Samurai Posted August 2, 2020 Share Posted August 2, 2020 Location is in Missouri The area is dated to the Pennsylvanian Formation: Muncie Creek Shale Found this very small tooth like structure and was wondering if anyone could confirm if it is a tooth or not. Normally I can identify teeth if they are large enough, but this specimen is very small. I have found teeth before in these concretions but much larger such as a possible Symmorium or Glikmanius along with a tooth from a member of Eugeneodontida. Here are some images I edited that might make some details more clearer: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobWill Posted August 3, 2020 Share Posted August 3, 2020 Interesting find. I don't recognize it at all but I hope someone does. Maybe if you can expose more of it or get a closer image with more detail it would help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockwood Posted August 3, 2020 Share Posted August 3, 2020 I can see it being scraps of fish bones. Perhaps a tooth. Some more magnification would help. It is really small. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samurai Posted September 9, 2022 Author Share Posted September 9, 2022 (edited) On 8/3/2020 at 1:21 AM, Rockwood said: I can see it being scraps of fish bones. Perhaps a tooth. Some more magnification would help. It is really small. I'm fashionably late as ever, but looking through my old posts and finally obtaining a way to put fossils under a microscope I have been able to take several photos of this specimen. However i'm still at a loss at what fragment this could be in this phosphatic nodule. Recently I have found a confirmed tooth of similar size (although completely different shape) that appears to be made of the same material that I can post here if that is deemed relevant. Photo with the coprolitic material in the background: due to being at an odd angle It was difficult to get a photo of this specimen being entirely clear. Edited September 9, 2022 by Samurai Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockwood Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 The texture doesn't seem right to be tooth or bone now. I suppose it could have been altered somehow though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samurai Posted September 10, 2022 Author Share Posted September 10, 2022 (edited) 2 hours ago, Rockwood said: The texture doesn't seem right to be tooth or bone now. I suppose it could have been altered somehow though. Yeah I didn't have really high hopes of it being a tooth, but it truly is a mystery. Especially how so far a lot of microfossils seem to be "coated" and replaced with this white mineral. I guess in this case time will tell what these microfossils will look like as I eventually will open more nodules and notice more of them. btw here is the tooth I referenced originally, I'm still awaiting my professors response on weather conodont or cladodont as he works with microfossils like radiolarians, condonts, and foraminifera. Maybe I should ask him what he thinks on the "arrow head" shaped mystery posted above. I wont on this specimen, but i'm thinking to see if this material fizzes in acid out of my own curiosity. Edited September 10, 2022 by Samurai Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockwood Posted September 10, 2022 Share Posted September 10, 2022 Conodont is what came to my mind. I know very little about them though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now