Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • New Members
Posted

Might this be a ptychodus shark tooth?  It was found in Ostrander Gravel (presumed late Cretaceous) near Austin, Minnesota. 

 

 

IMG_0580.jpg

  • Enjoyed 1
Posted

I think further preparation would be required, but it doesn't look like Ptychodus to me.  :unsure:

  • I Agree 1

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

 

   VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png    VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015    Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg  MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png  PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png    Screenshot_202410.jpg     IPFOTM -- MAY - 2024   IPFOTM5.png.fb4f2a268e315c58c5980ed865b39e1f.png

_________________________________________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Posted

Very interesting, I did not know there were Cretaceous deposits in SE Minnesota! I agree, this needs to be prepped more to properly identify. Although I can see it potentially being a Ptychodus - if it’s viewed from the side and the occlusal ridge is in matrix.

Tym The Tooth Fairy

 

 

  • New Members
Posted

Does this initial prep help orient the tooth.  I believe it is a side view with the occlusal ridge across the top.   Thank you.IMG_0587.thumb.jpg.a5aa2aeb0ea0714767129b57d90e3cf7.jpg

  • Enjoyed 1
Posted

I don't think that is a Ptychodus tooth. Two straight sided bottom and right edges are not a features you would see on a Ptychodus. This could be an unusual clam or a fragment of another fossil. Also, the ridges are usually fairly uniform in spacing. These appear to have some irregularities.

  • I found this Informative 1
  • I Agree 1
Posted

I agree. This is starting to look like it might be a member of the Trigoniidae.

 

Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger

http://www.steinkern.de/

  • New Members
Posted
On 11/15/2024 at 2:16 AM, Ludwigia said:

I agree. This is starting to look like it might be a member of the Trigoniidae.

Good call.  I see it.  Thank you.

 

image.thumb.png.2ebcb26ea1d322fff9a4c267c9ecea94.png

 

  • Enjoyed 1
Posted

I think this is an interesting find worthy of further research. 

 

I can't help but still see a tooth of some sort. @Dan Wendt, are you able to take clearer pictures from different angles?

"I am glad I shall never be young without wild country to be young in. Of what avail are forty freedoms without a blank spot on the map?"  ~Aldo Leopold (1887-1948) 

 

New Mexico Museum of Natural History Bulletins    

 

point.thumb.jpg.e8c20b9cd1882c9813380ade830e1f32.jpg research.jpg.932a4c776c9696d3cf6133084c2d9a84.jpg  RPV.jpg.d17a6f3deca931bfdce34e2a5f29511d.jpg  SJB.jpg.f032e0b315b0e335acf103408a762803.jpg  butterfly.jpg.71c7cc456dfbbae76f15995f00b221ff.jpg  Htoad.jpg.3d40423ae4f226cfcc7e0aba3b331565.jpg  library.jpg.56c23fbd183a19af79384c4b8c431757.jpg  OIP.jpg.163d5efffd320f70f956e9a53f9cd7db.jpg

Posted

I tend to agree with Tim and Ludwigia

 

tffwebdteghopenacess0557.jpg

 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...