Jump to content
  • Ophiopsiella procera (Agassiz, 1843)


    Images:

    oilshale

    Taxonomy

    Kingdom: ANIMALIA
    Phylum: CHORDATA Haeckel, 1874
    Class: ACTINOPTERI Cope, 1871
    Order: IONOSCOPIFORMES Grande and Bemis, 1998
    Family: OPHIOPSIDAE Bartram, 1975
    Genus: Ophiopsiella
    Species: Ophiopsiella procera
    Author Citation (Agassiz, 1843)

    Geological Time Scale

    Eon: Phanerozoic
    Era: Mesozoic
    Period: Jurassic
    Sub Period: None
    Epoch: Late
    International Age: Tithonian

    Stratigraphy

    Weissjura Group
    Altmühltal Formation

    Biostratigraphy

    Hybonoticeras hybonotum Zone
    Lithacoceras riedense Subzone

    Provenance

    Acquired by: Purchase/Trade

    Dimensions

    Length: 14 cm

    Location

    Blumenberg
    Eichstätt District
    Bavaria
    Germany

    Comments

    The genus previously known as Ophiopsis Agassiz, 1834 (except Ophiopsis muensteri Agassiz, 1834), was reassigned by Lane & Ebert 2015 to Ophiopsiella.

    Taxonomy from Lane & Ebert 2015.
    Lane & Ebert 2015, p. e883238-4 :”Diagnosis—The genus Ophiopsiella is characterized by the following unique combination of features: medium-sized halecomorph fishes with body depth increased anteriorly to form a low hump and tapering posteriorly; parietals equal in length to dermopterotics; antorbitals do not reach the orbit; lacrimal large and deep; *low number of suborbitals with ventral-most suborbital represented by a single large bone (rather than numerous small bones); rostral with lateral horns; posterior infraorbital inclined posterodorsally; preopercle reaches dorsal border of opercle; subopercular with anterior dorsal extension; dermopterotic deep posteriorly and tapering anteriorly; single, undivided dorsal fin; vertebrae lacking posterior fossae; scales have posterior serrations; dorsal fin elongate, occupying over one-third of the dorsal body length, tapering posteriorly; caudal fin forked; *17–19 caudal fin rays; main lateral line continuing into a row of small ossicles between the seventh and eighth caudal fin rays; scales thick, rhomboidal, not deeper than broad; pelvic fins opposite the midpoint of the dorsal fin; *high number (14C) of caudal peduncle scales; posterior border of dorsal fin opposite anal fin; robust maxilla with a shallow posterior notch; lateral line pores located within scale borders (not forming a posterior notch); and basal and fringing fulcra present on both dorsal and ventral lobes of caudal fin.”

    Lane & Ebert 2015, p. e883238-4: “Emended Species Diagnosis—Ophiopsiella with *44 vertical scale rows from postcleithra to hinge line; 24–25 dorsal fin rays; 18–19 principal caudal fin rays; *anteriormost four dorsal fin rays extremely elongated compared with subsequent rays, forming a crescent-shaped concave curve posteriorly; *caudal fin deeply forked posteriorly; posttemporal, extrascapular, and postcleithra serrated posteriorly; anterodorsal body scales serrated along their entire posterior border; prominent predorsal hump with maximum body depth at dorsal fin origin.
    Pterygial formula:
    image.png.548ef69a6bb6ad7826a68ee629b4e30f.png"

    References:
    Agassiz, L. 1834. Abgerissene Bemerkungen über fossile Fische. pp. 379–390 in: von Leonhard, K. C. & Bronn, H. G. (eds.): Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geognosie, Geologie und Petrefaktenkunde, 1834 (4). E. Schweitzbarts Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart.
    Lane, J. A. & Ebert, M., 2015: A taxonomic reassessment of Ophiopsis (Halecomorphi, Ionoscopiformes), with a revision of Upper Jurassic species from the Solnhofen Archipelago, and a new genus of Ophiopsidae. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 35 (1): e883238. doi: 10.1080/02724634.2014.883238




    User Feedback


    Love the scale pattern on this fossil but correct me if I'm wrong, has the dorsal and tail been added to with paint?

     

    Ron

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    oilshale

    Posted (edited)

    On 9/14/2022 at 1:01 PM, RJB said:

    Love the scale pattern on this fossil but correct me if I'm wrong, has the dorsal and tail been added to with paint?

     

    Ron

    Hi Ron,
    I know this looks a little funky, but dorsal and caudal fin are ok. Only behind the anal fin and at the beginning of the caudal fin a few scales are missing. There I have darkened the substrate a little bit.

    Edited by oilshale

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...