Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm found a tooth unlike any of the others I have. Its kind of blunt and has a large root. I thought it was a Mako when I first found it but upon further examination I saw that both sides are serrated. Google lense says great white or megladon. I placed it next to a couple Mako teeth just so you can see the differences. Any help would be lovely. Thank you.

 

 

20241206_142310.thumb.jpg.c447b91dc88b8499a3721663df06c44e.jpg20241206_142257.thumb.jpg.42a5099d5012aa14200776a9683a37b8.jpg20241206_142330.thumb.jpg.725365d93532b796e61392b3d4ad9f83.jpg

17335134641822261400232197172135.jpg

Posted

I'm found a tooth unlike any of the others I have. Its kind of blunt and has a large root. I thought it was a Mako when I first found it but upon further examination I saw that both sides are serrated. Found in Rappahannock river.  Maybe 1" in size.Google lense says great white or megladon. I placed it next to a couple Mako teeth just so you can see the differences. Any help would be lovely. Thank you.

 

 

20241206_142310.thumb.jpg.c447b91dc88b8499a3721663df06c44e.jpg20241206_142257.thumb.jpg.42a5099d5012aa14200776a9683a37b8.jpg20241206_142330.thumb.jpg.725365d93532b796e61392b3d4ad9f83.jpg

20241206_133214.jpg

Posted (edited)

I think it is most likely a megalodon tooth that is missing some of the root. I don’t think it belongs to a mako shark or a white shark, however, it would be beneficial to see what others say.

Edited by NoahH

YOUTHMEMBER2.jpg.69daf4f514282504b65cf9aa9208e90c.jpg

Posted

I'm not seeing a bourlette.  I would guess Carcharhinus, but I don't know that area.  @Rowboater can probably help.

 

Also, the first two comparison teeth look like hastalis, which are no longer considered makos.  

  • I Agree 2

Fin Lover

image.png.e69a5608098eeb4cd7d1fc5feb4dad1e.png image.png.e6c66193c1b85b1b775526eb958f72df.png image.png.65903ff624a908a6c80f4d36d6ff8260.png image.png.e69a5608098eeb4cd7d1fc5feb4dad1e.png

image.png.7cefa5ccc279142681efa4b7984dc6cb.png

Posted
7 hours ago, Seven9 said:

I'm found a tooth unlike any of the others I have. Its kind of blunt and has a large root. I thought it was a Mako when I first found it but upon further examination I saw that both sides are serrated. Google lense says great white or megladon. I placed it next to a couple Mako teeth just so you can see the differences. Any help would be lovely. Thank you.

 

Ok,  I'll jump in..  Great Whites look like your Makos,  only add serrations..

 

Your tooth does suggest a Meg...  What is the size?  Sometimes large Carcharhinus leucas teeth resemble Megs because they are in the same shark Family. But , the obvious answer is a Meg.... 

Hunting tomorrow,  Hopefully another will confirm or refute.

The White Queen  ".... in her youth she could believe "six impossible things before breakfast"

Posted

TOPICS MERGED. 

One is plenty. ;)

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

 

   VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png    VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015    Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg  MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png  PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png    Screenshot_202410.jpg     IPFOTM -- MAY - 2024   IPFOTM5.png.fb4f2a268e315c58c5980ed865b39e1f.png

_________________________________________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Posted (edited)

Just for future reference, Google lens is not a reliable ID'ing tool.  The program only looks for superficial (and sometimes far-fetched) resemblances to other pics on the internet.  ;)

 

EDIT:  I should add, while some have used it as a starting point for their id'ing process, it's not a solid ID tool.  :)

Edited by Jaybot
  • I found this Informative 1

-Jay

Aspiring Naturalist

 

 

“The earth doesn't need new continents, but new men.”
―  Jules Verne, Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea

 

 

Posted (edited)
41 minutes ago, Jaybot said:

Google lens is not a reliable ID'ing tool. 


As of we don’t have enough problems with humans, now AI, Google lens, has pareidolia.

Edited by DPS Ammonite
  • Enjoyed 3
  • I Agree 2

My goal is to leave no stone or fossil unturned.   

See my Arizona Paleontology Guide    link  The best single resource for Arizona paleontology anywhere.       

Posted

This looks like a large Carcharhinus tooth. Size is important - what is the measurement on this tooth. Max size for Carcharhinus is about one inch.

  • I found this Informative 1
  • I Agree 4
Posted
1 hour ago, shark57 said:

This looks like a large Carcharhinus tooth. Size is important - what is the measurement on this tooth. Max size for Carcharhinus is about one inch.

Concur.

 

my opinion the tooth is an upper anterior Carcharhinus sp. Several species are possible. Wear prevents me from opining which. Candidates: dusky or Caribbean Reef, with a a lesser chance at it being a  bull as they’re not that prevalent in the fauna

  • I found this Informative 1

'Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.'

George Santayana

Posted

County location would help. The Rapp is quite long.

Posted
On 12/7/2024 at 2:52 AM, hemipristis said:

Concur.

 

my opinion the tooth is an upper anterior Carcharhinus sp. Several species are possible. Wear prevents me from opining which. Candidates: dusky or Caribbean Reef, with a a lesser chance at it being a  bull as they’re not that prevalent in the fauna

Id have to disagree with the Carcharhinus possibility.  It looks quite different than those. This was found in Northern neck of Rappahannock river. Much more rounded (blunt) and no angle at all. Very different from my bullshark, reef shark teeth.But again, I don't know, so it very well could be lol. I'm just here to learn and retain things as I go. I appreciate the feedback 🙏 Thank you.

Posted
On 12/10/2024 at 10:22 AM, automech said:

County location would help. The Rapp is quite long.

Northern neck

Posted

I'm not trying to be a buster. But, Northern Neck is the area between the Potomac and Rappahannock Rivers and contains 12 counties that border the Rapp. I/we wouldn't want exact GPS location. A county would help determine stratigraphy. I agree with @Fin Lover that @Rowboater could help out a little more since he navigates this river frequently.

Posted
On 12/15/2024 at 2:35 PM, Seven9 said:

Id have to disagree with the Carcharhinus possibility.  It looks quite different than those. This was found in Northern neck of Rappahannock river. Much more rounded (blunt) and no angle at all. Very different from my bullshark, reef shark teeth.But again, I don't know, so it very well could be lol. I'm just here to learn and retain things as I go. I appreciate the feedback 🙏 Thank you.

Respectfully disagree. Been studying Carcharhinus teeth for some time

'Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.'

George Santayana

Posted (edited)

Yes, @hemipristis knows Carcharhinus better than just about anyone else here.  I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss it.  

Edited by Fin Lover

Fin Lover

image.png.e69a5608098eeb4cd7d1fc5feb4dad1e.png image.png.e6c66193c1b85b1b775526eb958f72df.png image.png.65903ff624a908a6c80f4d36d6ff8260.png image.png.e69a5608098eeb4cd7d1fc5feb4dad1e.png

image.png.7cefa5ccc279142681efa4b7984dc6cb.png

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...