Kcee Posted August 16, 2019 Share Posted August 16, 2019 These things are very small and difficult to find but I came across a stone that was littered with hundreds of forams and these spicules. I don't recall seeing anything that look like a sponge so I'm very curious as to why there were so many of these spicules being found in this stone that was found in a desert. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted August 16, 2019 Share Posted August 16, 2019 Can't help with your question, but wanted to say how great the pictures came out! Well done! Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ynot Posted August 17, 2019 Share Posted August 17, 2019 The spicules are the "bones" of a sponge and are sometimes silica based (ie.. quartz) that will last longer than the soft body parts. So after the animal dies the soft parts decay leaving a concentration of the spicules. Neet finds. Darwin said: " Man sprang from monkeys." Will Rogers said: " Some of them didn't spring far enough." My Fossil collection - My Mineral collection My favorite thread on TFF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doctor Mud Posted August 17, 2019 Share Posted August 17, 2019 Like @ynot said, sponge spicules are silica and won’t decay or rot like the rest of the sponge so can survive as fossils long after the rest of the sponge is gone. Also, being very small they can be transported away from the site where sponges lived and died. It sounds like you are looking at marine sediments since there are forams. As an example I have recently been looking at marine sediments from a core on the shelf off the coast of Australia. There are no sponges living in this environment, but sponge spicules (and forams) are very common. Sponge spicules can also be common in freshwater lake deposits since there are freshwater sponges, but it is usually easy to distinguish between freshwater and marine deposits. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doctor Mud Posted August 17, 2019 Share Posted August 17, 2019 I realized I have an image of the Australia shelf sediments on my phone. This is what is left after the modern sediments have been treated with alkali to break them up and they have been sieved to remove the clays, there are loads of forams, but also sponge spicules. This is under a scope X40 magnification 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kcee Posted August 17, 2019 Author Share Posted August 17, 2019 Why thanks Fossildude19 and ynot... I find it very difficult to believe but these specimen could be over 2.5 millions years old. Wow, that's a lot of specimen in that one photo Doctor Mud, how many different types of forams and spicules were in that one sample? Anyone have any ideal as to what that thing is in the last 2 photos, I can't find anything that looks like it???????? - OMG!!!! ynot….. "Some of them didn't spring far enough"......I have not laughed this hard in a long time...thanks for the wonderful quotes....:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rumi Posted August 17, 2019 Share Posted August 17, 2019 Dr. Mud, your photo of the Australian shelf sediments looks most interesting. There are two clear specimens of Spiroloculina, a miliolid genus that appeared in the Jurassic and continues on in the seas of today. Murray illustrates two species from Britain, for example. As for the sponge spicules: there seems to be no way to associate them with actual sponge species of the past. The many different types of spicules have been named, however. Rumi 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Austen Posted August 18, 2019 Share Posted August 18, 2019 That photo turned out great, eh? What are you using to get that picture? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kcee Posted August 19, 2019 Author Share Posted August 19, 2019 Hi Austen....All of the photos I posted above were taken with a celestron digital microscope. The magnification was 40X to 160X. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doctor Mud Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 On 17/08/2019 at 3:02 PM, Kcee said: Wow, that's a lot of specimen in that one photo Doctor Mud, how many different types of forams and spicules were in that one sample? It is isn't it! We haven't looked at the forams yet, I'm not sure someone is lined up to do it yet. The forams are so well preserved and appear (at least to me) to be quite diverse. I normally work on freshwater sediments so I haven't looked at forams since 3rd year during my Geology degree! This sediment was collected to look at the history of harmful algal blooms off the coast of Australia, mainly using fossil dinoflagellate cysts and ancient DNA. My job is to look at the geochemistry of the mud and to age the core using radiocarbon and lead-210. I took these pictures when I was picking out thigs to radiocarbon date. Like @Rumi said - sponge spicules see, to be not useful for identifying species as the forms are common to many different species. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doctor Mud Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 On 18/08/2019 at 1:13 AM, Rumi said: Dr. Mud, your photo of the Australian shelf sediments looks most interesting. There are two clear specimens of Spiroloculina, a miliolid genus that appeared in the Jurassic and continues on in the seas of today. Murray illustrates two species from Britain, for example. As for the sponge spicules: there seems to be no way to associate them with actual sponge species of the past. The many different types of spicules have been named, however. Rumi Thanks @Rumi The preservation and diversity of forams is wonderful in this sediment. I'm looking at the geochemistry and dating the cores, someone is looking at ancient DNA, and someone diatoms and dinoflagellate cysts. No-one is looking at the forams yet, but it sure would make a nice project for someone. We "only" collected 3 m of core which dates back about 12,000 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doctor Mud Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 On 17/08/2019 at 3:02 PM, Kcee said: Anyone have any ideal as to what that thing is in the last 2 photos, I can't find anything that looks like it???????? I thought maybe an echinoid (sea urchin) spine or part of the echinoid Aristotle Lantern? Is it a tube? I was trying to figure out the 3D shape from the photos. @JohnJ ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kcee Posted August 20, 2019 Author Share Posted August 20, 2019 I can only guess about that strange specimen, I did find a lot of echinoid spines with it so it may very well be something from that family. I have looked at thousands of photos of forams but have not seen anything even close to it. It appears to be solid all the way through. I think I may have a few echinoid spines, I'll see if I can dig them up and post a few. Wow, Doctor Mud, there has be a ton of forams in the cores you have collected, make sure you don't toss any of those. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rumi Posted August 31, 2019 Share Posted August 31, 2019 Dr. Mud, I forgot to mention that your sample photo seems to have some ostracode valves in it, too. Fossil ostracodes are very useful for age determinations. Rumi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now