Ludwigia Posted November 17, 2018 Share Posted November 17, 2018 15 minutes ago, Rockwood said: This would be roughly ten times the size of what I can find reports of from the paleozoic. It also seems odd that the thinnest part of the shell would leave the best recorded shape while the thicker elements seem to be nearly completely unpreserved. You've got some good points there. It could very well be some kind of cephalopod, but I still wasn't quite convinced. Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger http://www.steinkern.de/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now