Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I’m not really sure if this is geologic related or a leaf imprint. Found in Del Puerto Canyon, Eastern of Stanislaus County, California. Found in the Moreno Formation too. I found this specimen alongside many others but this one is the most visible or intact one. The lines on it are somewhat hard to see, if requested I can post more photos later.

IMG_9582.jpeg

IMG_9579.jpeg

Posted

An ID would be nice I guess but I’d like to know if it’s actually a leaf imprint or not, thank you.

Posted

Looks like it to me.

A more specific ID without a clear margin/edge of the leaf showing, would be quite difficult. 

 

 

And unfortunately, ... I'm not seeing a lot of material online in regards to identification of the leaves from that area.

  • I Agree 1

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png    VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015    Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg  MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png  PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png    Screenshot_202410.jpg     IPFOTM -- MAY - 2024   IPFOTM5.png.fb4f2a268e315c58c5980ed865b39e1f.png

_________________________________________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Posted

There is lots of interesting geology in Del Puerto Canyon including relatively unaltered pieces of the mantle with bright green olivine. Hopefully they won’t build a reservoir in that canyon.

 

https://geotripper.blogspot.com/2019/12/damning-del-puerto-canyon-geological.html?m=1#:~:text=It's nominally composed of basalt,dinosaur era%2C the Cretaceous Period.

 

https://geotripper.blogspot.com/2011/12/spending-day-in-earths-mantle-exploring.html?m=1

 

 

  • I found this Informative 2

My goal is to leave no stone or fossil unturned.   

See my Arizona Paleontology Guide    link  The best single resource for Arizona paleontology anywhere.       

Posted

 

Just now, DPS Ammonite said:

There is lots of interesting geology in Del Puerto Canyon including relatively unaltered pieces of the mantle with bright green olivine. Hopefully they won’t build a reservoir in that canyon.

 

https://geotripper.blogspot.com/2019/12/damning-del-puerto-canyon-geological.html?m=1#:~:text=It's nominally composed of basalt,dinosaur era%2C the Cretaceous Period.

 

https://geotripper.blogspot.com/2011/12/spending-day-in-earths-mantle-exploring.html?m=1

 

 

I hope not. It’s a really nice area there, nice creek which extends sort of long. 

Posted

I figured it wouldn’t be identifiable since there were probably a lot of different leaves there. Haven’t found good specimens yet, only good ones I’ve found are really soft and break easily. I’m hoping to go back there sometime this month.

Posted

There is a possibility by the looks of it, that this is relatively recent and has been formed under the influence of lime sinter (travertine).

 

Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger

http://www.steinkern.de/

Posted

I see.

Posted (edited)

Moreno Fm. Plant fossils

 

Here is the only website yet for ID of plant fossils from the Cretaceous to Paleocene rocks.

Edited by DPS Ammonite
  • I found this Informative 2

My goal is to leave no stone or fossil unturned.   

See my Arizona Paleontology Guide    link  The best single resource for Arizona paleontology anywhere.       

Posted

Ok. I'll take back my last statement now that I've studied the website.

  • I found this Informative 1

 

Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger

http://www.steinkern.de/

Posted

I will post more photos later.

  • Enjoyed 1
Posted

Lookslike yes, congratulations! 

YOUTH MEMBER2.jpg

Posted
17 hours ago, DPS Ammonite said:

Moreno Fm. Plant fossils

 

Here is the only website yet for ID of plant fossils from the Cretaceous to Paleocene rocks.

 

 

I saw no mention of Identification for the leaves. Only the pelecypods.

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png    VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015    Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg  MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png  PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png    Screenshot_202410.jpg     IPFOTM -- MAY - 2024   IPFOTM5.png.fb4f2a268e315c58c5980ed865b39e1f.png

_________________________________________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Posted
18 minutes ago, Fossildude19 said:

 

 

I saw no mention of Identification for the leaves. Only the pelecypods.


I probably should have said it showed plant fossils, modern looking leaves and listed plants found although it did picture and ID one conifer and gave a very general ID for a piece of wood. I agree that it is not helpful to ID the leaf of the OP; it just gives suggests of what it might be.

 

“Typical late Cretaceous plants one would expect to encounter include walnuts, oaks, figs, alders, laurels, and magnolias--a decidedly modern-appearing angiospermous association”

  • I found this Informative 1

My goal is to leave no stone or fossil unturned.   

See my Arizona Paleontology Guide    link  The best single resource for Arizona paleontology anywhere.       

Posted

Best ID for this is: Plant leaf, indet.

 

Unless better samples are obtained that show the leaf margin, stem, veining, etc.

 

 

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png    VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015    Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg  MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png  PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png    Screenshot_202410.jpg     IPFOTM -- MAY - 2024   IPFOTM5.png.fb4f2a268e315c58c5980ed865b39e1f.png

_________________________________________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Posted

Here is a great paper on the type locality of the Moreno Formation including fossil localities and lots of great maps. It also has information on overlying formations. This is what geologists and fossil hunters drool over. The big problem: what area have public access and what areas can be collected.
 


Payne, M.B., 1951, Type Moreno formation and overlying Eocene strata on the west side of the San Joaquin Valley, Fresno and Merced Counties, California: California Division of Mines Special Report, no. 9, 29 p., (incl. geologic map, scale 1:125,000)

 

https://ia800103.us.archive.org/23/items/typemorenoformat09payn/typemorenoformat09payn.pdf

My goal is to leave no stone or fossil unturned.   

See my Arizona Paleontology Guide    link  The best single resource for Arizona paleontology anywhere.       

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...