Jump to content

Gastropod ID Simi Valley CA


Desrosiers1718

Recommended Posts

Found this Gastropod fossil in Simi Valley CA I know it’s Eocene.   I was thinking Natica but not sure.   Can anyone help ID.  

F13927AD-091E-4686-A09B-F5B6B94546E8.jpeg

1476FEF9-EB18-4467-807C-56144C0A3175.jpeg

C8F008A9-D04D-41FD-9CD0-715FA90E6C29.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Too damaged for me to deduce anything.

 

Coco

----------------------
OUTIL POUR MESURER VOS FOSSILES : ici

Ma bibliothèque PDF 1 (Poissons et sélaciens récents & fossiles) : ici
Ma bibliothèque PDF 2 (Animaux vivants - sans poissons ni sélaciens) : ici
Mâchoires sélaciennes récentes : ici
Hétérodontiques et sélaciens : ici
Oeufs sélaciens récents : ici
Otolithes de poissons récents ! ici

Un Greg...

Badges-IPFOTH.jpg.f4a8635cda47a3cc506743a8aabce700.jpg Badges-MOTM.jpg.461001e1a9db5dc29ca1c07a041a1a86.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It certainly has the right general shape to be a Natica, but there are several other genera of the family Naticidae that are similar and I am not certain how the fauna of the California Eocene differs from other Eocene faunas that I am more familiar with.  A good shot of the aperture and the umbilicus (opposite the crest or spire) might be helpful but it sort of looks like they could be damaged and/or covered with sediment.

Edited by ClearLake
  • I Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks very much like a naticid.  Two formations up in Northern Ca have a total of 6 different species and to me they all look identical.  I wish you luck in figuring out a species name.

 

RB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve found a few that look very similar to yours that I’ve tentatively IDed as eocernina hannibali. Here’s a few pics of mine followed by some images from literature that I’ve found. 

9104AB9E-24C0-445B-BF29-E5F25A1886C2.jpeg

419599F0-822C-46B2-934B-97B8CDA46686.jpeg

2DE47A83-1913-4200-8B1A-D21980BAE002.jpeg

2AE6F871-72C8-49AE-AFE4-7FE50EC401D4.jpeg

57131ABC-8CC2-4855-A5B8-24E0A789BDC0.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, TRout said:

I’ve found a few that look very similar to yours that I’ve tentatively IDed as eocernina hannibali.

I believe you may have it!  Its good to have a publication that probably represents the formation of the original fossils in question.  I went and found that publication to see what else was in there since I had trouble reading the picture you posted (probably my old eyes). I had originally asked for a picture of the aperture to try and help decide amongst the many naticid genera, but after reading your post, I relooked at picture 3 of the original specimen in question and had not noticed (the picture is a bit blurry and the specimen is broken, at least that's my excuse:headscratch:) the callus extending along the inner margin of the aperture.  This seems to match very well with your Eocernina hannibali and I believe would certainly rule out Natica.  I see that Eocernina was originally named Natica, but is now not even in the family Naticidae according to the Paleobiology Database.  Several learnings for me today, thanks!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...