edteach Posted February 2, 2019 Share Posted February 2, 2019 So one is obviouly a shell or I think its a shell, the other looks like a dragon fly wing but that is just to my untrained eye. The other has a lot of small things on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abyssunder Posted February 2, 2019 Share Posted February 2, 2019 I can see there fenestrate bryozoans, crinoid columnal facets, and maybe bivalve or brachiopod imprints. 4 " We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. " Thomas Mann My Library Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caldigger Posted February 2, 2019 Share Posted February 2, 2019 Mr. Blackbeard, you should get in the habit of stating where your items are found. This often times helps a lot in assisting with proper identification. That being said, I will agree with Abyssunder's assessment. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tidgy's Dad Posted February 2, 2019 Share Posted February 2, 2019 Agree with all of the above. And a tape measure or ruler for scale is good too. Life's Good! Tortoise Friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edteach Posted February 2, 2019 Author Share Posted February 2, 2019 Found in a creek near Rogers Ar. Size is about 2.5 inichs on the fenestrate bryozoans Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fossilcrazy Posted February 2, 2019 Share Posted February 2, 2019 The first specimen looks like Archaeocyathids. The rock would have to be Cambrian for that to be true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockwood Posted February 2, 2019 Share Posted February 2, 2019 2 hours ago, fossilcrazy said: The first specimen looks like Archaeocyathids. The rock would have to be Cambrian for that to be true. Were they crinoid columnals one can explain the lack of radial elements in the one to the upper right by proposing that the crenelations were worn away in the deposition process. Is there an equal or better explanation being an Archaeocyathid ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now