Jump to content

Moroccan Mosasaur ID


HunterLacrosse

Recommended Posts

hi

 

I recently wanted to find a Tylosaurid tooth from Morocco, but I'm confused about the tooth morphology of this ID. Because I found that some teeth described as Tylosaurid had very distinct protruding prisms (likes figure 3 and 4) on their crown surfaces, while some teeth were indeed relatively smooth (picture 1 and 2).

Which one is correct?

4.jpg

3.jpg

2.jpg

1.jpg

Edited by HunterLacrosse
error expression
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, HunterLacrosse said:

hi

 

I recently wanted to find a Tylosaurid tooth from Morocco, but I'm confused about the tooth morphology of this ID. Because I found that some teeth described as Tylosaurid had very distinct protruding prisms (likes figure 3 and 4) on their crown surfaces, while some teeth were indeed relatively smooth (picture 1 and 2).

Which one is correct?

4.jpg

3.jpg

2.jpg

1.jpg

If I understood correctly. You are looking for Tylosaurine from Morocco, species would be Hainosaurus boubker. It has different tooth morphology than Tylosaurus species.

  • Thank You 1

There's no such thing as too many teeth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, North said:

If I understood correctly. You are looking for Tylosaurine from Morocco, species would be Hainosaurus boubker. It has different tooth morphology than Tylosaurus species.

 

Exactly... There's a notable difference in tooth morphology between Tylosaurus and Hainosaurus. While it's been a point of contention in the scientific community whether the genera are synonymous, the teeth are one of the aspects that, at least to us, indicate that they're not.

  • I found this Informative 1
  • Enjoyed 1
  • Thank You 1

'There's nothing like millions of years of really frustrating trial and error to give a species moral fibre and, in some cases, backbone' -- Terry Pratchett

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/26/2024 at 8:13 PM, North said:

If I understood correctly. You are looking for Tylosaurine from Morocco, species would be Hainosaurus boubker. It has different tooth morphology than Tylosaurus species.

So, in Morocco, there doesn't have Tylosaurus species?

and some Tylosaurid teeth in here would belong to H. Boubker?

 

thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/26/2024 at 9:21 PM, pachy-pleuro-whatnot-odon said:

 

Exactly... There's a notable difference in tooth morphology between Tylosaurus and Hainosaurus. While it's been a point of contention in the scientific community whether the genera are synonymous, the teeth are one of the aspects that, at least to us, indicate that they're not.

can i know how to identify the teeth of these two species (Tylosaurus proriger and Hainosaurus bernardi)?

 

truly thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, HunterLacrosse said:

So, in Morocco, there doesn't have Tylosaurus species?

and some Tylosaurid teeth in here would belong to H. Boubker?

 

thanks

Yes.

I think there was time that H. boubker was not described yet.

  • Thank You 1

There's no such thing as too many teeth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hi there

 

In Morocco if the size of isolated tooth from Mosasaurus Hoffmannii is over 7 cm, it is still available to identify between M. hoffmannii and M.Beaugei?

i heard someone said that it is too hard to identify if the height of isolated tooth is bigger than 7 cm. because the prism faces will become more obvious in the lingual side. 

is that true? :zzzzscratchchin:

or is there any nice method that can help us to identify accurately?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, HunterLacrosse said:

hi there

 

In Morocco if the size of isolated tooth from Mosasaurus Hoffmannii is over 7 cm, it is still available to identify between M. hoffmannii and M.Beaugei?

i heard someone said that it is too hard to identify if the height of isolated tooth is bigger than 7 cm. because the prism faces will become more obvious in the lingual side. 

is that true? :zzzzscratchchin:

or is there any nice method that can help us to identify accurately?

 

I'm not sure whether the cut off point is indeed a hard 7cm. However, larger teeth seem to show less clear ornamentation in terms of prism faces and faceting, which makes it difficult to distinguish between Mosasaurus beaugei and Mosasaurus hoffmannii, as these are exactly the criteria to look out for...! Throw individual variation into the mix, and the picture muddles even further...

  • I found this Informative 1
  • Thank You 1

'There's nothing like millions of years of really frustrating trial and error to give a species moral fibre and, in some cases, backbone' -- Terry Pratchett

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pachy-pleuro-whatnot-odon said:

larger teeth seem to show less clear ornamentation in terms of prism faces and faceting

hello pachy

thanks for your reply.

I'm not sure if what I understand is correct.

you mean that the prism faces and faceting in the lingual side will become less obvious, if the size of isolated tooth is big enough? right?

 

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HunterLacrosse said:

you mean that the prism faces and faceting in the lingual side will become less obvious, if the size of isolated tooth is big enough? right?

 

Correct. Labial side too, though those would be prism faces rather than facets, which are found lingually in Mosasaurus.

  • I found this Informative 1
  • Thank You 1

'There's nothing like millions of years of really frustrating trial and error to give a species moral fibre and, in some cases, backbone' -- Terry Pratchett

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, pachy-pleuro-whatnot-odon said:

 

Correct. Labial side too, though those would be prism faces rather than facets, which are found lingually in Mosasaurus.

it's so sad....

if it's possible, can i have some images that show the differences in large teeth between Mosasaurus beaugei and Mosasaurus hoffmannii.

 

 

thanks, your help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, HunterLacrosse said:

it's so sad....

if it's possible, can i have some images that show the differences in large teeth between Mosasaurus beaugei and Mosasaurus hoffmannii.

 

Unfortunately, I don't have photographs of a large M. hoffmannii. However, here's a 7.5cm M. beaugei...

 

1259116581_Mosasaurusbeaugei7.5cmtoothwithanastomosingridglets01.thumb.jpg.765864edddd9190d24e567108bdcdc5b.jpg121530450_Mosasaurusbeaugei7.5cmtoothwithanastomosingridglets02.thumb.jpg.bf49038de715022b8fd4ab9e8286e2e5.jpg1122994119_Mosasaurusbeaugei7.5cmtoothwithanastomosingridglets03.thumb.jpg.35798b7bb8e2c820b636fa5fa26fdf49.jpg629339840_Mosasaurusbeaugei7.5cmtoothwithanastomosingridglets04.thumb.jpg.a3d70205d3b176b15e03ac648e789940.jpg1806515835_Mosasaurusbeaugei7.5cmtoothwithanastomosingridglets05.thumb.jpg.d24262c3574a2154749ba5a95507d96d.jpg

  • Thank You 1

'There's nothing like millions of years of really frustrating trial and error to give a species moral fibre and, in some cases, backbone' -- Terry Pratchett

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, pachy-pleuro-whatnot-odon said:

 

Unfortunately, I don't have photographs of a large M. hoffmannii. However, here's a 7.5cm M. beaugei...

 

1259116581_Mosasaurusbeaugei7.5cmtoothwithanastomosingridglets01.thumb.jpg.765864edddd9190d24e567108bdcdc5b.jpg121530450_Mosasaurusbeaugei7.5cmtoothwithanastomosingridglets02.thumb.jpg.bf49038de715022b8fd4ab9e8286e2e5.jpg1122994119_Mosasaurusbeaugei7.5cmtoothwithanastomosingridglets03.thumb.jpg.35798b7bb8e2c820b636fa5fa26fdf49.jpg629339840_Mosasaurusbeaugei7.5cmtoothwithanastomosingridglets04.thumb.jpg.a3d70205d3b176b15e03ac648e789940.jpg1806515835_Mosasaurusbeaugei7.5cmtoothwithanastomosingridglets05.thumb.jpg.d24262c3574a2154749ba5a95507d96d.jpg

ah, that's cool. 

Can I know the reason? i saw some M.Hoffmannii tooth with a big size are available to sell in certain web, Facebook or ins.

but in this forum, I don't see many people owning or will buy these large Hoffmannii teeth, which seems to suggest something.

Thanks, Pachy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, HunterLacrosse said:

ah, that's cool. 

Can I know the reason? i saw some M.Hoffmannii tooth with a big size are available to sell in certain web, Facebook or ins.

but in this forum, I don't see many people owning or will buy these large Hoffmannii teeth, which seems to suggest something.

 

All I think it tells you is that these large teeth are extremely expensive nowadays, and the risk of it turning out to be M. beaugei high...

'There's nothing like millions of years of really frustrating trial and error to give a species moral fibre and, in some cases, backbone' -- Terry Pratchett

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, HunterLacrosse said:

ah, that's cool. 

Can I know the reason? i saw some M.Hoffmannii tooth with a big size are available to sell in certain web, Facebook or ins.

but in this forum, I don't see many people owning or will buy these large Hoffmannii teeth, which seems to suggest something.

Thanks, Pachy

There is also lot of mislabeled ones.

I think I have seen potential M. hoffmannii ones only few times online.

  • I Agree 2

There's no such thing as too many teeth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i saw someone posted this video online and labeled it as M. Hoffmannii. the size is pretty huge at around 8 cm, and the condition is also really nice.

in my opinion, it is a mosasaurus sp. tooth, may belong to M.hoffmannii. 

however, I still prefer looking forward to your guys' suggestions.:zzzzscratchchin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, HunterLacrosse said:

i saw someone posted this video online and labeled it as M. Hoffmannii. the size is pretty huge at around 8 cm, and the condition is also really nice.

in my opinion, it is a mosasaurus sp. tooth, may belong to M.hoffmannii. 

however, I still prefer looking forward to your guys' suggestions.:zzzzscratchchin:

Location: Ouled Abdoun Fm., Morocco

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, HunterLacrosse said:

i saw someone posted this video online and labeled it as M. Hoffmannii. the size is pretty huge at around 8 cm, and the condition is also really nice.

in my opinion, it is a mosasaurus sp. tooth, may belong to M.hoffmannii. 

however, I still prefer looking forward to your guys' suggestions.:zzzzscratchchin:

 

A bit tricky due to the size and fact that this obfuscated prism faces and facets. At the same time, the way the light rolls across the labial side, suggests three, but probably four, prism faces, and, thereby, Mosasaurus beaugei.

  • Thank You 1

'There's nothing like millions of years of really frustrating trial and error to give a species moral fibre and, in some cases, backbone' -- Terry Pratchett

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, pachy-pleuro-whatnot-odon said:

Mosasaurus beaugei.

So, if the labial size contains four prism faces, it will belong to M.Beaugei? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, HunterLacrosse said:

So, if the labial size contains four prism faces, it will belong to M.Beaugei? 

 

M. hoffmannii has a maximum of three prism faces. So, yeah, that'd be correct. 

  • Thank You 1

'There's nothing like millions of years of really frustrating trial and error to give a species moral fibre and, in some cases, backbone' -- Terry Pratchett

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've split these out to their own discussion, as it was sidetracking a very informative topic.

These can be discussed independently of the other topic.

  • Thank You 2

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png    VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015       MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg        IPFOTM -- MAY - 2024   IPFOTM5.png.fb4f2a268e315c58c5980ed865b39e1f.png

_________________________________________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, HunterLacrosse said:

i saw someone posted this video online and labeled it as M. Hoffmannii. the size is pretty huge at around 8 cm, and the condition is also really nice.

in my opinion, it is a mosasaurus sp. tooth, may belong to M.hoffmannii. 

however, I still prefer looking forward to your guys' suggestions.:zzzzscratchchin:

I would be happy to have that kind of tooth in my collection.

But I actually really like M. beaugei and its prismatic teeth.

There's no such thing as too many teeth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, North said:

I would be happy to have that kind of tooth in my collection.

But I actually really like M. beaugei and its prismatic teeth.

yeah, I'm also interested in M.Beaugei and Tylosaurus proriger. Unfortunately, the teeth of Tylosaurus. proriger from Unit States are pretty rare, and i don't not how to identify. :DOH:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, HunterLacrosse said:

yeah, I'm also interested in M.Beaugei and Tylosaurus proriger. Unfortunately, the teeth of Tylosaurus. proriger from Unit States are pretty rare, and i don't not how to identify. :DOH:

If medium sized M. beaugei is allright, it should be relatively easy to find.

 

I have not seen Tylosaurus teeth on sale, but other members do own some. I think  hardest part is to find seller who could get them.

 

We just have to hope we have some luck someday.

  • I Agree 1

There's no such thing as too many teeth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 1/26/2024 at 4:21 AM, pachy-pleuro-whatnot-odon said:

Exactly... There's a notable difference in tooth morphology between Tylosaurus and Hainosaurus. While it's been a point of contention in the scientific community whether the genera are synonymous, the teeth are one of the aspects that, at least to us, indicate that they're not.

It ain't the community, it's just ONE researcher and his students. :eyeroll:

 

 

  • Enjoyed 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...