New Members David Renaud Posted October 30, 2019 New Members Posted October 30, 2019 I have a large assortment of various Marine and Flying Reptile fossils. Here is a sample.. 1) pair of undetermined fossil heads 2)
Randyw Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 I’m sorry but all I’m seeing is geologic not fossil...
Rockwood Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 Agreed. I see nothing to indicate it's being fossil bone.
Fossildude19 Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 Sorry, but I am not seeing any fossils here. I agree, these look like geologic oddities. I see no bone texture or skull morphology to indicate these are the heads of anything. Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 IPFOTM -- MAY - 2024 _________________________________________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me
New Members David Renaud Posted October 30, 2019 Author New Members Posted October 30, 2019 Fellas please look again- These are not skulls rather heads. They come from saturated zones and never decomposed.
Kane Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 5 minutes ago, David Renaud said: Fellas please look again- These are not skulls rather heads. They come from saturated zones and never decomposed. If that were the case, it would not be a fossil, but something recent. Fossils are the result of decomposition and generally replacement by minerals (exceptions include fossils in amber, and sea shells that may retain their nacre under certain conditions). Only in extremely specific conditions can soft parts retain their appearance, and these are still the process of mineralization, and generally occur in Konservat-Lagerstatte zones. However, in this case and as stated above, there is no distinct morphology to state that these are heads or skulls. There is no symmetry, and no resemblance to heads in these globular masses. ...How to Philosophize with a Hammer
New Members David Renaud Posted October 30, 2019 Author New Members Posted October 30, 2019 This is dumb how do I send a picture? cant it just be simple? not everyone has all day to figure it out. how about it?
Kane Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 In the reply field, click on "choose files" (to the right of the paperclip icon at the bottom of the text-entry field). It should be the same process you followed to post your initial images. ...How to Philosophize with a Hammer
Fossildude19 Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 25 minutes ago, David Renaud said: Fellas please look again- These are not skulls rather heads. They come from saturated zones and never decomposed. As stated, that would be an incredibly rare occurrence. I don't see any symmetry either, or anything that would indicate these were once living things. I don't understand what you mean by "saturated zones", but most fossils were buried by floods or oceanic events. Where (country, state, county city?) were these found? Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 IPFOTM -- MAY - 2024 _________________________________________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me
El_Hueso Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 Very cool and unique looking rocks. I would love to have one as a fireplace mantel piece or decoration but there is nothing at all that indicates that these are fossils. 2
Auspex Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 Your specimens do not have an organic origin; they are sedimentary geologic oddities. You don't have to take our word for it; contact a natural history museum in your area, and let a scientist look at them. He can explain exactly what they are and how they formed. "There has been an alarming increase in the number of things I know nothing about." - Ashleigh Ellwood Brilliant “Try to learn something about everything and everything about something.” - Thomas Henry Huxley >Paleontology is an evolving science. >May your wonders never cease!
facehugger Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 Kinds looks like an iron concretion to me. +1 for geologic, non-fossil specimen. And why wouldn't organics decompose in a "saturated" zone? I was under the impression that sort of preservation would only occur in extremely dry areas, like arctic or dessert...
jpc Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 Hey... I work in a fossil museum...maybe not in your area, but I agree with the others...no fossils aqui.
Rockwood Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 2 hours ago, David Renaud said: Fellas please look again- These are not skulls rather heads. They come from saturated zones and never decomposed. There are indeed fossils which are preserved in unconsolidated, oxygen deprived sediments. A head preserved that way would most likely be a more gruesome site if any of the flesh survived. 1
Mark Kmiecik Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 Looks a lot like native copper nuggets, or if it's the lighting, some sort of slag. 1 Mark. Fossil hunting is easy -- they don't run away when you shoot at them!
Ludwigia Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 As they say, 2 heads are better than one. 2 Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger http://www.steinkern.de/
El_Hueso Posted October 31, 2019 Posted October 31, 2019 I'm honestly interested in seeing more pictures... 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now