PaleoBlue Posted November 28, 2024 Posted November 28, 2024 Hello all, I am trying to decide between two fossils for my collection. Are these two fossils both authentic? And if so, which would you say looks better?
Ludwigia Posted November 28, 2024 Posted November 28, 2024 They both look real but the choice is up to you. Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger http://www.steinkern.de/
Fossildude19 Posted November 28, 2024 Posted November 28, 2024 First photo is not good enough to make a determination as to which looks better. Second one looks better in the current pictures, but the first one doesn't show the whole fossil from above. Impossible to determine with these photos. Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 IPFOTM -- MAY - 2024 _________________________________________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me
PaleoBlue Posted November 28, 2024 Author Posted November 28, 2024 5 hours ago, Fossildude19 said: First photo is not good enough to make a determination as to which looks better. Second one looks better in the current pictures, but the first one doesn't show the whole fossil from above. Impossible to determine with these photos. Yeah, i wish there were better photos but sadly the only other one was just a photo of it flipped over. I think I will go for the second one. It’s larger, much cheaper, and in my opinion it’s easier to tell what parts are what, especially for those who may not be as well versed in fossils and anatomy. Thank you so much for the reply!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now