Jump to content

Huntonia

Recommended Posts

Hello all, I recently acquired this unidentified illaenid trilobite from the ordovician of Sweden. It's had some sloppy repair work (which I'm hopeful I can improve) but before I do I'm hoping someone can help me put a genus to it. It has a long, robust genal spine which doesn't seem to match any illaenus I've seen from Sweden. Any help is appreciated.

20200818_152134.thumb.jpg.90e0ea485e30a5aeb12c7d3383cf3372.jpg20200818_152035.thumb.jpg.c44dbe1147d8f9774c5c73bafcd72228.jpg20200818_152152.thumb.jpg.2fa89752d1d9f0be46cd1a281da5e1a6.jpg20200818_152134.thumb.jpg.f9300bd66345b4d5e5abb3f80a9684e9.jpg

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Misha :fistbump:

 

Here are 3 classic monographs on the Illaenidae of Sweden:

 

Holm, G. 1883
De Svenska arterna af Trilobitslägtet Illaenus (Dalman).
[The Swedish species of the Trilobite genus Illaenus (Dalman).]
Bihang Till Kungliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar, 7(3):1-148  PDF LINK

 

Jaanusson, V. 1953
Zur Morphologie und Taxonomie der Illaeniden.

[On the Morphology and Taxonomy of the Illaenids.]
Archiv For Mineralogi och Geologi, 1(15):545-581  PDF LINK

 

Jaanusson, V. 1957
Unterordovizische Illaeniden aus Skandinavien, mit bemerkungen ueber die Korrelation des Unterordoviziums.
[Lower Ordovician Illaenids from Scandinavia, with remarks on the correlation of the Lower Ordovician.]
Bulletin of the Geological Institutions of the University of Uppsala, 37(1-2):79-165  PDF LINK

  • I found this Informative 6

image.png.a84de26dad44fb03836a743755df237c.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Impressive work @Misha and @piranha!

Thanks once more for a quick ID. At times like these I'm always reminded how much more I have to learn, one of the many great things about this hobby :)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Misha and Piranha are probably correct, but I have a book with a picture that looks very close.  It is labeled Niobella laeviceps.  Is that related?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Paleome said:

Misha and Piranha are probably correct, but I have a book with a picture that looks very close.  It is labeled Niobella laeviceps.  Is that related?

No. Niobella is an asaphid. The specimen above is a corynexochid. Note the hallmark effacement of the features of the cephalon and pygidium, which is diagnostic for that Order. 

  • I found this Informative 4

...How to Philosophize with a Hammer

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Paleome said:

Thank you, I like learning anything new.

Would you agree they look similar, or maybe my book had the wrong picture in it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Paleome said:

Would you agree they look similar, or maybe my book had the wrong picture in it.

Here are the two compared.

 

Images from Klikushin, V., Evdokimov, A. and P. Pilipyuk (2009). Ordovician Trilobites of the St. Petersburg Region, Russia. St. Petersburg: Griffon Enterprises.

Screen Shot 2020-08-18 at 9.24.34 PM.png

Screen Shot 2020-08-18 at 9.23.43 PM.png

  • I found this Informative 2

...How to Philosophize with a Hammer

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Paleome said:

Would you agree they look similar, or maybe my book had the wrong picture in it.

 

Niobella has 8 thoracic segments ... Dysplanus has 9.

 

image.thumb.png.22b77b2dedf30f1161b3da80e710fa57.png

  • I found this Informative 2

image.png.a84de26dad44fb03836a743755df237c.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe you all!  A big learning experience for me.  I am not used to looking at trilobites a lot of the time, so I am probably getting the wrong first impression, and not looking at the most important features for identification.  I need to study them more, and pay greater attention to the number of sections, etc. 

 

Please believe me, I wasn't doubting any of you.  I automatically defer to your knowledge in a heartbeat.  I finally counted the number of sections in my picture, and there were 8, just as you said.   Thank you all!  Now I have a better idea of what to look for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Paleome said:

A big learning experience for me.  I am not used to looking at trilobites a lot of the time, so I am probably getting the wrong first impression, and not looking at the most important features for identification.  I need to study them more, and pay greater attention to the number of sections, etc. 

@Paleome, if you want to learn more about trilobites and IDing them you should visit this website: http://trilobites.info/ordersoftrilobitesold.htm

It's an excellent guide to the 9 orders of trilobites. It outlines the main differences, as well as the various suborders and families, and their characteristics. I think you will find it very helpful.

 :thumbsu:

  • I found this Informative 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...