Jump to content

Mosasaur Jaws


Quintius

Recommended Posts

Welcome to the forum :)

 

As a policy, the forum does not give appraisals. But if you want you could take a look at various sellers and see how much people commonly sell them for. ;) As for the authenticity of the jaws in question, much of both seem real to me, although I personally have a looming suspicion that some of the teeth in the top jaw may have been composited/chimera'ed. However, I am just an enthusiast and it would be best to wait for an actual expert to take a look.

 

 

If you're a fossil nut from Palos Verdes, San Pedro, Redondo Beach, or Torrance, feel free to shoot me a PM!

 

 

Mosasaurus_hoffmannii_skull_schematic.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moved to the IS IT REAL Forum.

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed, the bone looks good to me, but some of the teeth look to be composited. It's hard to be certain without close ups, but I can see what looks like filler between some of the teeth and the bone. However, all teeth look to be Prognathodon sp. at least. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like real bone. But this single photo is completely insufficient to say anything conclusive about the teeth. We'll need better photos and closeups to judge at all really.

Olof Moleman AKA Lord Trilobite

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As suggested by the previous responders, making a judgement based on the provided photo alone is an endeavor prone to error. However, given the available resource, I like the pictured jaw sections and think them to be nice, natural specimens. In part, my impression is based on the following. Note the several teeth in the upper piece that display fractures. To my eye they appear to be natural breaks with the pieces remaining properly aligned, matrix infill occupying the small spaces. This configuration would be difficult to reproduce by a person setting in unrelated teeth. In such an incident, it would be much easier to glue fractured teeth together sans matrix, prior to inlay. This would provide a much different appearance. The teeth also have small areas where the matrix overlaps the exposed tooth. Not impossible to fake, but an unlikely time consuming detail for a forger. I count 4 replacement teeth in the larger piece. These teeth partially obscured by matrix and bone are yet another detail that suggests authenticity to me. Such an appearance might be accomplished by a skilled faker, but why would they go into such tedious detail? A spurious jaw section could be produced and sold (and many are) with far less effort. Anyway, from what can be seen, I like the pieces and look forward to seeing other opinions. Perhaps better more detailed pictured would help.

Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, also are remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so. - Douglas Adams, Last Chance to See

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...