Jump to content

Tooth? Coral? Barnacle? Cephalopod? Help!


Micah

Recommended Posts

Hey all I'm clueless on this one. The vertical ridges and complete roundness of this piece aren't like anything I've found previously. I found this in a creek bed that runs through Oaks, Oklahoma among mostly brachiopods and bryozoans. Beyond the fact it's most likely aquatic my best guess is it's the tip of a piece of coral, but that really is a guess. Thanks in advance for the help! 

IMG_5076.JPG

IMG_5077.JPG

IMG_5078.JPG

IMG_5079.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hard to be sure from the photos, and I don't know the time period of your locality, but shark dentacle  (something like Petrodus) might be a possibility to check.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another vote for coral, at least that's what my gut says.

“...whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being evolved.” ~ Charles Darwin

Happy hunting,

Mason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll also vote for a solitary coral.

theme-celtique.png.bbc4d5765974b5daba0607d157eecfed.png.7c09081f292875c94595c562a862958c.png

"On ne voit bien que par le coeur, l'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux." (Antoine de Saint-Exupéry)

"We only well see with the heart, the essential is invisible for the eyes."

 

In memory of Doren

photo-thumb-12286.jpg.878620deab804c0e4e53f3eab4625b4c.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do we have any coral experts? I appreciate all the input, but it possible I'd really like someone who's a bit more certain to confirm or deny whether it's the tip of a solitary rugose coral, or something else entirely. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Rockwood said:

I recommend waiting. It could be, but I have doubts. 

Haha but waiting is so hard! I've got doubts too, I have found lots of coral, but none has ever looked like this. What really makes me doubt it most is how smooth the grooves and surface are. Coral tends to be porous, but this doesn't seem to have any of the typical tiny holes characteristic of the leftover skeletons of the tiny creatures that make up coral.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Micah said:

this doesn't seem to have any of the typical tiny holes characteristic of the leftover skeletons of the tiny creatures that make up coral.

The tiny holes I think you are referring to are the corallites of a coral colony. This is a solitary coral - the entire thing is a single corallite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/15/2017 at 11:26 PM, Micah said:

brachiopods and bryozoans

If you can expand on this there would be contextual evidence that would be helpful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Micah said:

I have found lots of coral, but none has ever looked like this.

The piece in question is not a coral. It is the dirt that filled in the top of a horn coral, making a mold of the living chamber. Notice that the matrix and the "mold" are the same material.

  • I found this Informative 2

Darwin said: " Man sprang from monkeys."

Will Rogers said: " Some of them didn't spring far enough."

 

My Fossil collection - My Mineral collection

My favorite thread on TFF.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, ynot said:

The piece in question is not a coral. It is the dirt that filled in the top of a horn coral, making a mold of the living chamber. Notice that the matrix and the "mold" are the same material.

Aha! That makes sense! I can definately see that now, Thanks!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...