Katy2319 Posted November 4, 2022 Share Posted November 4, 2022 Hi All! I'm trying to identify this fossil for a local museum, but I've never seen anything like it. We're not sure where it was found exactly, but definitely in Berrien County, MI. Our fossil record is heavily Devonian aquatic fossils, with later records of Pleistocene fauna. I'd be grateful for any help or tips anyone can give! Thanks! Katy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted November 4, 2022 Share Posted November 4, 2022 The round item looks like a concretion or nodule of some sort. The other item may be as well, but images of the ends of the longer piece may be helpful. 2 Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katy2319 Posted November 4, 2022 Author Share Posted November 4, 2022 I'll see if the museum can send me some pictures with other angles, and measurements too, since I don't have those either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mahnmut Posted November 4, 2022 Share Posted November 4, 2022 two possibilities that come to my mind are speleothem or stromatholite. Best Regards, J 2 Try to learn something about everything and everything about something Thomas Henry Huxley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockwood Posted November 4, 2022 Share Posted November 4, 2022 It's tempting to try to imagine this being a poorly preserved orthocone. The actual evidence is weak though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TqB Posted November 4, 2022 Share Posted November 4, 2022 Speleothem was my first thought, or maybe concretion. 1 2 Tarquin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coco Posted November 5, 2022 Share Posted November 5, 2022 You’d have to see the ends of the object long to see if there’s a hole all the way through, which reminds me of a stalactite. Coco ---------------------- OUTIL POUR MESURER VOS FOSSILES : ici Ma bibliothèque PDF 1 (Poissons et sélaciens récents & fossiles) : ici Ma bibliothèque PDF 2 (Animaux vivants - sans poissons ni sélaciens) : ici Mâchoires sélaciennes récentes : ici Hétérodontiques et sélaciens : ici Oeufs sélaciens récents : ici Otolithes de poissons récents ! ici Un Greg... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katy2319 Posted June 3, 2023 Author Share Posted June 3, 2023 I was able to get some more photos of the museum specimens, as well as a few more pieces as well! There appears to be a pith or potentially what used to be an open hole that runs through the center of all but the flat one (last two images) I've also done some research into speleothems, as was suggested by Mahnmut and TqB, and learned that there is one cave in the area, although its fairly removed from where these pieces were found. If they did come from the cave, perhaps they were picked up there and brought to the settlement by one of the missionaries. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coco Posted June 3, 2023 Share Posted June 3, 2023 Hi, Stalactite, recognizable by the holes through which the water drained. Coco 3 ---------------------- OUTIL POUR MESURER VOS FOSSILES : ici Ma bibliothèque PDF 1 (Poissons et sélaciens récents & fossiles) : ici Ma bibliothèque PDF 2 (Animaux vivants - sans poissons ni sélaciens) : ici Mâchoires sélaciennes récentes : ici Hétérodontiques et sélaciens : ici Oeufs sélaciens récents : ici Otolithes de poissons récents ! ici Un Greg... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supertramp Posted June 3, 2023 Share Posted June 3, 2023 I'm in the concretion camp for both, since the lateral cylindrical surface of the second find does not resemble that of a speleothem; many concretions do have a central hole ciao Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coco Posted June 4, 2023 Share Posted June 4, 2023 Hi, Never seen a concretion like that, but the second photo seems odd for a stalactite. How do we explain the hole in the concretions ? Coco ---------------------- OUTIL POUR MESURER VOS FOSSILES : ici Ma bibliothèque PDF 1 (Poissons et sélaciens récents & fossiles) : ici Ma bibliothèque PDF 2 (Animaux vivants - sans poissons ni sélaciens) : ici Mâchoires sélaciennes récentes : ici Hétérodontiques et sélaciens : ici Oeufs sélaciens récents : ici Otolithes de poissons récents ! ici Un Greg... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westcoast Posted June 4, 2023 Share Posted June 4, 2023 Are they calcite? Do they react with HCl.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supertramp Posted June 4, 2023 Share Posted June 4, 2023 Hi Coco; my colleagues and I from an Italian geology forum once came across concretions of this type and, rather interestingly, we had the opportunity to observe recent examples of their formation process; when you try to immerse these formations in water to measure their mass after imbibition, very thin columns of air bubbles develop from the small holes in the center of the concentric rings, which last about ten minutes: evidently these are not simple holes, as they appear to radially drain the interior of the object; perhaps this sheds light on the mechanism of formation: leakage of gas (CO2?) from the sediment --> decrease in the solubility of calcium carbonate --> precipitation of calcareous cement --> formation of concentric laminae? 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al Dente Posted June 4, 2023 Share Posted June 4, 2023 They look like rhizoliths. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now