Jump to content

Southern Comfort

  • entries
    31
  • comments
    101
  • views
    103,761

The Lower Pinecrest Beds, Tamiami Formation


MikeR

7,227 views

Three million years ago the Mid-Piacenzian warming stage was in effect for South Florida. The cool water fauna exemplified by Chesapecten found in Bed 11 of the Tamiami Formation was replaced by a warmer more diverse fauna, which formed extremely fossiliferous shell beds in the Sarasota and Kissimmee River regions of Florida. These deposits are called the Pinecrest beds after the tiny city of Pinecrest, Florida where they were first described by Axel Olsson in 1964. The Pinecrest is known to form 11 distinct beds that have a tendency to be dominated by one or two species (fig. 1) and together have the highest diversity of any shell deposit in the United States with an estimated total of 1000-1200 different molluscan species.

As described by Ed Petuch in 1982, the Pinecrest shell beds at the famous APAC pit were as follows:

Bed 1 Lower Pleistocene Caloosahatchee fauna

Bed 2 Layer of the oyster Hyotissa haitensis

Bed 3 Sandy layer with double valved Mytilus conradiana

Bed 4 The Black layer. A shell bed with a brackish water fauna stained black from sulfide reduction. Richest vertebrate fauna above bed 11.

Bed 5 A layer of the filter feeding gastropods Vermicularia recta

Bed 6/7 The thickest and most diverse shell bed

Bed 8 Vermicularia recta

Bed 9 Layer of Hyotissa haitensis

Bed 10 Rich and diverse shell bed.

Bed 11 Colder water fauna including Ecphora and Chesapecten.

blogentry-1906-0-80493400-1330805938.jpg blogentry-1906-0-65350200-1330805973.jpg blogentry-1906-0-85063500-1330806004.jpg

Figure 1. Diagnostic fossil shells from the Pinecrest Beds of the Tamiami Formation. From left to right: Mytilus conradiana (d'Orbingny, 1852) Bed 3; Vermicularia recta Olsson & Harbinson, 1953 Bed 8; Hyotissa haitensis (Sowerby, 1850) Bed 9. All from Locality 92, APAC Mine, Sarasota County, Florida.

As popular as these deposits are for the fossil shell collector, their geology and paleontology are a mess. Formations are described based on the lithology (type of rocks) and uncomformities (time gaps) not their fossils and yet numerous formations of similar lithology and members of patchy distribution have been named based solely on fossil content. Four distinct biozones, however do occur which document three extinction events, two of which had significant fauna turnover. My personal impression of Florida geology is that it is like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. So many changes were occurring during the Florida Plio-Pleistocene that it is difficult to apply conventional rules. Add to the mix a plethora of books aimed at the amateur market that excessively split species and make ecological interpretations that are not backed by experimental proof or peer-review. With all of the taxonomic splitting that has occurred, many hundreds of species are listed as extinct giving the impression that today’s Floridian fauna is much diminished from the Pliocene. Comparison of valid Pliocene species with the modern Floridian molluscan fauna however, shows a near equal number of species between the two. Also with the inflated number of species reported from the Pinecrest beds comes the assumption that the supposed increased diversity in the Pliocene must have been due to tropical conditions. Isotopic studies by Warren Allmon of the Paleontological Research Institute discounts warmer Pliocene water temperature and suggests that the Gulf was slightly cooler due to seasonal upwelling of nutrient rich deep water.

Ed Petuch has described endemic faunas from each Pinecrest Bed which is not supported by most modern-day stratigraphers and paleontologists, but I did not know this when I first identified my APAC finds. My original intent with this blog was to post a new field trip each month but when I jumped into the Tamiami Formation I knew that it was going to be awhile before I would be posting again. I didn’t know at the time it would take me almost a year to accurately identify my collection using classical publications by Dall, Mansfield, and Olsson and tying it all together with the recent work of Lyle Campbell and Lauck Ward. In reporting on these shell beds, I have settled on a general stratigraphic classification similar to that used by Warren Allmon. I call Beds 5-10 the Lower Pinecrest which is separated from Beds 2-4, the Upper Pinecrest, by a gap of tens of thousands of years. In this post I will be reporting on the Lower Pinecrest and describe the Upper Beds when I write about the Pliocene extinction.

In my last post, I described a cool water fauna from lowest bed of the Pinecrest, Bed 11 exposed in a Sarasota County quarry (locality 1016). This layer showed that animal life in Florida was similar to that in the Yorktown Formation of the Mid-Atlantic States which was being deposited at the same time. The succeeding layer Bed 10 also exposed in the same quarry shows significant differences. Whales and sharks which were found in abundance in Bed 11, disappeared due to decreased ocean productivity from the continued closure of the Isthmus of Panama. A thick shell bed began accumulating containing species influenced more from the tropics than from the Yorktown fauna. Large shells are common here as well as warm-water genera such as Strombus, Oliva, Conus, and Cypraea (fig. 2).

blogentry-1906-0-23382000-1330808039.jpg blogentry-1906-0-93386700-1330813896.jpg blogentry-1906-0-70461200-1330813859.jpg blogentry-1906-0-38450000-1330813878.jpg blogentry-1906-0-20459200-1330813911.jpg

Figure 2. Fossil Shells from Pinecrest Bed 10 at locality 1016. Left to right: Prepared shells; Phyllontous globosus (Emmons, 1858); Sinistrofulgur contrarium (Conrad, 1840); Melongena consors (Sowerby, 1850); Hystrivasum locklini (Olsson & Harbinson, 1953).

Another pit within the same quarry complex (locality 1017) exposed Bed 6/7, the thickest and most diverse of the Pinecrest Beds (fig. 3). These beds accumulated by the concentration of shells due to tides and storms in depressions formed by karst within the underlying Miocene sediments. Currents were constantly washing and re-exposing dead shells while concentrating newer material on top of the old. Corals, barnacles, and bryozoa are also found as well as fragments of more delicate organisms such as crabs and echinoids. Coral in Bed 6/7 tend to be concentrated in certain layers where they lived during a time of less silt and sedimentation. The water however was under the influence silicicastic sediment from the ancestral Myakka and Kissimmee Rivers which was not condusive to coral reef formation. One coral however thrived due to an interesting lifestyle. Free floating Septastrea marylandica larva settled on hermit crab inhabited gastropod shells. The constant motion of the shell by the moving crab did not allow sediment to deposit on top of coral growing upon the shell. All three, crab, gastropod and coral must have made an interesting site (fig. 4).

blogentry-1906-0-80115400-1330808090.jpg blogentry-1906-0-30863600-1330808122.jpg blogentry-1906-0-71841000-1330808144.jpg blogentry-1906-0-34145400-1330808061.jpg blogentry-1906-0-06821800-1330808343.jpg blogentry-1906-0-09468000-1330808176.jpg

Figure 3. Pinecrest Bed 6/7, Locality 1017, Sarasota County, Florida. From left to right: Views of Bed 6/7 spoil piles; Fossil shells from Bed 6/7, Turbinella streami Petuch, 1994 in situ and prepared.

blogentry-1906-0-76987400-1330811989.jpg blogentry-1906-0-08756900-1330812010.jpg blogentry-1906-0-15680300-1330812026.jpg

Figure 4. Corals from the Upper Pliocene Lower Pinecrest Beds, Sarasota County, Florida. Large corals from Bed 6/7 clockwise from back Solenastrea hyades (Dana, 1846), Oculina sarasotana Wiesbord, 1974, Siderastrea pliocenica Vaughn, 1919, Favia fragum (Esper, 1868); Sepastrea marylandica (Conrad, 1837) encrusted gastropods; Heilprinia caloosaensis carolinensis (Dall, 1892) encrusted with S. marylandica. All from Locality 92, APAC Mine, Sarasota, Florida.

In past posts I have organized fauna lists based upon location. Since I re-identified all species from each of my Pinecrest sites (localities 92, 901, 911, 912, 913, 916, 1016, 1017), I have decided to put everything together into one big list. I have within my collection 162 bivalves and 290 gastropods from all of the Pinecrest Beds combined.

Gastropods Upper Pliocene Pinecrest Beds.pdf

Bivalves Upper Pliocene Pinecrest Beds.pdf

REFERENCES

Allmon, Warren D. 1992. Whence Southern Florida’s Plio-Pleistocene shell beds? Plio-Pleistocene Stratigraphy and Paleontology of Southern Florida, Florida Geological Survey Special Publication No. 36.

Allmon, Warren D; Rosenberg, Gary; Portell, Roger W.; and Schindler , Kevin S. 1993. Diversity of Atlantic Coastal Plain Mollusks since the Pliocene. Science, vol. 260:1626-1629.

Allmon, Warren D; Emslie, Steven D.; Jones, Douglas S.; and Morgan , Gary S. 1996. Late Neogene Oceanographic change along Florida’s West Coast: Evidence and mechanisms. The Journal of Geology, vol. 104:143-162.

Campbell, Lyle. 1993. Pliocene Molluscs from the Yorktown and Chowan River Formations in Virginia. Virginia Division of Mineral Resources Publication 127.

Dall W.H. 1890-1903. Contributions to the Tertiary Fauna of Florida, with Especial Reference to the Miocene Silex-Beds of Tampa and the Pliocene Beds of the Caloosahatchie River, Part I: Pulmonate, Opisthobranchiate and Orthodont Gastropods, Transactions of the Wagner Free Institute of Science of Philadelphia 3(1-VI).

Gardner, J. A. 1944. Mollusca from the Miocene and Lower Pliocene of Virginia and North Carolina: Part 1. Pelecypoda, United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 199-A: iv, pages 1-178, plates 1-23

Gardner, J. A. 1948. Mollusca from the Miocene and Lower Pliocene of Virginia and North Carolina: Part 2. Scaphopoda and Gastropoda, United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 199-B: iv, pages 179-310, plates 24-38, [iii]

Gardner, J. A. and T.H. Aldrich. 1919. Mollusca from the Upper Miocene of South Carolina: with Descriptions of New Species. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 71: pages 17-53.

Jones, Douglas S and Allmon, Warren D. 1999. Pliocene marine temperatures on the West Coast of Florida: Estimates from mollusk shell stable isotopes In J.H. Wrenn, J.-P. Suc, and S.A.G. Leroy, eds., The Pliocene: Time of Change. American Association of Stratigraphic Palynologists Foundation, Dallas, Texas, pp. 241-250.

Mansfield, W.C. 1930. Miocene Gastropods and Scaphopods of the Choctawhatchee Formation of Florida, Florida Geological Survey Bulletin 3, 189 pages.

Mansfield, W.C. 1931. Some tertiary mollusks from southern Florida. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, v. 79.

Mansfield, W.C. 1932. Miocene Pelecypods of the Choctawhatchee Formation of Florida, Florida Geological Survey Bulletin 8, 233 pages.

Missimer, Thomas M. 1992. Stratigraphic relationships of sediment facies within the Tamiami Formation of Southwest Florida: Proposed intraformational correlations. Plio-Pleistocene Stratigraphy and Paleontology of Southern Florida, Florida Geological Survey Special Publication No. 36.

Olsson, A.A. 1967 (1993 Reprint). Some Tertiary Mollusks from South Florida and the Caribbean, Originally - Bulletins of American Paleontology 54(242), The Paleontological Research Institute Special Publication 19: pages 11-75, 9 plates

Olsson, A.A., and A. Harbison. 1953 (1990 Reprint). Pliocene Mollusca of Southern Florida with Special Reference to Those from North Saint Petersburg, with special chapters on Turridae by W.G. Fargo and Vitinellidae and Fresh-water Mollusks by H.A. Pilsbry, The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia Monographs 8, The Shell Museum and Educational Foundation, 457 pages, 65 plates

Olsson, A.A., and R.E. Petit. 1964. Some Neogene Mollusca from Florida and the Carolinas, Bulletins of American Paleontology 47(217): pages 509-574, plates 77-83

Olsson, A.A., and R.E. Petit. 1968 (1993 Reprint). Notes on Siphocypraea, Originally - Special Publication 9, The Paleontological Research Institute Special Publication 19: pages 77-88.

Petuch, E.J. 1982. Notes on the molluscan paleontology of the Pinecrest Beds at Sarasota, Florida with the description of Pyruella, a stratigraphically important new genus: Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, v. 134, p. 12–30.

Petuch, Edward J. 1994. Atlas of Florida Fossil Shells (Pliocene and Pleistocene Marine Gastropods). Chicago Spectrum Press.

Petuch, Edward J. 2004. Cenozoic Seas. CRC Press.

Petuch, Edward J. 2007. The Geology of the Everglades and Adjacent Areas. CRC Press.

Tucker, H.I. and Druid Wilson. 1932. Some new or otherwise interesting fossils from the Florida Tertiary. Bulletins of American paleontology; v. 18: no. 65.

Tucker, H.I. and Druid Wilson. 1933. A second contribution to the Neogene paleontology of South Florida. Bulletins of American paleontology; v. 18: no. 66.

Tuomey, M., and F.S. Holmes. 1855-1856 ( 1974 Reprint). Pleiocene Fossils of South-Carolina: Containing Descriptions and Figures of the Polyparia, Echinodermata and Mollusca, Original pages 1-30 and plates 1-12 published in 1855, Original pages 31-152 and plates 13-30 published in 1856, The Paleontological Research Institution Special Publication 12: xvi, 152 pages, 30 plates, [addendum]

Ward, Lauck W. 1992. Diagnostic Mollusks from the APAC Pit, Sarasota, Florida in Plio-Pleistocene Stratigraphy and Paleontology of Southern Florida, Florida Geological Survey Special Publication No. 36.

Ward, Lauck W. 1993. Pliocene Stratigraphy and Biostratigraphy, Virginia to Florida in The Neogene of Florida and Adjacent Regions, Florida Geological Survey Special Publication No. 37.

  • I found this Informative 3

4 Comments


Recommended Comments

masonboro37

Posted

Thank you for sharing this. Not only do you have some splendid specimes, but your entire post and references have been very helpful!

Link to comment
minnbuckeye

Posted

Great report. First time I have seen this. Puts many things in perspective!!  

 

Mike

Link to comment

Hi,

 

Marvelous article ! Thanks !

 

Coco

Link to comment
×
×
  • Create New...