cava.zachary Posted January 9, 2022 Share Posted January 9, 2022 Hi all, I found this horn-like fossil in a north Florida river recently. It seems fairly light and porous (not like an antler). It reminds me of some of the cranial appendages of tylopods that I'm reading about, but it's probably something less exciting. I appreciate the help! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Pristis Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 It's far more likely to be a white tail deer antler tine. 1 1 http://pristis.wix.com/the-demijohn-page What seest thou else In the dark backward and abysm of time? ---Shakespeare, The Tempest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 13 hours ago, Harry Pristis said: It's far more likely to be a white tail deer antler tine. One of my favorite lines in Paleontology for this situation: When you hear hoofsteps, think horse, not zebra. (But recently, a gained some South African paleontologist friends, who pointed out this adage doesn't not work over there...) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cava.zachary Posted January 11, 2022 Author Share Posted January 11, 2022 Thank you @Harry Pristis and @Carl. That's what I had initially thought, but it felt lighter than I expected for antler so that threw me off. So, for fossils of species that still occur in the area, is there any way to determine age (even roughly) if they are found in a river like this one was? (E.g. a few hundred years vs. 10,000 years, etc.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 On 1/10/2022 at 7:40 PM, cava.zachary said: Thank you @Harry Pristis and @Carl. That's what I had initially thought, but it felt lighter than I expected for antler so that threw me off. So, for fossils of species that still occur in the area, is there any way to determine age (even roughly) if they are found in a river like this one was? (E.g. a few hundred years vs. 10,000 years, etc.) Aging would be difficult in this situation because the specimen has lost its geologic context. It could potentially be carbon dated but this is expensive. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sjfriend Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 In 1st and 3rd photo, hard to tell in photo as I see them, is that a hole or damage near base? Can't tell if blood vessel or nerve hole or just a bit of damage. If it is a hole then not a antler tine. If damage then it sure looks like an antler time of some sort Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cava.zachary Posted January 12, 2022 Author Share Posted January 12, 2022 1 hour ago, Sjfriend said: In 1st and 3rd photo, hard to tell in photo as I see them, is that a hole or damage near base? Can't tell if blood vessel or nerve hole or just a bit of damage. If it is a hole then not a antler tine. If damage then it sure looks like an antler time of some sort I'm not sure, I thought it was a nerve/vessel hole but I don't have much experience. Attaching a couple more photos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sjfriend Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 1 hour ago, cava.zachary said: I'm not sure, I thought it was a nerve/vessel hole but I don't have much experience. Attaching a couple more photos. Looks more like just a dimple in the bone then a hole. If a hole it would go all the way into the core. So, I'm leaning more towards antler tine. And age really impossible to figure out without expensive test but definitely appears mineralized so I'm guessing fossil and not just water staining. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now