Brett Breakin' Rocks Posted August 18, 2017 Share Posted August 18, 2017 Hi Guys, I'm looking at this tooth on an auction site and curious about the provenance. Sellers sometimes get their material from elsewhere , and the location information for them is murky, so nailing down the localities for SC and NC teeth is like ..... well, like pulling teeth really. This seller has said that this is an Auriculatus tooth from Lee Creek phosphate mine. Since I think the formation is too young for a ric, my assumption would be chubutensis. I have seen chub teeth from Lee Creek with very prominent cusps. Though this one doesn't seem right. The morphology of the tooth seems like it may be a SC/NC Angustidens ? I'm mainly looking at the slight re-curve beneath the cusps on the roots but I know that can't always be a good diagnostic tool. These are the only shots I have. Thanks, Brett PS. With the location in question I know that a positive ID is almost impossible but I thought I'd give it a shot. @sixgill pete Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SailingAlongToo Posted August 18, 2017 Share Posted August 18, 2017 @MarcoSr Don't know much about history Don't know much biology Don't know much about science books......... Sam Cooke - (What A) Wonderful World Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al Dente Posted August 18, 2017 Share Posted August 18, 2017 I think there is a fair chance that this came from Lee Creek. It looks too thin to be auriculatus. If from Lee Creek it probably came from the reject material which is mostly Miocene but may be as old as Oligocene. This tooth has holes in the root that is similar to teeth I've seen from South Carolina so I would add that as a possibility too. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TNCollector Posted August 18, 2017 Share Posted August 18, 2017 Color is a bit darker than I have found in material from that mine. But perhaps it came from the notorious green layer? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brett Breakin' Rocks Posted August 18, 2017 Author Share Posted August 18, 2017 9 hours ago, Al Dente said: I think there is a fair chance that this came from Lee Creek. It looks too thin to be auriculatus. If from Lee Creek it probably came from the reject material which is mostly Miocene but may be as old as Oligocene. This tooth has holes in the root that is similar to teeth I've seen from South Carolina so I would add that as a possibility too. 4 minutes ago, TNCollector said: Color is a bit darker than I have found in material from that mine. But perhaps it came from the notorious green layer? Hi Guys, Al, if it is from the reject .. which it well could be .. the Oligocene. Could this be an angustidens ? Or would something out of Lee Creek still be considered more likely a chubutensis ? I'm just not that familiar/educated with the fauna in that area. Well, not yet anyway. Thanks again for all of the replys, I appreciate it. Cheers, Brett Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abyssunder Posted August 18, 2017 Share Posted August 18, 2017 " In the Lee Creek Mine fauna we recognize three species of Carcharodon: C. subauriculatus from the Pungo River Formation, C. megalodon from the Yorktown Formation, and C. carcharías from the Yorktown and James City formations." for comparison: "We distinguished this species from Carcharodon megalodon by the presence of lateral cusplets on the anterior teeth of subadults and usually adults; these cusplets are not separated from the crown by a deep notch as they are in C. angustidens and C. auriculatus. Juvenile, anterior teeth of C. megalodon may possess well-defined lateral cusplets. " excerpts from here 1 " We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. " Thomas Mann My Library Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brett Breakin' Rocks Posted August 18, 2017 Author Share Posted August 18, 2017 44 minutes ago, abyssunder said: " In the Lee Creek Mine fauna we recognize three species of Carcharodon: C. subauriculatus from the Pungo River Formation, C. megalodon from the Yorktown Formation, and C. carcharías from the Yorktown and James City formations." for comparison: "We distinguished this species from Carcharodon megalodon by the presence of lateral cusplets on the anterior teeth of subadults and usually adults; these cusplets are not separated from the crown by a deep notch as they are in C. angustidens and C. auriculatus. Juvenile, anterior teeth of C. megalodon may possess well-defined lateral cusplets. " excerpts from here Fantastic resource .. thanks so much @abyssunder. I appreciate the reading material. Her initial description was correct beyond the tooth being from C. auriculatus ... but it actually a C. subauriculatus (synonymous with chubutensis ?) is looking more probable. The constant shifting taxonomy on these teeth can be confusing for a newbie. Cheers, Brett Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abyssunder Posted August 18, 2017 Share Posted August 18, 2017 Some authors consider that this "equation" is valid: C. auriculatus = C. subauriculatus = C. angustidens = C. sokolovi 1 " We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. " Thomas Mann My Library Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brett Breakin' Rocks Posted August 18, 2017 Author Share Posted August 18, 2017 8 minutes ago, abyssunder said: Some authors consider that this "equation" is valid: C. auriculatus = C. subauriculatus = C. angustidens = C. sokolovi *sobs silently and quietly* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sixgill pete Posted August 19, 2017 Share Posted August 19, 2017 I agree that the tooth could be from Lee Creek, but I would not say definitely that it was. The size, shape, thickness and the cusps remind me of the mega shark teeth from the Belgrade Quarry in Mayesville N.C. The quarry there is Oligocene River Bend Formation and late Oligocene / early Miocene Belgrade Formation. The teeth from there are normally referred to as C. angustidens. I will say that the tooth is not C. auriculatus. To me the tooth more resembles C. angustidens than chubutensis. 1 Bulldozers and dirt Bulldozers and dirt behind the trailer, my desert Them red clay piles are heaven on earth I get my rocks off, bulldozers and dirt Patterson Hood; Drive-By Truckers May 2016 May 2012 Aug 2013, May 2016, Apr 2020 Oct 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now