Jump to content

Stromatolite? Sponge? UNKNOWN!!!


minnbuckeye

Recommended Posts

I had attempted to ID similar fossils awhile ago but feel they were lost in the trilobite photos. So today, I will only present these new unknown "blobs" from the Cambrian , Eau Claire Formation of western Wisconsin in hopes to definitively ID these. Maybe they are even geologic.

 

 DSC_1056-002.JPG.6f67d196798336cdeaf6fab41ca52888.JPGDSC_1057-001.JPG.10af6f7178e6dab67406cd34a7a281c6.JPGDSC_1058-001.JPG.27566904b0ce0168e43bac09ae801bd0.JPGDSC_1055-001.JPG.3dc231e78256d9a4709937d476d19730.JPG

  DSC_1059-001.JPG.f6a587c7189254e8f51fb6e5951d3d9c.JPG

 

 Good Luck!!!!! 

 

Mike

 

 

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Rockwood said:

concretion.

 

The matrix in the Eau Claire Formation is !00% sandstone. All of the trilo bits and bites are just impressions left in the sandstone. If you broke one of these unknowns in half, it will look just like the matrix.... SAND. I think logic rules concretion out. Some type of trace fossil makes more sense, but of what??? These occur fairly frequent when splitting the matrix. If it helps, hyoliths are present too.

3 hours ago, T. nepaeolicus said:

Stromatolite is my guess

 

I mentioned stromatolite, but similar to a concretion, I would expect a change from sand on cross section, if it was so. They are reef builders, so structurally pretty tough, unlikely to dissolve away???? 

 

 I have wrestled with these for years and most rule everything out in my mind. 

 

But thanks for the suggestions!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, minnbuckeye said:

If you broke one of these unknowns in half, it will look just like the matrix.... SAND. I think logic rules concretion out. 

Concretion forms from the migration of minute particles within stationary matrix. All that is required to make these is a slight increase in the durability of the cementation locally.

I think logic very much includes them.

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 @RockwoodFound this picture reading about sandstone concretions. Lower left looks VERY similar, making your suggestion very plausible.  I just expect the interior to show banding to some degree similar to the second photo.

 

 P1-2019-03-26HughCopland-BackyardGeology-Hugh Copland-Concretions.jpg

I PHOTO: Hugh Copland

  

Back to main page
concretion.jpg
 
 Mike
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...