doushantuo Posted November 12 Posted November 12 Hi, and welcome Sorry to tell you this, but there is little here to identify. It's NOT a fossil
mighty micraster Posted November 12 Posted November 12 I beleive we need more photos, it could be a bivalve. 3
Ludwigia Posted November 12 Posted November 12 I'm also seeing some kind of bivalve. A precise location and also the stratigraphy if known would certainly help narrow this down for a possible identification. Also some more photographic views as already suggested. 1 Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger http://www.steinkern.de/
Fossildude19 Posted November 12 Posted November 12 +1 for bivalve. Location found and more pictures, please. Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 IPFOTM -- MAY - 2024 _________________________________________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now