Jump to content

Samurai

Recommended Posts

Location is in Missouri

The area is dated to the Pennsylvanian 

Formation: Muncie Creek Shale

 

 

Found this very small tooth like structure and was wondering if anyone could confirm if it is a tooth or not. Normally I can identify teeth if they are large enough, but this specimen is very small.

 

I have found teeth before in these concretions but much larger such as a possible Symmorium or Glikmanius along with a tooth from a member of Eugeneodontida. 

20200802_150036_HDR.jpg.d6085ace8b8a79b15543737d42a8da43.jpg20200802_150047.jpg.e9c1470e92616b70e05c0986b44f9c5c.jpg20200802_150354_HDR.jpg.39c2ee9b2937f4d42473a4f0a77aa346.jpg

 

 

 

 

Here are some images I edited that might make some details more clearer:

 

 

 

image.png.d9af6db7c17e4f3ffeabfd6418419589.pngimage.png.c1df28ac5d41e28ea913b38ebfaabb41.png

20200802_150346.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting find. I don't recognize it at all but I hope someone does. Maybe if you can expose more of it or get a closer image with more detail it would help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see it being scraps of fish bones. Perhaps a tooth. Some more magnification would help. It is really small.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
On 8/3/2020 at 1:21 AM, Rockwood said:

I can see it being scraps of fish bones. Perhaps a tooth. Some more magnification would help. It is really small.

I'm fashionably late as ever, but looking through my old posts and finally obtaining a way to put fossils under a microscope I have been able to take several photos of this specimen. However i'm still at a loss at what fragment this could be in this phosphatic nodule. Recently I have found a confirmed tooth of similar size (although completely different shape) that appears to be made of the same material that I can post here if that is deemed relevant. 

  923092559_20220909-102219(1).thumb.jpg.e5a5e4d0b46f5309e34fc29de7aa33a3.jpg

 

Photo with the coprolitic material in the background:

20220909-102352.jpg

20220909-102837.jpg

due to being at an odd angle It was difficult to get a photo of this specimen being entirely clear. 

20220909-101629.jpg

 

 

Edited by Samurai
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Rockwood said:

The texture doesn't seem right to be tooth or bone now. I suppose it could have been altered somehow though. :Confused05:

Yeah I didn't have really high hopes of it being a tooth, but it truly is a mystery. Especially how so far a lot of microfossils seem to be "coated" and replaced with this white mineral. I guess in this case time will tell what these microfossils will look like as I eventually will open more nodules and notice more of them. 

 

btw here is the tooth I referenced originally, I'm still awaiting my professors response on weather conodont or cladodont as he works with microfossils like radiolarians, condonts, and foraminifera. Maybe I should ask him what he thinks on the "arrow head" shaped mystery posted above. 

 

20220908-132713.jpg20220902-101838.jpg

 

I wont on this specimen, but i'm thinking to see if this material fizzes in acid out of my own curiosity. 

Edited by Samurai
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...