Dinobot Posted April 7, 2020 Share Posted April 7, 2020 Hi all this may be a dumb question or too complex for a simple answer, but what factors determine if a bunch of fossils found in very very close proximity are actually the contents of a dinosaurs stomach? Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordTrilobite Posted April 7, 2020 Share Posted April 7, 2020 Well one thing that can make a difference is if there's evidence of acid etching on bone. If there's acid etching there's a higher chance it was eaten. 4 Olof Moleman AKA Lord Trilobite Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troodon Posted April 7, 2020 Share Posted April 7, 2020 Also, proximity is very important and if bones are present they would be broken fragments, probably not recognizable with very different preservation than the skeleton. Ultra rare but the most common stomach content found are Gastroliths which are rounded stones found near the skeleton and different than other rocks in the surrounding area. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troodon Posted April 7, 2020 Share Posted April 7, 2020 Let me add you periodically see digested theropod teeth for sale. Most are just poorly preserved ones. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinobot Posted April 7, 2020 Author Share Posted April 7, 2020 4 hours ago, LordTrilobite said: Well one thing that can make a difference is if there's evidence of acid etching on bone. If there's acid etching there's a higher chance it was eaten. Ok thanks! what does acid etching on bone look like? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinobot Posted April 7, 2020 Author Share Posted April 7, 2020 3 hours ago, Troodon said: Also, proximity is very important and if bones are present they would be broken fragments, probably not recognizable with very different preservation than the skeleton. Ultra rare but the most common stomach content found are Gastroliths which are rounded stones found near the skeleton and different than other rocks in the surrounding area. So if there are multiple unidentifiable bones in close proximity but there is not skeleton found surrounding it or near would it just be a bunch of bones? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troodon Posted April 7, 2020 Share Posted April 7, 2020 Well if the preservation of the bones look like the skeleton yes just a bunch of bones. Also remember the theropod is going after the meat and any bones it ingest are fragments 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinobot Posted April 7, 2020 Author Share Posted April 7, 2020 Ok thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinobot Posted April 7, 2020 Author Share Posted April 7, 2020 1 hour ago, Troodon said: Well if the preservation of the bones look like the skeleton yes just a bunch of bones. Also remember the theropod is going after the meat and any bones it ingest are fragments so I found this item for sale, and it looks to a bunch of fragmented bones in close proximity, would this possibly be stomach contents? the seller said it was a partial dino rib, mammal toe and some other fragments pieces. What would I be looking for in a piece like this to determine one way or another? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troodon Posted April 7, 2020 Share Posted April 7, 2020 I have a hard time seeing that larger bone would getting through its esophagus and into stomach. Looks like a typical matrix block. Bones look normal. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aplomado Posted April 7, 2020 Share Posted April 7, 2020 Neat looking fossil, in any case! I love matrix like that. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinobot Posted April 7, 2020 Author Share Posted April 7, 2020 25 minutes ago, Troodon said: I have a hard time seeing that larger bone would getting through its esophagus and into stomach. Looks like a normal matrix block. Bones look normal. Ok thank you just didnt want to buy it and start taking it apart if it was possibly stomach contents! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dracarys Posted April 7, 2020 Share Posted April 7, 2020 Is it more likely to be section of a channel deposit where bones had collected? Can’t see this as stomach contents. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinobot Posted April 7, 2020 Author Share Posted April 7, 2020 1 hour ago, Dracarys said: Is it more likely to be section of a channel deposit where bones had collected? Can’t see this as stomach contents. Hmm that makes sense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpc Posted April 7, 2020 Share Posted April 7, 2020 1 hour ago, Dracarys said: Is it more likely to be section of a channel deposit where bones had collected? Can’t see this as stomach contents. Exactly. These are quite common in the Lance and Hell Creek Formations. Rather than being accumulated by being in a gut together these bones probably found their final resting spot thanks to Cretaceous river currents. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinobot Posted April 7, 2020 Author Share Posted April 7, 2020 Ok great thanks to you both! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeschWhat Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 9 hours ago, Dinobot said: Ok thanks! what does acid etching on bone look like? Here is a piece of what I think is acid etched bone from the Hell Creek Formation. When I was cleaning it up in the lab, I thought it was petrified wood until I put it under the microscope. Perhaps @Troodon and @jpc can confirm. 3 Lori www.areallycrappystory.com/fossils www.facebook.com/fossilpoo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinobot Posted April 8, 2020 Author Share Posted April 8, 2020 3 hours ago, GeschWhat said: Here is a piece of what I think is acid etched bone from the Hell Creek Formation. When I was cleaning it up in the lab, I thought it was petrified wood until I put it under the microscope. Perhaps @Troodon and @jpc can confirm. Thanks for the info and photo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troodon Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 9 hours ago, GeschWhat said: Here is a piece of what I think is acid etched bone from the Hell Creek Formation. When I was cleaning it up in the lab, I thought it was petrified wood until I put it under the microscope. Perhaps @Troodon and @jpc can confirm. Certainly the right size and looks etched a good candidate 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpc Posted April 8, 2020 Share Posted April 8, 2020 I can't tell if it is acid etched or just weathered from sitting on the Cretaceous ground for too long. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeschWhat Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 On 4/8/2020 at 1:09 PM, jpc said: I can't tell if it is acid etched or just weathered from sitting on the Cretaceous ground for too long. Yeah, it was found in float material, so there is no way to know for sure. Lori www.areallycrappystory.com/fossils www.facebook.com/fossilpoo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpc Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 Lori... I do have a pile of little coprolites set aside to send you. Be patient. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now