Al Dente Posted February 25 Nice tooth, looks more like Galeocerdo aduncus than G. cuvier. Link to comment
RAlves Posted February 28 On 2/25/2021 at 11:51 PM, Al Dente said: Nice tooth, looks more like Galeocerdo aduncus than G. cuvier. Thanks @Al Dente! Doesn't the existence of secondary serrations correspond to the G. cuvier? Link to comment
Al Dente Posted February 28 Some aduncus have secondary serrations. Here an example from Brett Breakin’ Rocks album http://www.thefossilforum.com/index.php?/gallery/image/47255-galeocerdo-aduncus-01/ The earliest G. cuvier that I’m aware of are from the Pliocene. Link to comment
RAlves Posted March 1 10 hours ago, Al Dente said: Some aduncus have secondary serrations. Here an example from Brett Breakin’ Rocks album http://www.thefossilforum.com/index.php?/gallery/image/47255-galeocerdo-aduncus-01/ The earliest G. cuvier that I’m aware of are from the Pliocene. The formation where I found it is Miocene. How to spot the differences between the two? Link to comment
Al Dente Posted March 2 Size is a big difference. G. cuvier are much larger and thicker. Here are some from the Lee Creek mine. The aduncus are on the right and the width are from 1.5 to around 1.9 cm. The G. cuvier are on the left and the width is around 2.5 to 3 cm. The outline of the teeth are a little different too. 2 Link to comment
Recommended Comments