Jump to content

Late Devonian plant


matgerke

Recommended Posts

Can any of the paleobotanists out there help me to identify this Late Devonian plant?  Found it in the Catskill formation, North of Harrisburg, PA.  I love the preservation and the coloration, but I don't know what I'm looking at!

20170902_180114.jpg

Correction: I first posted that this was "Middle Devonian".  On second look, the Catskill formation is "Late Devonian".  My bad.

Edited by matgerke
Correction
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know what it is but it sure is a keeper. Perhaps @fossilcrazy will know he is quite knowledgeable on these types of things.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it resembles Duodimidia pfefferkornii .

 

20170902_180114.jpg.93c2483d263fd826fec422fd8fc20a37.jpg.7caa539e230a9239474f2178055d13a0.jpg59ab33154185b_LateDevonianpaleontologyandpaleoenvironmentsatRedHilland.jpg.5ee779bae82f2bc02be96389daa28603.jpg

comparative picture from here

  • I found this Informative 1

" We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. "

Thomas Mann

My Library

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Matgerke, You have a nice example of a rarer form of Archaeopteris - A. macilenta. The diagnostic feature is the frayed edges of the leaflet. 

I submitted the same thing as May 2017 trying for IPFOTM.    

Leaves.JPG

clip_image006-10.jpg

  • I found this Informative 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, so now we have two different identifications for this specimen, Duodimidia pfefferkornii and an Archaeopteris species.  Can we try to zero in on the correct ID?  I did some quick research and found a couple of papers that could help.  Both species are found in Pennsylvania but Archaeopteris is apparently more common.  According to the first paper below, it serves as an index fossil for the Late Devonian.  But my impression is the photo of this specimen more closely resembles D. pfefferkornii.  The second paper below gives a description on page 97.  I'm not knowledgeable enough to make a determination myself, what do the experts think?

 

Paper 1: Devonian Red Hill PA.pdf

Paper 2: Devonian Red Hill PA-2.pdf

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, abyssunder said:

I think it resembles Duodimidia pfefferkornii .

 

20170902_180114.jpg.93c2483d263fd826fec422fd8fc20a37.jpg.7caa539e230a9239474f2178055d13a0.jpg59ab33154185b_LateDevonianpaleontologyandpaleoenvironmentsatRedHilland.jpg.5ee779bae82f2bc02be96389daa28603.jpg

comparative picture from here

Abbysunder's referenced paper above is another good one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have managed to find fossils in the catskill formation, which is a great accomplishment indeed! It's a very nice one too, most are little bits of coal but you found a nicely preserved piece! Nice find!

“...whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being evolved.” ~ Charles Darwin

Happy hunting,

Mason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all of these helpful ideas!

 

The one thing that makes me lean towards the Archaeopteris is that there is a thin, strongly visible stem that all the leaves branch from.  The Duodimidia seems to have a "fluffier" looking stem.  But of course, I'll wait for the experts on this one.

 

To answer @hauyn888 's question, this was pretty much the only thing I found, but I only spent maybe 20 minutes.  I was poking around in the scree of a road cut, and I found this and a couple of unimpressive brachiopods.  As this was in the height of summer, there were a whole lot of plants in the way.  I may go back in the spring before the plants take over.

 

Thanks again for all the assistance, everyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All are freely available on the web for consultation (as is the Guo & Wang,below).

a quotation from the Guo & Wang:

image.png.c8c24c1c40a9fe4e058b4abd0c398577.png

I keep repeating myself: Paleozoic plants need the help of ultrastructural detail for a correct determination

mkobiyfcragofis.jpg

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just for the heck of it, because of the unique coloration (from mineralization I assume), and because of some other catskill plant fossils localities being slightly unranium enriched it it might be fun to find someone with a geiger counter to scan this. It might not hurt to find a pdf of the Pa geologic Survey Report "Uranium Occurrences in PA" and see if your spot is reported or there is one nearby. I found some neat plant imprints with malachite coatings up river from you also in the Catskill Formation contact zone. PM me if you want the specific locality info. Nice find!!   

“Beautiful is what we see. More beautiful is what we understand. Most beautiful is what we do not comprehend.” N. Steno

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...