Tyrannah Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 I got this from a guy who found it at Montana the Hell Creek area. I was wondering if it was a Nanotyrannus Tooth or a different carnivore? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miocene_Mason Posted October 17, 2018 Share Posted October 17, 2018 Looks like a nanotyrannus to me, but I’m not a dinosaur tooth expert. “...whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being evolved.” ~ Charles Darwin Happy hunting, Mason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mburkett Posted October 17, 2018 Share Posted October 17, 2018 Yes it is. The “pinch” at the base is the giveaway, so it’s not Rex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ynot Posted October 17, 2018 Share Posted October 17, 2018 Let's see what @-Andy- and @hxmendoza or @Troodon think of it. Darwin said: " Man sprang from monkeys." Will Rogers said: " Some of them didn't spring far enough." My Fossil collection - My Mineral collection My favorite thread on TFF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaleoNoel Posted October 17, 2018 Share Posted October 17, 2018 Seems too thick to be Dromaeosaur, I agree with @WhodamanHD in the Nano ID. Although it could be rex. The cross section is what sways me towards nano. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mburkett Posted October 17, 2018 Share Posted October 17, 2018 It is too thick to be dromaeosaur,, and the serrations are the same size, meaning it’s tyrannosaurid. The pinch at the base rules Rex out, leaving Nano Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyrannah Posted October 17, 2018 Author Share Posted October 17, 2018 Thanks all, totally agree (did a bit of research myself) sadly the guy said it was a 'juvenile t rex back tooth' before I researched about it. But it was nano price luckily Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Andy- Posted October 17, 2018 Share Posted October 17, 2018 Tough one. The front and back view makes it look slightly thick, but the cross section is Nano. I would say it's a Nano. Looking forward to meeting my fellow Singaporean collectors! Do PM me if you are a Singaporean, or an overseas fossil-collector coming here for a holiday! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaimin013 Posted October 18, 2018 Share Posted October 18, 2018 The base in the last pic looks like a nano. A part of me wants to say rex due to the thickness but i'd say it's a nano tooth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now