015 with 314 Reads

DOI: 10.1080/09853111.2015.1108569

Abstract

Cubichnia from the Hartselle Sandstone, described as Rusophycus hartselleanus and herein renamed Alph hartselleanus n. igen., include specimens with well-defined, terminal cylindrical structures. We interpret these oblique shaft-like structures as having a respiratory function based on: (1) exact placement of cylindrical structures on the cubichnial axis; (2) unique sculpture with both transverse and longitudinal striation, absent elsewhere in the assemblage despite excellent preservation of trace fossils; (3) associated features in the trace such as bubbly structure that also could be caused by bioirrigation. Alph hartselleanus are much larger than known Carboniferous trilobites. While similar to Rusophycus, the Hartselle cubichnia have a complex morphology suggesting a crustacean tracemaker. The trace is quadrilobate, with distinct anterior and posterior regions. The posterior region has 5 or 6 pairs of coarse, obliquely transverse striae corresponding to digging appendages, crosscut by fine, obliquely longitudinal striae that may record bioirrigation. The anterior region has a bubbly structure suggestive of thixotropic movement of sand, again, possible evidence for bioirrigation. The axial shafts do not match known trilobite appendages, but could have been made by crustaceans. Were the cubichnia merely resting traces, or did they have additional functions such as nesting or protection during moulting? In a broader context, the physical evidence for bioirrigation represents a nearly untapped opportunity for understanding the Cambrian Substrate Revolution as well as Phanerozoic ecosystems. Where preserved, the apertures of burrows should be investigated for evidence of bioirrigation.

 

And:

 

image.png.50f8c3b8657bd682f754abf05d73c38d.png

  • I found this Informative 3
Posted

@grandpa

 

Thanks for the links and info! I’ll certainly give them a look over. :) 

  • I found this Informative 1

The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it.  -Neil deGrasse Tyson

 

Everyone you will ever meet knows something you don't. -Bill Nye (The Science Guy)

Posted
20 hours ago, grandpa said:

That cannot be "random". 

You mean the shrimp had a game plan? :default_rofl: I wonder if they had construction permits.

  • I found this Informative 2

 

 

Mark.

 

Fossil hunting is easy -- they don't run away when you shoot at them!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...