Jump to content

FF7_Yuffie

Recommended Posts

Unfortunately, seller doesn't lnow beyond Hell Creek.

 

Both are just over an inch long. 

 

1, 2 and 3 = tooth 1

 

Now the base does indent slightly, but it is less rectangular and more rounded at the rear. So I would love an opinion on it.

 

Picture 4, 5 and 6 is tooth 2. This looks partial? Though the photo of the base isn't head on (I've asked for extra pic), it looks sheared rather than complete?

 

Pic 7= left is tooth 1, right is tooth 2.

 

Thanks for the help.

1.jpg

2.jpg

3.jpg

4.jpg

5.jpg

6.jpg

7.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Fossildude19 changed the title to Nano or Rex?

@Troodon is our resident expert!

~ Isaac; www.isaactfm.com 

 

"Don't move! He can't see us if we don't move!" - Alan Grant

 

Come to the spring that is The Fossil Forum, where the stream of warmth and knowledge never runs dry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are Tyrannosaurid teeth.  Without a location hard to say much more that without confirmation of HC.    With the crazy prices of Trex teeth it's important to be diligent on an ID and be comfortable that the seller info is trustworthy.   The obtuse photos make it hard to see both sides but the teeth appear fairly complete with some areas of the base missing.  I don't believe these are Nanotyrannus teeth if HC but need to see the base photo you requested

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...