Carl Posted November 24, 2009 Share Posted November 24, 2009 but hang on. i mean, ya'll may well be onto the right answer. but what's weird about the specimen in question, if those are coprolites, is the uniformity of them. they all seem almost exactly the same length and diameter, and the ends are rounded just so. the comparative material posted has much greater variance between individual poops. True, the comparative material posted has more variation in size. They are both examples of invertebrate coprolite masses, just clearly different species. Whatever made the coprolites in the original post must've made them in a very orderly fashion, like deer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Posted November 24, 2009 Share Posted November 24, 2009 Looking at my first picture a little closer... it looks like there is quite a bit of variation in my stool sample. Maybe slightly different critters? A couple small pieces seem to have the rounded edges like Daryl's specimen. Now THESE look much more like callianassid coprolites. They have the rod shape with the broken ends perpendiclar to the long axis. The one on top is especially convincing because the lengthwise section shows the canals. Very nice examples! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auspex Posted November 24, 2009 Share Posted November 24, 2009 These are details undreamed of by me! Thank you for lighting a candle in the dark room of my knowledge "There has been an alarming increase in the number of things I know nothing about." - Ashleigh Ellwood Brilliant “Try to learn something about everything and everything about something.” - Thomas Henry Huxley >Paleontology is an evolving science. >May your wonders never cease! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
non-remanié Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 (edited) Thanks for the detailed information Carl. Interestingly, one of my pieces has some chitinous material attached to the coprolite/matrix mass. Its just a small patch, way too small for me to make an ID from, but I suppose it could be associated. Also I was going to comment on the phosphate preservation of the original specimen not jiving with a burrow (at least in my limited amateur experience) but then I remembered I just found this piece which sure looks like a phosphatic burrow to me. What do you think? .5" wide associated? Edited November 25, 2009 by toothpuller ---Wie Wasser schleift den Stein, wir steigen und fallen--- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erose Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 Ophiomorpha are interesting in that it reflects as much about the sediment as the critter. At Big Brook you can go upstream and see another type of burrow called Thallianasoids (SP?) that is also made by Callianasid shrimp. But those are smooth sided. The sediment didn't need reinforcing with agglutinated pellets. In a few formations here in Texas we find a burrow called Spongeliomorpha which clearly shows longitudinal scratch marks where the critter dug through the sediment. These are also believed to be made by Callianasids. Carl, you still in NYC? Send me a PM e-mail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 (edited) Thanks for the detailed information Carl. Interestingly, one of my pieces has some chitinous material attached to the coprolite/matrix mass. Its just a small patch, way too small for me to make an ID from, but I suppose it could be associated. Also I was going to comment on the phosphate preservation of the original specimen not jiving with a burrow (at least in my limited amateur experience) but then I remembered I just found this piece which sure looks like a phosphatic burrow to me. What do you think? .5" wide associated? I realized after writing that that saying they're never phosphatic was probably too strong a wording. As any of us fossil dweebs knows, practically anything is possible in the fossil record. I do think that the first and second pictures just posted are of a burrow, and, indeed, it looks fairly phosphatic. Edited November 25, 2009 by Carl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 Ophiomorpha are interesting in that it reflects as much about the sediment as the critter. At Big Brook you can go upstream and see another type of burrow called Thallianasoids (SP?) that is also made by Callianasid shrimp. But those are smooth sided. The sediment didn't need reinforcing with agglutinated pellets. In a few formations here in Texas we find a burrow called Spongeliomorpha which clearly shows longitudinal scratch marks where the critter dug through the sediment. These are also believed to be made by Callianasids. Carl, you still in NYC? Send me a PM e-mail. Doc! I don't have your current email. You know how to find me, right? Same place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Smilodon Posted December 1, 2009 Share Posted December 1, 2009 Don, you could check the fossil against the description of Halyminites major in the Horace Richards 1958 monograph (Part I, Page 42, Plate 9). It's a form taxon for burrows, and your specimen generally resembles the ones illustrated, although it is small and the markings somewhat differently arranged. I've seen a number of them over the years, but they are not so common as the text seems to indicate. From Dave Parris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haddy Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 Here's my example from Monmouth County, NJ: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 Now THAT'S a spot on Ophiomorpha burrow (once called Halymenites)! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redlichia Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 Or is a type of Ophiomorpha sp.,or is a nodule of ematite mineral? ->>>>> < Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now