Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • New Members
Posted (edited)

Is this a shark tooth? I found it along the beach in Lincoln City, Oregon. It was the lowest tide of the year and I found it at the water’s edge. I wasn’t sure if it was a rock and I’m seeing something that’s not there or it’s a shark tooth. If it’s not, I think it sure looks

like one and I wonder what it would look like polished. 🤔

IMG_4277.jpeg

IMG_4278.jpeg

IMG_4279.jpeg

IMG_4280.jpeg

Edited by Raelinn
Forgot state
Posted

Sorry, not a shark tooth.  No enamel, root, or other characteristics of a tooth.

  • I Agree 3

Fin Lover

image.png.e69a5608098eeb4cd7d1fc5feb4dad1e.png image.png.e6c66193c1b85b1b775526eb958f72df.png image.png.65903ff624a908a6c80f4d36d6ff8260.png image.png.e69a5608098eeb4cd7d1fc5feb4dad1e.png

image.png.7cefa5ccc279142681efa4b7984dc6cb.png

Posted

Hello,

Sorry to disappoint, but this is definitely not a shark tooth of any kind.

 

No distinct features a shark tooth would show,  like enamel, texture, root structure, and a distinct shape and thickness.

Your piece also appears to be to short and thick for a shark tooth this size and shape.

 

Also, notice that your find consists of multiple rocks embedded in a piece of matrix (maybe man made concrete ?

A shark tooth would not have that, rather,  it consists of a root, and a crown, and sometimes of cusps.

 

For comparison : One of my shark teeth to show you the features of the more known shark teeth, (crusher shark teeth excluded !) 

 

Screenshot_2024-06-08-20-18-28-810_com.android.chrome-edit.thumb.jpg.ca15ec6d178f3f2f2df2acfc0ef7e063.jpg

Screenshot_2024-06-08-20-18-28-810_com.android.chrome-edit2.thumb.jpg.9ce9880ac52586ff7c60bac5306a7e6e.jpg

 

Rex : crown, showing distinct enamel texture and a very sharp edge

 

Blue : cusps

 

Green : root, boney structure, no enamel

 

No rocks embedded, not that thick and blunt, no enamel texture, or root structure.

 

Thats why its not a shark tooth, and just a rock :unsure:

 

  • I found this Informative 2
  • Enjoyed 1

My account and something about me :   

My still growing collection :

My paleoart :

 

I'm just a young guy who really loves fossils  YOUTH MEMBER2.jpg

Posted
7 minutes ago, Brevicollis said:

Blue : adjastment teeth

Interesting...that's terminology I've never heard before.  Often called cusplets or just cusps.

Fin Lover

image.png.e69a5608098eeb4cd7d1fc5feb4dad1e.png image.png.e6c66193c1b85b1b775526eb958f72df.png image.png.65903ff624a908a6c80f4d36d6ff8260.png image.png.e69a5608098eeb4cd7d1fc5feb4dad1e.png

image.png.7cefa5ccc279142681efa4b7984dc6cb.png

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Fin Lover said:

Interesting...that's terminology I've never heard before.  Often called cusplets or just cusps.

Well, looks like my Google translate made rubbish again, as I only know the german word for it. I didnt knew that there are scientific terms for these. I'll fix it.

Edited by Brevicollis
  • Enjoyed 1

My account and something about me :   

My still growing collection :

My paleoart :

 

I'm just a young guy who really loves fossils  YOUTH MEMBER2.jpg

Posted (edited)

@Brevicollis, just because I haven't heard a word doesn't mean it isn't real...people use words on here regularly that I have to Google.  :heartylaugh: But, Google isn't finding your word, so I thought it might be a translation thing.

Edited by Fin Lover
  • Enjoyed 1

Fin Lover

image.png.e69a5608098eeb4cd7d1fc5feb4dad1e.png image.png.e6c66193c1b85b1b775526eb958f72df.png image.png.65903ff624a908a6c80f4d36d6ff8260.png image.png.e69a5608098eeb4cd7d1fc5feb4dad1e.png

image.png.7cefa5ccc279142681efa4b7984dc6cb.png

Posted
9 minutes ago, Brevicollis said:

Well, looks like my Google translate made rubbish again, as I only know the german word for it. I didnt knew that there are scientific terms for these. I'll fix it.

 

I wouldn't worry. Details are often lost due to translation. I assure you, most of us knew what you meant.

  • I found this Informative 1

 

 

Mark.

 

Fossil hunting is easy -- they don't run away when you shoot at them!

  • New Members
Posted
1 hour ago, Brevicollis said:

Hello,

Sorry to dissapoint, but this is definetly not a shark tooth of any kind 

 

No distinct features a shark tooth would show like enamel texture, root structure, and a distinct shape and thickness. Your piece also appears to be to short and thick for a shark tooth this sice and shape.

 

Also, notice that your find consists of multiple rocks embedded in a piece of matrix (maybe man made concrete ?) ? A shark tooth would not have that, rather it consists of a root, and a crown, and sometimes of cusps

 

For comparison : one of my shark teeth to show you the features of the more known shark teeth, (crusher shark teeth excluded !) 

Screenshot_2024-06-08-20-18-28-810_com.android.chrome-edit.thumb.jpg.ca15ec6d178f3f2f2df2acfc0ef7e063.jpg

Screenshot_2024-06-08-20-18-28-810_com.android.chrome-edit2.thumb.jpg.9ce9880ac52586ff7c60bac5306a7e6e.jpg

 

Rex : crown, showing distinct enamel texture and a very sharp edge

 

Blue : cusps

 

Green : root, boney structure, no enamel

 

No rocks embedded, not that thick and blunt, no enamel texture, or root structure.

 

Thats why its not a shark tooth, and just a rock :unsure:

 

Thank you for elaborating. I had no idea so I saw the shape and thought it looked like a tooth. I appreciate the information.

  • Enjoyed 2
Posted
12 hours ago, Brevicollis said:

this size and shape.

Where did you see the size of the object under identification ? I can't see that.

 

Coco

----------------------
OUTIL POUR MESURER VOS FOSSILES : ici

Paréidolie : [url=https://www.thefossilforum.com/topic/144611-pareidolia-explanations-and-examples/#comment-1520032]here[/url]

Ma bibliothèque PDF 1 (Poissons et sélaciens récents & fossiles) : ici
Ma bibliothèque PDF 2 (Animaux vivants - sans poissons ni sélaciens) : ici
Mâchoires sélaciennes récentes : ici
Hétérodontiques et sélaciens : ici
Oeufs sélaciens récents : ici
Otolithes de poissons récents ! ici

Un Greg...

Badges-IPFOTH.jpg.f4a8635cda47a3cc506743a8aabce700.jpg Badges-MOTM.jpg.461001e1a9db5dc29ca1c07a041a1a86.jpg

 

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Coco said:

Where did you see the size of the object under identification ? I can't see that.

 

Coco

Well, have you ever seen a shark tooth this thick for its length ? This was what I meant.

 

I dont know the sice of that piece, but it appears like its way to thick compared to its length for any shark tooth (crusher shark teeth excluded)

Edited by Brevicollis

My account and something about me :   

My still growing collection :

My paleoart :

 

I'm just a young guy who really loves fossils  YOUTH MEMBER2.jpg

Posted (edited)

OK with you :Wink1: I asked the question because you talked about the size, it helps to get an idea and there I did not see it, as more and more often they are not indicated. But I was afraid to read badly...

 

Coco

Edited by Coco
  • Enjoyed 1

----------------------
OUTIL POUR MESURER VOS FOSSILES : ici

Paréidolie : [url=https://www.thefossilforum.com/topic/144611-pareidolia-explanations-and-examples/#comment-1520032]here[/url]

Ma bibliothèque PDF 1 (Poissons et sélaciens récents & fossiles) : ici
Ma bibliothèque PDF 2 (Animaux vivants - sans poissons ni sélaciens) : ici
Mâchoires sélaciennes récentes : ici
Hétérodontiques et sélaciens : ici
Oeufs sélaciens récents : ici
Otolithes de poissons récents ! ici

Un Greg...

Badges-IPFOTH.jpg.f4a8635cda47a3cc506743a8aabce700.jpg Badges-MOTM.jpg.461001e1a9db5dc29ca1c07a041a1a86.jpg

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...