Small theropod footprint?

[Top Trilo]

I found this rock in some landscaping rocks in Arapahoe country Colorado. I know it will be tough. I hope the photos will be enough to get a confirmation that it’s a real footprint and maybe get an I.D There is also a lot of plant material across the whole thing which I hope is proof that it’s fossilized

 

 

top view with light from the front to outline the detail of the footprint

 

 

 

top view

 

 

 

back view

 

 

 

 

left view

 

 

 

 

front view

 

 

 

 

 

right view

 

 

 

 

 

bottom view

 

 

 

 

 

Close up of the largest plant piece. 

I don’t know If the 6 side photos matter with a rock like this but I want to be as accurate as possible.

[Top Trilo]

Sorry the labels of the photos did not get posted directly underneath.

Top one is with light from the front outlining detail

Second one is top view

Third one is back view

Fourth is left view

Fifth is front view

Sixth is right view

Seventh is bottom view

Last is a close up of the largest plant piece measuring about 1.5 centimeters long

[Fossildude19]

Sorry, but I am not seeing a footprint here.   

This doesn't look like typical footprint bearing shale. 

Not sure if those are plant fossils in there, or mineral inclusions, but I would be tempted to say they are mineral inclusions. 

 

 

Shape doesn't look typical, either.   

[Top Trilo]

Ok thank you Fossildude19 for the information, I will post pictures of another item found in the same area that has an odd symmetry and hope this one is a fossil.

[Mark Kmiecik]

5 hours ago, Fossildude19 said:

Sorry, but I am not seeing a footprint here.   

This doesn't look like typical footprint bearing shale. 

Not sure if those are plant fossils in there, or mineral inclusions, but I would be tempted to say they are mineral inclusions. 

 

 

Shape doesn't look typical, either.   

Perhaps severely arthritic?