Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I’m pretty dang sure I found this in the Nashville group. Slight chance I found it near Ashland City/Warsaw and st Louis limestone- ish area. 

Thanks for any help at figuring out what this precious AKA Teet is. 
 

when I washed it I screwed it up a bit. The what looked to be laminae layers/wavy really did lighten up/wash away. I’ve gotta stop ruining my fossils with the hard scrubbing IMG_5874.thumb.jpeg.3191963d446a590435b87dd97c6ff619.jpegIMG_5861.thumb.jpeg.37d10f2a60b7e49b4ca15f64634084d0.jpegIMG_5862.thumb.jpeg.c7cfadd5011c470b8622e9f8598963a8.jpegIMG_5867.thumb.jpeg.f1cbe6fc59a52fc202bfb65c82da67d5.jpegIMG_5875.thumb.jpeg.c153d7d42a239ac3974f0f8cee61d28a.jpegIMG_5872.thumb.jpeg.ea6cf7c862b118db3b7695d23d30ba56.jpegIMG_5866.thumb.jpeg.4ec4a9be67596b9577af48c43667f32f.jpeg

Posted

I am not seeing anything immediately recognizable here.  :unsure:

 

My first guess is some sort of trace fossil, maybe like Conostichus, or Conichnus?    :shrug:

Second guess is concretion, but, not even sure of that.

Sorry I can't help further, ... maybe wait for other opinions.
 

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png    VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015    Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg  MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png  PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png    Screenshot_202410.jpg     IPFOTM -- MAY - 2024   IPFOTM5.png.fb4f2a268e315c58c5980ed865b39e1f.png

_________________________________________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Posted

Distribution of Conichnus and Amphorichnus in the Lower Paleozoic of Estonia (Baltica)
Olev VINN Mark A. WILSON Ursula TOOM

carnets de geologie 15  (size 1.1. mB)

 

I agree with Tim in that it is extremely hard just to judge from the pix alone what this could be

to put it poshly: it's morphology is distinctly equivocal

33524412.pdf

  • I found this Informative 1

 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...