Jump to content

HorribleImmortal

Recommended Posts

Found this a couple years back as well, have never figured out what it could be. Found in Nova Scotia, Canada. It’s about  2.4 inches long and 1.8 inches at its widest. It’s stumped a lot of my friends too.

IMG_8415.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any idea where in Nova Scotia? It's a pretty big island.

 

 

map_1979-004_200_cln.jpg


If this was found near other plant fossils, I would hazard a guess at some sort of Calamites fossil imprint.

 

If found near marine fossils, I would posit some sort of bivalve or brachiopod shell imprint.

  • I Agree 1

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png    VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015       MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg        IPFOTM -- MAY - 2024   IPFOTM5.png.fb4f2a268e315c58c5980ed865b39e1f.png

_________________________________________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Fossildude19 said:

Any idea where in Nova Scotia? It's a pretty big island.

 

 

map_1979-004_200_cln.jpg


If this was found near other plant fossils, I would hazard a guess at some sort of Calamites fossil imprint.

 

If found near marine fossils, I would posit some sort of bivalve or brachiopod shell imprint.

I’m not sure where honestly, it was a couple years ago

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like a Calamites node.

  • I Agree 3

Tarquin      image.png.b7b2dcb2ffdfe5c07423473150a7ac94.png  image.png.4828a96949a85749ee3c434f73975378.png  image.png.6354171cc9e762c1cfd2bf647445c36f.png  image.png.06d7471ec1c14daf7e161f6f50d5d717.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Location found is important  in the identification process, as we infer the geologic setting and stratigraphy  (formation, and age of strata) present in an area wherever the fossils are found.

It is always a good idea to make note of where things were picked up or found.

 

 

  • I Agree 3

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png    VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015       MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg        IPFOTM -- MAY - 2024   IPFOTM5.png.fb4f2a268e315c58c5980ed865b39e1f.png

_________________________________________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Fossildude19 said:

Location found is important  in the identification process, as we infer the geologic setting and stratigraphy  (formation, and age of strata) present in an area wherever the fossils are found.

It is always a good idea to make note of where things were picked up or found.

 

 

Because I normally roam beaches and the distance I am willing to drive, it could either be from the Northumberland Strait or St George’s Bay. But then again, this could be a piece I found while out with friends who have taken me to Halifax area and Windsor area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TqB said:

Looks like a Calamites node.

I can see it being a partial pith cast. Isn't the feature oriented wrong to be a node though?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Rockwood said:

I can see it being a partial pith cast. Isn't the feature oriented wrong to be a node though?

I think it's just a fragment on a projecting bit of matrix, the rest broken away to the left and right..

Edited by TqB
  • I found this Informative 1

Tarquin      image.png.b7b2dcb2ffdfe5c07423473150a7ac94.png  image.png.4828a96949a85749ee3c434f73975378.png  image.png.6354171cc9e762c1cfd2bf647445c36f.png  image.png.06d7471ec1c14daf7e161f6f50d5d717.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMG_8415.thumb.jpg

  • I found this Informative 1

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png    VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015       MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg        IPFOTM -- MAY - 2024   IPFOTM5.png.fb4f2a268e315c58c5980ed865b39e1f.png

_________________________________________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TqB said:

I think it's just a fragment on a projecting bit of matrix, the rest broken away to the left and right..

It's that broken look that keeps me from being convinced that this isn't just a crack in the casting. The separation should be a straight line. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oops. Ready fire aim. :shakehead: I see it often doesn't look straight in a pith cast. 

  • Enjoyed 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Rockwood said:

It's that broken look that keeps me from being convinced that this isn't just a crack in the casting. The separation should be a straight line. 

This sort of thing? From: 
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/calamites

 

Screenshot2024-09-19at07_30_06.png.75a4f6442c4d5adaeeb8f9cd7cb1bf98.png

  • I Agree 1

Tarquin      image.png.b7b2dcb2ffdfe5c07423473150a7ac94.png  image.png.4828a96949a85749ee3c434f73975378.png  image.png.6354171cc9e762c1cfd2bf647445c36f.png  image.png.06d7471ec1c14daf7e161f6f50d5d717.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It just happens that most of the examples in my collection have much cleaner lines, and I look at them straight on. I did an image search and quickly noticed that it's actually the exception. Especially a larger diameter cast viewed from an angle. :shrug:

  • Enjoyed 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Rockwood said:

It just happens that most of the examples in my collection have much cleaner lines, and I look at them straight on. I did an image search and quickly noticed that it's actually the exception. Especially a larger diameter cast viewed from an angle. :shrug:

So for someone who’s only just waking up from a 12 hour shift, what are we looking at here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:coffee:Subject in a sleep study?

It's a cast of the inside of a tree like horsetail ancestor from the Carboniferous period known as Calamites. The cavity is filled with pith in life. The feature seen here represents the tissue that divided segments of the stem. The growth habit had the selective advantage in that sections would separate before the plant was uprooted. The same habit can make weeding horsetails from a garden a perpetual chore.

  • Enjoyed 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Rockwood said:

:coffee:Subject in a sleep study?

It's a cast of the inside of a tree like horsetail ancestor from the Carboniferous period known as Calamites. The cavity is filled with pith in life. The feature seen here represents the tissue that divided segments of the stem. The growth habit had the selective advantage in that sections would separate before the plant was uprooted. The same habit can make weeding horsetails from a garden a perpetual chore.

Oh thats nifty! You sure do know your stuff. Thank you very much! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/18/2024 at 2:29 PM, Rockwood said:

Isn't the feature oriented wrong to be a node though?

 

Many Calamites nodes are larger in diameter than the stalk.

  • I found this Informative 1

 

 

Mark.

 

Fossil hunting is easy -- they don't run away when you shoot at them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Mark Kmiecik said:

 

Many Calamites nodes are larger in diameter than the stalk.

For comparison sake this is one of my 3d favorites that I have showing some extra distortion/distinction of some nodes and internodes...

 

I'm not sure if this is pre-burial/post-burial and compaction or maybe a little of each...

DistortedCalamites.thumb.jpg.d7af8ec494d99b1ab753f410275564de.jpg

Regards, Chris 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...