Jump to content

Mosasaur predation marks


hadrosauridae

Recommended Posts

Today I was cleaning the baculites found on the last fossil trip, and found one VERY cool one.  This segment looks to have clear and deep tooth holes in it.  It is believed that mosasaurs fed on baculites, and the hole sizes would certainly agree with that.

 

2069044415_mosybite.thumb.jpg.e63ec9f00df1a335615c48f35959ad18.jpg

  • Enjoyed 1

"There is no shortage of fossils. There is only a shortage of paleontologists to study them." - Larry Martin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm skeptical.  Was this an old mosasaur, missing some teeth, and unable to crunch through this size baculites?  :D

The human mind has the ability to believe anything is true.  -  JJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hmmm - think you can get a photo with flash of the bottom of the pits? 

 

Texas A&M barely has fossil collections worth mentioning - but on display is an ammonite with rather convincing mosasaur bite marks on it, so it is possible. But - I agree with John that this would be an unusual bite with only two tooth holes on the entire vertical. 

“Not only is the universe stranger than we think, it is stranger than we can think” -Werner Heisenberg 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, hadrosauridae said:

This segment looks to have clear and deep tooth holes in it.  It is believed that mosasaurs fed on baculites, and the hole sizes would certainly agree with that.


Your fossil is a steinkern of an ammonite. The two holes are in the infilling sediment, not the original shell. Why would a mosasaur bite a mud filled Baculites shell?

  • I found this Informative 1
  • I Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...