Jump to content

Large Limpet Keyhole Fossil? 18cm (7”) Mystery desert find


Nat111909

Recommended Posts

Hi. This fossil was found in the high desert east of Bend, Oregon, but is not likely from this area. Most of the fossils in this area are wood…I’ve never heard of anyone finding a shell.
 

I found it placed next to a trail that is used daily by many people. I have no idea who left it or where it is from. 

The only photos I have found online that looked close were for a couple of New Zealand keyhole limpet fossils which were documented in the 1970’s. 


The fossil has a hole in it that looks similar to a keyhole, but is partially filled in and not visible from the inside of the shell.

 

Any help is appreciated. Thank you!

 

 

 

26116211-B23A-40B3-BEAE-164E8915090A.jpeg

BE73003A-F915-4EB7-9D07-D758A87B3ECB.jpeg

9B08BF1F-6E7A-43A0-B007-0A5CAF848B8E.jpeg

A0CBD9B6-4272-4C1D-AE3B-DAFD27C334C1.jpeg

6FEEB02B-8FD8-479D-AA5F-1AE68A0A1E08.jpeg

05AB16B8-B51B-48F4-B789-4AE591D53EC3.jpeg

14B30367-A889-4FFD-8257-4310DDC14808.jpeg

BD6F0531-8775-4720-BCB8-67AB97BBCE5C.jpeg

3B93A2B3-A9F6-4863-95A1-7CC110B5D1D2.jpeg

124148D2-0836-4495-9A09-CB96CA8D1109.jpeg

190D0EF9-AF59-4556-96EE-8EDFE25D150C.jpeg

D39E147A-9CEA-433E-954E-FF125D1573C7.jpeg

9A79C18A-A17C-40B0-A9CF-C1242BFC882D.jpeg

553835AF-F96B-4CB7-A2F8-955B176E3F50.jpeg

2B0811AB-DAA7-4923-95F7-AE8EAA28EC5A.jpeg

0073E90C-6695-424C-9819-B5D3D2CB7C82.jpeg

6323923F-7AF6-412C-ABD9-8CE3512A15FC.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First, welcome to the Forum.

 

Your shell is a limpet, though not a keyhole limpet as there is no opening at the apex.  I'm not convinced it is a fossil, especially as you say shell fossils are not known from the area.  It's more likely (in my opinion) to be a modern shell, possibly the owl limpet Lottia gigantea which occurs along the Pacific coast and gets to be very large.  There are various possible scenarios that would result in such a shell being transported by human activity from the coast to your area.  The structure attached to the shell in photo #4 is the base of a barnacle.  Other structures you show attached to the shell are the remains of the calcareous tubes of polychaete worms such as Spirobus.

 

Don

  • I found this Informative 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with the above. The trace fossils are determining the geological age. I think I can see the combined bioerosion on all surfaces of the shell ( Rogerella, Maeandropolydora, Entobia) also the barnacle attachment scar and the Spirorbis colony.

Edited by abyssunder

" We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. "

Thomas Mann

My Library

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...