Jump to content

Ptychodus Id Quick Guide


Tony Eaton

Recommended Posts

I'm recycling some content from a prior post to cobble together a quick, non technical guide to ID Ptychodus teeth. Many of the pictures below are from CreekCrawler.

A few terms:

  1. transverse ridges = the lines going across the tooth
  2. crown = the abrasive "eating" surface of the tooth
  3. margin = the area around the crown above the root

flat crowned, from oldest to youngest:

Ptychodus decurrens

  • low crown with ridges that split (bifurcate) to the end of the marginal area

4807278088_118329b99a.jpg

Ptychodus marginalis (polygyrus)

  • crown only moderately raised
  • ridges circle crown at marginal area and margin has a circular "finger print" pattern unlike decurrens

4807277210_fed82602c1.jpg

Ptychodus latissimus

  • few, thick, "sharp" ridges on the low crown
  • little marginal area

4806655695_1ec3a110f0_m.jpg

Ptychodus martini

  • very low crown, unlike decurrens and marginalis
  • the marginal area is rough or non existent and has no discernable pattern
  • more ridges and generally more rectangular compared to litissimus

4827562753_f387287fd7.jpg

high crowned, oldest to newest:

Ptychodus anonymus

  • small in general
  • 10+ ridges
  • rough margin
  • crown lower than whipplei and more rounded than mammillaris

4827323677_c734855de1_b.jpg

Ptychodus occidentalis

  • gently curved high crown at a slight angle to margin unlike mammillaris
  • 10+ fine ridges
  • ridges branch into the marginal area unlike anonymous

4673307815_9b5e843d2a.jpg

Ptychodus mammillaris

  • crown attached at a steep angle to the marginal area unlike occidentalis
  • ridges are course and crown wider/squarer than anonymous
  • marginal area has a circular pattern around the crown

4806655949_af319493f6.jpg

Ptychodus whipplei

very high crowned, peg like

transverse ridges generally do not extend to the margin

post-417-056496900%201279576719_thumb.jpg

Ptychodus mortoni

  • the crown is pointed with ridges running together meeting at a single point at the top of the crown

4828264368_9dc6bef454.jpg

Ptychodus atcoensis (sp.)

  • front to back (labial to lengual) median line
  • thick ridges that form a "chevron" pattern
  • recenly named by Shawn Hamm, previously Ptychodus sp.

4827431719_7fbe50bd14.jpg

Ptychodus rugosus

  • most rare Ptychodus at least in Texas, no pictures to post ;-)
  • transverse ridges are rough and poorly defined, almost giving the ridges a heavily "rusted" outline

Orginal post with some other great picks from kknight.

http://www.thefossilforum.com/index.php/topic/14366-ptychodus-occidentalis/

Edited by Tony Eaton
  • I found this Informative 24
  • Enjoyed 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for this. We should pin this.

  • I found this Informative 1
  • I Agree 1

In formal logic, a contradiction is the signal of defeat: but in the evolution of real knowledge, it marks the first step in progress toward victory.

Alfred North Whithead

'Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia!'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is a nice guide - great photos. The only information I would add would be the formations/sites each of the species is known from.

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good work, Tony and Barry. I once wanted to do something like this for the resident species of Salenia echinoids in Texas. You have assimilated something useful beyond state boundaries. :) I also agree it would be good to include the formation, age, or period typical for each species.... ;)

  • I found this Informative 1

The human mind has the ability to believe anything is true.  -  JJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting!

But personally, I don't see many differences (if any) between anonymous and mammillaris.

Can you point the differences out with more detail?

I can't really remember, but don't some authors consider anonymous and mammilaris as nomen dubium, resulting in one species, namely mammillaris? I'm not at home right now so I can't check any sources.

  • I found this Informative 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hieronymus, thanks for the feedback. I enjoy the debate :-)

I have just taken a picture that might be a better diagnostic example. Here is a picture of 2 teeth roughly the same size from the same site (middle Turonian, Kamp Ranch Fm., Denton Co.)

4832923794_a3411304c6.jpg

The tooth on the left is mammilaris, the one on the right anonymous. They have more or the same margin design and same ridge count, but the difference is that mammilaris is much more squared off (flat) at the top of the crown.

I have several teeth that are less clear cut and seem to be variations between mammilaris, anonymous, and even a bit like mortoni or atcoensis.

The picture of anonymous in my post above includes a tooth, (second tooth on the bottom left) that I might consider mammilaris judging by just that picture. In the pictures I included originally of mammilaris, the tooth on the right has a flat crown, but it is more narrow compared to most "mammilaris" that I've collected and at the angle I picked it is not clear. Here is another view where the flat crown is more obvious.

4807277936_b20c76427d_m.jpg

Unless I saw a naturally associated tooth set that showed morphology of both the flat and rounded crowns I would not agree that anonymous is a nomen dubium (doubtful name).

Edited by Tony Eaton
  • I found this Informative 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding adding more info, to do it right I'd need to drive to a University Library and get access to some work (namely Shawn Hamm's master's thesis).

I have a number of articles and websites I'll use to ID Ptychodus, but my two "go to" sources:

http://www.texassharks.org/

http://www.dallaspaleo.org/dpsstorepubs.htm (DPS volume 8)

Edited by Tony Eaton
  • I found this Informative 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

Thanks for this very interesting subject.

But I ask a question : did not Ptychodus have different teeth forms according to their place in the mouth ?

Coco

  • I found this Informative 1

----------------------
OUTIL POUR MESURER VOS FOSSILES : ici

Ma bibliothèque PDF 1 (Poissons et sélaciens récents & fossiles) : ici
Ma bibliothèque PDF 2 (Animaux vivants - sans poissons ni sélaciens) : ici
Mâchoires sélaciennes récentes : ici
Hétérodontiques et sélaciens : ici
Oeufs sélaciens récents : ici
Otolithes de poissons récents ! ici

Un Greg...

Badges-IPFOTH.jpg.f4a8635cda47a3cc506743a8aabce700.jpg Badges-MOTM.jpg.461001e1a9db5dc29ca1c07a041a1a86.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

Thanks for this very interesting subject.

But I ask a question : did not Ptychodus have different teeth forms according to their place in the mouth ?

Coco

Thank you, 'Coco'. Yes, of course, there are positional variations and individual variations and perhaps variations over time. Those variations make the ID of a single tooth or even a handful of these teeth such a dicey game.

But, it's a game that's entertaining. A few people actually make a living at museums playing this game. And, it keeps some of us collectors out of the juke joints.

  • I found this Informative 2
  • Enjoyed 1

http://pristis.wix.com/the-demijohn-page

 

What seest thou else

In the dark backward and abysm of time?

---Shakespeare, The Tempest

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yah, fossil collecting is healthy living provided I ignore any temptation to trespass LOL.

Coco, there is heterodonty in Ptychodus, most notable with symphysials that are sometimes quite odd, but the outer files or posterior teeth can also be tricky. However, these teeth are easy to single out and none are pictured above. Most Ptychodus toothsets I've seen pictured the teeth are very similar to each other, especially the general features of the marginal pattern. The Oceans of Kansas site details a few toothsets. http://www.oceansofkansas.com/Ptychodus.html

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/26/2010 at 9:31 PM, Tony Eaton said:

Hieronymus, thanks for the feedback. I enjoy the debate :-)

I have just taken a picture that might be a better diagnostic example. Here is a picture of 2 teeth roughly the same size from the same site (middle Turonian, Kamp Ranch Fm., Denton Co.)

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4112/4832923794_a3411304c6.jpg

The tooth on the left is mammilaris, the one on the right anonymous. They have more or the same margin design and same ridge count, but the difference is that mammilaris is much more squared off (flat) at the top of the crown.

I have several teeth that are less clear cut and seem to be variations between mammilaris, anonymous, and even a bit like mortoni or atcoensis.

The picture of anonymous in my post above includes a tooth, (second tooth on the bottom left) that I might consider mammilaris judging by just that picture. In the pictures I included originally of mammilaris, the tooth on the right has a flat crown, but it is more narrow compared to most "mammilaris" that I've collected and at the angle I picked it is not clear. Here is another view where the flat crown is more obvious.

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4120/4807277936_b20c76427d_m.jpg

Unless I saw a naturally associated tooth set that showed morphology of both the flat and rounded crowns I would not agree that anonymous is a nomen dubium (doubtful name).

Thank you for the explanation!

I'm going to wrestle trough my literature a little bit more now:-)

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

I like this file ! Thanks for this very interesting link. All your teeth are nice, and it is marvelous to see plate jaws of this shark. Many thanks.

Coco

  • I found this Informative 1

----------------------
OUTIL POUR MESURER VOS FOSSILES : ici

Ma bibliothèque PDF 1 (Poissons et sélaciens récents & fossiles) : ici
Ma bibliothèque PDF 2 (Animaux vivants - sans poissons ni sélaciens) : ici
Mâchoires sélaciennes récentes : ici
Hétérodontiques et sélaciens : ici
Oeufs sélaciens récents : ici
Otolithes de poissons récents ! ici

Un Greg...

Badges-IPFOTH.jpg.f4a8635cda47a3cc506743a8aabce700.jpg Badges-MOTM.jpg.461001e1a9db5dc29ca1c07a041a1a86.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

I'm bumping this great thread because someone just asked about a Ptychodus ID. The additional notes on mammilaris vs. anonymus are a cool bonus. For anyone who has picked up - whether in the field or through trades - a variety of Ptychodus teeth from various sites/ages, this is the guide you hoped existed somewhere.

Jess

Yah, fossil collecting is healthy living provided I ignore any temptation to trespass LOL.

Coco, there is heterodonty in Ptychodus, most notable with symphysials that are sometimes quite odd, but the outer files or posterior teeth can also be tricky. However, these teeth are easy to single out and none are pictured above. Most Ptychodus toothsets I've seen pictured the teeth are very similar to each other, especially the general features of the marginal pattern. The Oceans of Kansas site details a few toothsets. http://www.oceansofkansas.com/Ptychodus.html

Edited by siteseer
  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I recall someone on this forum mentioning a reclassification of Ptychodus teeth was forthcoming. Does anyone know whether this has been published?

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The closest reference I've seen is Systematic, Stratigraphic, Geographic and Paleocological Distribution of the Late Cretaceous Shark Genus Ptychodus within the Western Interior Seaway, Hamm (2008). I think this was his Masters thesis. I happen to have a hard copy of this 400+ page magnum opus in my library.

  • I found this Informative 1

Grüße,

Daniel A. Wöhr aus Südtexas

"To the motivated go the spoils."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

Just want to thank you for posting this. I think I've IDed this as a ptychodus mortoni thanks to this guide.

Cheers

 

 

 

!post-20069-0-83737800-1452735320_thumb.jpg

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Tony, thanks for your post. My wife found a complete 1.5 cm wide ptychodus in Walnut Creek metropolitan Park in Austin. The ridges are highly bifurcated as you drop from the crown to the margin. A British website pic says that crowns on P. decurrens are generally flat but can be bulbous (with higher ridge?). They also have a decurrens pic that looks more like the tooth she found. Is that your understanding as well? See pics.

post-18207-0-12823300-1456261171_thumb.jpg

post-18207-0-44479500-1456261193_thumb.png

  • I found this Informative 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

That tooth has a rather high, more bulbous crown than decurrens (which I still like calling P. decurrens) so I think it's P. occidentalis, which is an uncommon species for its time.

Two more pics.

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...

I recall someone on this forum mentioning a reclassification of Ptychodus teeth was forthcoming. Does anyone know whether this has been published?

I'm not too sure as I haven't reviewed the latest work in the last few years.

Paraptychodus washitaensis and Ptychodus rhombodus are two "new" species that need some attention. P. washitaensis is a tiny raisin like tooth from the lower Cretaceous that is rare. P. rhombodus is also a small tooth from the middle Cenomanian but has been lumped in with other species. I'll try to post pics from my collection when I get a chance.

  • I found this Informative 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are some pics of Ptychodus rhombodus that turn up in the Woodbine / Eagleford contact zones (Middle Cenomanian) in Texas.

Ptychodus rhombodus  tooth 1 lengual

Ptychodus rhombodus tooth 1 occlusal

Ptychodus rhombodus?

Ptychodus. rhombodus?

Very similar to P. decurrens except for the quick transitioned "speed bump" labial to lengual crown. P. decurrens has a more evenly rounded crown. P. rhombodus is like P. anonymus but occurs earlier (sometimes just feet below) P. anonymus and lacks the more developed marginal area (more elaborately textured sides) of P. anonymus. P. rhombodus also has a lower crown compared to P. anonymus although some teeth seem to be "in between". The tooth is named for the rhombic outline which combined with the "speed bump" crown and the "primitive" decurrens like ridge patterns warranted this tooth being designated it's own species (Underwood / Cumbaa 2009). I have collected several additional teeth that seem to be between P. rhombodus and P. anonymous and may simply get lumped in with P. decurrens?

middle Cenomanian Ptychodus "decurrens" with uneven elevated crown

Edited by Tony Eaton
  • I found this Informative 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A broken Paraptychodus washitaensis from the Duck Creek Fm. lower Cretaceous. This is less than 1cm in length. Note the raisin like appearance of the crown with a more primitive enamel design comparable to Ptychodus decurrens. Also, note how thin the enamel is compared to typical broken Ptychodus teeth. Some tooth positions lack multiple transverse ridges and have a hybodont like pointed crown. Perhaps if this tooth where whole the crown (top) would come to a single point more like other shark teeth?

stacked broken Paraptychodus small

Paraptychodus broken small

See recent publications from Shawn Hamm who had named the Genus and Species i.e Hamm 2008.
Edited by Tony Eaton
  • I found this Informative 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...