Jump to content

Rubykicks

Recommended Posts

I found this mandible (I think) near Bloomington, Indiana over the weekend and was wondering if anyone could give me an ID on it. I believe it's the mandible of a rodent, but that's about as far as I get. Seems to large for a mouse or rat, but maybe a muskrat, shrew (if those are bigger?), or squirrel?  And I'm guessing it's more recent rather than fossil?

20210512_142121.jpg

20210512_142137_HDR.jpg

20210512_142145_HDR.jpg

20210512_142207_HDR.jpg

20210512_142218_HDR.jpg

20210512_142230_HDR.jpg

20210512_142247_HDR.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Rabbit ? Lagomorph.

 

Coco

  • I found this Informative 1
  • I Agree 2

----------------------
OUTIL POUR MESURER VOS FOSSILES : ici

Ma bibliothèque PDF 1 (Poissons et sélaciens récents & fossiles) : ici
Ma bibliothèque PDF 2 (Animaux vivants - sans poissons ni sélaciens) : ici
Mâchoires sélaciennes récentes : ici
Hétérodontiques et sélaciens : ici
Oeufs sélaciens récents : ici
Otolithes de poissons récents ! ici

Un Greg...

Badges-IPFOTH.jpg.f4a8635cda47a3cc506743a8aabce700.jpg Badges-MOTM.jpg.461001e1a9db5dc29ca1c07a041a1a86.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks recent, not fossil.  :unsure: 

I agree with rabbit. 

 

It's better if you do not hold your fossils. 

Place them on a flat surface, and take pictures from directly above the specimen, please. 

  • I found this Informative 1
  • I Agree 1

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Fossildude19 said:

Looks recent, not fossil.  :unsure: 

I agree with rabbit. 

 

It's better if you do not hold your fossils. 

Place them on a flat surface, and take pictures from directly above the specimen, please. 

I will make sure that I do that from now on. Thank you guys for the help.  :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...