danco Posted May 29, 2015 Share Posted May 29, 2015 (edited) Here is an agatized polished slab and I wonder if Discocyclina marginata is embedded? It is from Indonesia (Sumatra?). Thanks for giving me our opinion. Edited May 29, 2015 by danco Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dshamilla Posted May 29, 2015 Share Posted May 29, 2015 There is a possibility that Discocyclina is embedded in the agate, but only close microscopic examination can provide a definite answer. If you haven't looked at the Sumatran feather agate site, see the following http://www.indoagate.com/feather.html. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danco Posted May 29, 2015 Author Share Posted May 29, 2015 Thank you, Dshamilla. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diceros Posted May 30, 2015 Share Posted May 30, 2015 You guys should provide more data for the rest of the members, to be informative, and less like a slab dealer at a rock show. First, what is Discocyclina marginata? It's a larger foraminiferan (a single-celled animal, like a shelled amoeba) from the early Tertiary, generally found in shallow marine water, where carbonate is available to build their large calcite shells, called tests. Discocyclina has a circular outline, and is fairly flat, except for the thicker central part. They're often found in large numbers. So what are they doing in this slab of Sumatran feather agate? They were originally in limestone, but here the limestone's been silicified, and the marine fossils show up clearly against the matrix. The slabs are called feather agate, because what you see is hundreds of Discocyclina marginata tests, all lying flat on the sea floor, so when you section them perpendicularly to the flat tests, they look like the pinnules of a bird feather. When the sectioned tests are examined microscopically, the tiny chambers of the test can be seen How does the limestone come to be silicified? Sumatra is a volcanically active area of the world, and at times, huge volumes of volcanic ash fall on the limestone. The ash is full of easily-soluable shards of amorphous opaline silica, so the water sucks the silica out of the ash, and deposits it on the limestone, which then converts to silicified limestone. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danco Posted May 30, 2015 Author Share Posted May 30, 2015 Thank you Diceros. A most enlightening answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diceros Posted May 30, 2015 Share Posted May 30, 2015 No problemo. I used to collect m. Eocene Discocyclina advena in NW Louisiana. My Master's thesis was on modern forams, in the failed hope of getting an oil co. job as a "bug man". There probably aren't many who can ID both fossil foraminiferan tests and rhino teeth to genus (I helped curate the American Museum's fossil rhino collection in the 70's). Three guesses as to which I prefer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danco Posted May 30, 2015 Author Share Posted May 30, 2015 To my limited knowledge (I am a very amateurish collector) forams must have been very small. That's why I raised the question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abyssunder Posted May 30, 2015 Share Posted May 30, 2015 (edited) Looking to comparable evidence to determine if the slab has Discocyclina marginata, a good reference might be STUDIES IN TERTIARY STRATIGRAPHY, CALIFORNIA COAST RANGES-LARGE FORAMINIFERS OF EOCENE AGE - Geological Survey Professional Paper 1213,page 46: Family DISCOCYCLINIDAE"The classification of Discocyclinidae is a complex problem for American species. The classifications are numerous and varied: Vaughan and Cole (1941),Bronnimann (1945),Cole (1948), and Caudri (1972). We accept Cole's classification for our work.Discocyclina ( Discocyclina) marginata (Cushman, 1919)Orthophragmina marginata Cushman, 1919, pl. 1,fig. 2: pl. 2, fig. 1.Orthophragmina marginata Cushman, 1920, pl. IX,fig. 1-2.Discocyclina (Discocyclina) marginata (Cushman).Cole and Gravell, 1952, pl. 93, fig. 1-9; pl. 94, fig.1-8; pl. 95, fig. 7-8.Discocyclina (Discocyclina) marginata (Cushman).Cole and Applin, 1964, pl. 10, fig. 1-8.Description.Lenticular species, inflated, diameter 10-14 mm, equatorial chambers higher than wide(h/w = 1.5) and very small. Thirty to forty rows of lateral chambers are very compressed and poorly visible.Distribution. California, localities 71CB983C,71CB978B, and EB633 near San Jose; Caribbean region (Cuba, St. Bartholomew), Florida, Georgia.Range. Middle Eocene.Remarks. Previously described in California as D. californica (Schenck, 1929, pl. 28, fig. 5; pl. 29, fig. 1-3; pl. 30, fig. 2-3), according to Cole and Applin (1964)."Looking at the document Bulletins of American Paleontology Vol.XLVII 1964/Bulletin no.212/PROBLEMS OF THE GEOGRAPHIC AND STRATIGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF AMERICAN MIDDLE EOCENE LARGER FORAMINIFERA - by Cole and Applin,on Pl.10 we find the pictures of Discocyclina(Discocyclina)marginata. If your forams are similar to what has been presented above then they could be Discocyclina marginata. The documents are in my Library. Edited May 30, 2015 by abyssunder " We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. " Thomas Mann My Library Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diceros Posted May 31, 2015 Share Posted May 31, 2015 Excellent answer abyssunder! Poor foraminifera haven't been getting their due on Fossil Forum. Danco - Most forams are tiny (usually less than a mm), but there's a group called "larger forams" which are far larger (all are single-celled animals, some just like to built up their tests). These include the Permian fusulinids, the Eocene discocylinids, the Oligocene Lepidocyclinids (known in America since the 1830's), and some big modern forms. The largest foram I ever saw was a big lt. Oligocene lepidocyclinid (I think it was Lepidocyclina ungulata) from the Florida panhandle - it looked like a fifty-cent piece (sorry, you rarely see those anymore - let's say about 1.5 in. in diameter), with a wrinkled edge. Anybody out there have one, of which you could to submit a photo? Fossil collectors should know about the larger forams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danco Posted May 31, 2015 Author Share Posted May 31, 2015 Thank you, again. Everything is now clear to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Natural Oneironaut Posted September 6, 2018 Share Posted September 6, 2018 If there is anybody wanted to examine this agate, I have some pieces in here that you can check. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abyssunder Posted September 6, 2018 Share Posted September 6, 2018 14 hours ago, Natural Oneironaut said: If there is anybody wanted to examine this agate, I have some pieces in here that you can check. Nice specimen! Thank you for posting it here. 1 " We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. " Thomas Mann My Library Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now