Jump to content

Solnhofen Dragonfly - What is real?


DarasFossils

Recommended Posts

     Hello,

My Dad and I purchased a really beautiful Solnhofen dragonfly resembling something very similar to this (not my picture), which has these really prominent eyes and legs on it. Is this naturally preserved or likely painted on, and if so, does this affect the quality and value? Seller is reputable and I know paint is common with the Solnhofen just so you can see them for display which I don't mind but just curious what is likely real and what is not... Ours is a big boy at over 7". 

 

 

tumblr_pfkfilrzfO1t2k0z9o1_1280.jpg.0a85eb18a5d5e06a964c487c65497629.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would assume this is a negativ, colored. Not sure about the cerci, think they are not real.

The body does not have structure, the wings nervature does not look like the one shown on the pic.

The eyes..., wonderful :wacko:, not real.

If its cheap its a display-piece, negative with color. If it is expensive, wait and buy another one...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

some pics of the normal way of preservation to compare wings and body

all could be better prepped.

There is a nice website in germany about the solnhofen-fossils, if you like to check

 

Die Fossilien von Solnhofen (solnhofen-fossilienatlas.de)

 

the dragonflies

 

Libellen (Odonata) - Die Fossilien von Solnhofen (solnhofen-fossilienatlas.de)

 

 

 

 

5542_cfTharsophlebia-1zu1.jpg

5552_Libelle_cfCymtaophlebia_1.jpg

5554_cfStenophlebia-1zu1.jpg

  • I found this Informative 1
  • Enjoyed 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like lots of paint was used on that specimen.  You should post the images of your specimen so we can comment on it.  Athough we do not do valuations they can be significantly affected by their quality/paint.  Sellers may not always appreciate the amount of paint used or may not be forward with that information

  • I Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RJB said:

  I'm not saying they are, but the wings looked painted/stained?

 

RB

 

Yes the whole thing is painted, but it isn't the OP's specimen. ;)

They really need to post a photo of their item.

  • I Agree 2

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you know which quarry it came from? There are a lot of variations of color/quality in the limestone at Solnhoffen. The image you provided does seem to be stained and not complete. A way to check it it authentic is running a finger along the stone and then the wings you would feel smooth impressions versus rough stone. One other way is to use a UV/black light and shine it on the wings, If they glow green/yellow then it is real. However I have found in the past a dragonfly fossil from Solnhoffen which did have a prominent yellowish color to it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have much experience with Solnhoffen Dragonflies. 

But I would treat an insect not showing body segments and wing venation with caution.   :zzzzscratchchin:

MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png.a47e14d65deb3f8b242019b3a81d8160.png MotM August 2023 - Eclectic Collector

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Fossildude19 said:

 

Yes the whole thing is painted, but it isn't the OP's specimen. ;)

They really need to post a photo of their item.

Here is a photo from the listing of mine. It's a gift for my mom so it's currently packaged away still but my Dad and I took a quick look at it last night and that's what got me curious. But the body is raised like a normal specimen. 

240228-1.jpg.879b8335b5921814f64ffe9d939747d6.jpg

 

Edited by DarasFossils
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Troodon said:

Looks like lots of paint was used on that specimen.  You should post the images of your specimen so we can comment on it.  Athough we do not do valuations they can be significantly affected by their quality/paint.  Sellers may not always appreciate the amount of paint used or may not be forward with that information

Thanks for letting me know, I just posted an image above. I can post my own image once it's unwrapped but it's planned to be a gift. My Dad and I were obviously most excited by the size more than anything. Seller says we can send it back if we don't like it. 

Edited by DarasFossils
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Others more familiar with these deposits will comment but I would need sharper, brighter photo to make a constructive comment.

  • I Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Troodon said:

Others more familiar with these deposits will comment but I would need sharper, brighter photo to make a constructive comment.

Oh shoot, that one is bad. Here's a better one. I suspect legs are painted but the rest to me looks real. Correct me if I am wrong. 

240228-2.thumb.jpg.390aa56f962c306d960e54ae51ae20cd.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, piranha said:

Research the Crato dragonflies if you want a specimen without the inherent paint/varnish issues associated with the Solnhofen insect fossils. happy0144.gif

Thank you, I personally do like those, but my Dad wanted a bigger one. Are there any 6+ inch ones in other formations? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Antennas and legs are painted.  I think the wings are at a minimum outlined and possibly highlighted.   Let's see what others say.  I agree with piranha, the Crato specimens I've seen are spectacular and some are naturally colorful, most are small.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This one isn't bad, @DarasFossils.

This appears tinted to show it off better. Yes, legs, antennae and eyes look painted on, but the rest of it does not look bad at all.  :)

  • Thank You 1

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Fossildude19 said:

This one isn't bad, @DarasFossils.

This appears tinted to show it off better. Yes, legs, antennae and eyes look painted on, but the rest of it does not look bad at all.  :)

Oh my gosh thank you. My Dad and I love it but of course I was suspicious knowing what I know about fossils. But we decided size is the most important factor when choosing the Dragonfly. I'll send him this thread and we'll decide. 

  • Enjoyed 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Fossildude19 said:

legs, antennae and eyes look painted on

I am not entirely comfortable with the preservation of the abdomen; looks a bit touched-up.

It is otherwise a terrific specimen of an iconic fossil!

  • I found this Informative 1

"There has been an alarming increase in the number of things I know nothing about." - Ashleigh Ellwood Brilliant

“Try to learn something about everything and everything about something.” - Thomas Henry Huxley

>Paleontology is an evolving science.

>May your wonders never cease!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Auspex said:

I am not entirely comfortable with the preservation of the abdomen;

I agree with this.  There should be some sign of segmentation in the abdomen. Perhaps there is but I can't see it.

  • I Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, DarasFossils said:

Oh shoot, that one is bad. Here's a better one. I suspect legs are painted but the rest to me looks real. Correct me if I am wrong. 

 

The antenna are painted and not real. However not all of the legs are fake just partial. It seems just some paint has been used to touch up the ends of the legs. If you look closely the legs on the left side are very pale and are likely fake. The right side seems to have areas that contain real legs but are partial and have been painted so that they look complete. As with the thorax, there is segmentation and there is just faint traces of matrix covering it in some edges. Compared it to other dragonfly's I have found that are in my collection and the one you have shown ,apart from some minor details, looks real.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IF you want to knw for sure, you should use UV light photography.  I just saw a fabulous presentation by Mike Eklund on the use of using UV-A, UV-B and UV-C with long exposure photography to show what is original and what is glue or paint.  You can even see most paints with a plain long-wave "black light" but its not as diagnostic as with true dedicated UV lights.

Edited by hadrosauridae

"There is no shortage of fossils. There is only a shortage of paleontologists to study them." - Larry Martin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, hadrosauridae said:

IF you want to knw for sure, you should use UV light photography.  I just saw a fabulous presentation by Mike Eklund on the use of using UV-A, UV-B and UV-C with long exposure photography to show what is original and what is glue or paint.  You can even see most paints with a plain long-wave "black light" but its not as diagnostic as with true dedicated UV lights.

what you will see at the slab with the dragonfly is: the lasure

with the new pics I think the dragonfly is o.k., not the best but o.k.. With lasure on it and some paint. 

But, now I can see the venation

Legs, antenna, one or both eyes are colored (perhaps one eye and one leg are original but overpainted)

With the cercy we can say it´s a male

 

240228-2.thumb.jpg.390aa56f962c306d960e54ae51ae20cd.jpg.286ca3157f7fa2dd823b0b909e9c0b3d.jpg

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I show a pic of a dragonfly-wing-end

You see fine structures at the end and lasure on it. Bit away from the tip you see only lasure (it is one the wing, wing is preserved). This is what you could get with luck, normally the wing finestructures are not so good preserved at the solnhofen-dragonflies

 

4253_Libelle.thumb.jpg.26a1631610dd5614996e803513aae841.jpg4259_Libelle.thumb.jpg.77ee51d7e44245d4ebe7e589949cd29c.jpg

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/28/2023 at 2:58 PM, jacob86795 said:

Do you know which quarry it came from? There are a lot of variations of color/quality in the limestone at Solnhoffen. The image you provided does seem to be stained and not complete. A way to check it it authentic is running a finger along the stone and then the wings you would feel smooth impressions versus rough stone. One other way is to use a UV/black light and shine it on the wings, If they glow green/yellow then it is real. However I have found in the past a dragonfly fossil from Solnhoffen which did have a prominent yellowish color to it.  

 

could work, most of the dragonflies are stabile enough to try like this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/28/2023 at 6:13 PM, piranha said:

Research the Crato dragonflies if you want a specimen without the inherent paint/varnish issues associated with the Solnhofen insect fossils. happy0144.gif

 

not all are perfect..., there are some fakes on the market...

but, in general the crato dragonflies are definitely the best to get

 

one of the really best one FRZ_1427_DxO.thumb.jpg.f4b0741bf8e953b99dd6a2de410b58f7.jpg

 

 

Edited by rocket
  • Enjoyed 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...