Sacha Posted February 26, 2020 Share Posted February 26, 2020 Went to the Peace River yesterday to beat the cold front and rain for a very pleasant 85 degree day of digging with friends. My streak of poor performance continues but I found one item I thought might be of interest. First, the take for the day: Now in December of 2016 I found a small meg tooth that @MarcoSr identified as a meg symphyseal tooth, which Tony @ynot picked up at auction. This little tooth looks quite similar to me, but has a somewhat shorter blade. Is it another symphyseal tooth, or just an ordinary posterior? I may need to get a better picture of it. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ynot Posted February 26, 2020 Share Posted February 26, 2020 Nice tooth, but it looks posterior to Me. 1 Darwin said: " Man sprang from monkeys." Will Rogers said: " Some of them didn't spring far enough." My Fossil collection - My Mineral collection My favorite thread on TFF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plax Posted February 26, 2020 Share Posted February 26, 2020 amazing how much the third one from the left in the top row looks like a squalicorax. An impossibility of course but a good example of provenance disproving a possibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacha Posted February 26, 2020 Author Share Posted February 26, 2020 Here's a better picture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Searcher78 Posted February 26, 2020 Share Posted February 26, 2020 I always assume the little ones are the back teeth, but I could be wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarcoSr Posted February 26, 2020 Share Posted February 26, 2020 3 hours ago, Sacha said: Now in December of 2016 I found a small meg tooth that @MarcoSr identified as a meg symphyseal tooth, which Tony @ynot picked up at auction. This little tooth looks quite similar to me, but has a somewhat shorter blade. Is it another symphyseal tooth, or just an ordinary posterior? I may need to get a better picture of it. 2 hours ago, Sacha said: Here's a better picture. Nice tooth but definitely a posterior tooth. EDIT: Here is a picture of a meg symphyseal tooth (.63"): Marco Sr. 4 "Any day that you can fossil hunt is a great day." My family fossil website Some Of My Shark, Ray, Fish And Other Micros My Extant Shark Jaw Collection Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Searcher78 Posted February 26, 2020 Share Posted February 26, 2020 1 hour ago, MarcoSr said: Nice tooth but definitely a posterior tooth. EDIT: Here is a picture of a meg symphyseal tooth (.63"): Marco Sr. Nice! The enamel goes down the side of the root. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacha Posted February 26, 2020 Author Share Posted February 26, 2020 I see the difference. Here is a picture of the one I was referencing, that Tony has now, and the enamel does extend further on one side than the other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shellseeker Posted February 26, 2020 Share Posted February 26, 2020 John, Glad you go out...it was a gorgeous day.. I am thinking that we found about the same items on my last trip... I got a horse ear bone and a dolphin tooth, plus 1 decent Meg , the rest broke up. Years back , we went hunting in March mania, and I found this one of my favorites. In all my years I have never found a Meg symphyseal... Finding a tiny posterior is tough enough. Would love to pick up 2-3 more.... The White Queen ".... in her youth she could believe "six impossible things before breakfast" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siteseer Posted February 27, 2020 Share Posted February 27, 2020 9 hours ago, Sacha said: I see the difference. Here is a picture of the one I was referencing, that Tony has now, and the enamel does extend further on one side than the other. It's more the shape of the root that indicates a symphyseal though it isn't always the same shape. In a posterior the root lobes are spread out and the crown is low. In a symphyseal the crown can be a little higher and the root can be a little higher. The lobes are somewhat pointed and constricted laterally (mesiodistally). Symphyseals are always irregular. They're rare because very few individuals would have that file by the Late Miocene. Dentitions in a lineage become more efficient over time, doing the same work (or more work) with fewer teeth. That frees up energy for elsewhere in the body. The symphyseal file doesn't appear to be common even in its rather distant ancestor, Otodus obliquus. An ancestor of Otodus must have had at least one symphyseal file as part of its normal dentition. Jess 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarcoSr Posted February 27, 2020 Share Posted February 27, 2020 9 hours ago, siteseer said: The symphyseal file doesn't appear to be common even in its rather distant ancestor, Otodus obliquus. An ancestor of Otodus must have had at least one symphyseal file as part of its normal dentition. Jess Jess Below are pictures of two Otodus symphyseals from the Eocene of Virginia collected by a good friend of mine. Daryl took the pictures. They were found in situ relatively close to each other. We believe that they are associated because of their close proximity in the formation and the fact that Otodus teeth are not common at all from the formation. I've found five total and my friend around eight total including these two in over twenty years of collecting. From the slant of the crowns it looks like this shark had at least two symphyseal files. Marco Sr. 1 "Any day that you can fossil hunt is a great day." My family fossil website Some Of My Shark, Ray, Fish And Other Micros My Extant Shark Jaw Collection Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siteseer Posted February 29, 2020 Share Posted February 29, 2020 On 2/27/2020 at 6:01 AM, MarcoSr said: Jess Below are pictures of two Otodus symphyseals from the Eocene of Virginia collected by a good friend of mine. Daryl took the pictures. They were found in situ relatively close to each other. We believe that they are associated because of their close proximity in the formation and the fact that Otodus teeth are not common at all from the formation. I've found five total and my friend around eight total including these two in over twenty years of collecting. From the slant of the crowns it looks like this shark had at least two symphyseal files. Marco Sr. Marco Sr., Wow, great finds. After all my Tucson trips and talking to collectors, I don't see too many from the Ypresian of Morocco either. I think I have just two of those. Jess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarcoSr Posted February 29, 2020 Share Posted February 29, 2020 12 hours ago, siteseer said: Marco Sr., Wow, great finds. After all my Tucson trips and talking to collectors, I don't see too many from the Ypresian of Morocco either. I think I have just two of those. Jess Jess I rarely purchase fossils but I have bought two Otodus Obliquus symphyseals and one Otodus sokolovi symphyseal from Morocco from a good friend who is a fossil dealer. I was really surprised by a facebook post by Dr. David Ward a few years back where he showed a picture of over a 100 Otodus obliquus symphyseals that he had. If you go to Morocco itself, you can probably get a good number of the rarer shark teeth that don't make it out in the general market. I have a friend from Belgium who bought a number of really rare Moroccan teeth directly from mine workers and local Moroccan dealers when he was in Morocco on fossil hunting trips years ago. Trying to buy directly from the mine workers today when they get off the buses leaving the mines would probably get you in big trouble with the big dealers who now control most of that trade. Marco Sr. "Any day that you can fossil hunt is a great day." My family fossil website Some Of My Shark, Ray, Fish And Other Micros My Extant Shark Jaw Collection Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siteseer Posted February 29, 2020 Share Posted February 29, 2020 3 hours ago, MarcoSr said: Jess I rarely purchase fossils but I have bought two Otodus Obliquus symphyseals and one Otodus sokolovi symphyseal from Morocco from a good friend who is a fossil dealer. I was really surprised by a facebook post by Dr. David Ward a few years back where he showed a picture of over a 100 Otodus obliquus symphyseals that he had. If you go to Morocco itself, you can probably get a good number of the rarer shark teeth that don't make it out in the general market. I have a friend from Belgium who bought a number of really rare Moroccan teeth directly from mine workers and local Moroccan dealers when he was in Morocco on fossil hunting trips years ago. Trying to buy directly from the mine workers today when they get off the buses leaving the mines would probably get you in big trouble with the big dealers who now control most of that trade. Marco Sr. Marco Sr., A few years ago, I was talking to David at Tucson about pathological teeth from Morocco.. He said pretty much the same thing about those, having numerous examples of those too. I don't know if he still goes there but I assume he's done some collecting in all the phosphate layers and probably other deposits in the region as well. Jess 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now