Jump to content

Three Pennsylvanian Spiders


Missourian

Recommended Posts

I'm hoping someone here can id these -- at least at the generic level....

Body is 16 mm long:

post-6808-0-10698400-1358417491_thumb.jpg

Body is 8 mm long:

post-6808-0-26141000-1358496700_thumb.jpg

Body is 10 mm long:

post-6808-0-11276100-1358496707_thumb.jpg

They are all from the upper Cherokee Group (Desmoinesian / upper Moscovian) at Knob Noster, Missouri. I believe they are close to the level of the Mazon Creek deposits.

Edited by Missourian

Context is critical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't help on the ID front, but man, those are cool!

Regards,

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Missourian,

These are some wicked cool Trigonotarbids! Great pictures of them too!

1) Looks like Phalangiotarbus.

2) I'd agree with a ventral Architarbus.

3) ???

I'll try hard for that third one but these guys are tough. There just isn't a lot known about them.

Edited by AgrilusHunter

"They ... savoured the strange warm glow of being much more ignorant than ordinary people, who were only ignorant of ordinary things."

-- Terry Pratchett

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ventral specimen reminds me of the Mazon Creek genus: Architarbus. spider.gif

post-4301-0-09256000-1358552021_thumb.jpg

Hi Missourian,

These are some wicked cool Trigonotarbids! Great pictures of them too!

1) Looks like Phalangiotarbus.

2) I'd agree with a ventral Architarbus.

3) ???

I'll try hard for that third one but these guys are tough. There just isn't a lot known about them.

Thanks for the id's. Because these guys are so diverse and hard to track down in the literature, I figured I just let the fellow forum members have all the fun. :)

AgrilusHunter, I'm glad you can't yet id #3. That means it must be rare. It is my best spider, after all. :)

Edited by Missourian

Context is critical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

... AgrilusHunter, I'm glad you can't yet id #3. That means it must be rare ...

Oh dear! I don't know about that, I sure hope it's something special though. It is an amazing specimen but I've only seen a few of these guys at the Field Musuem, online, and in manuscripts. I'm far from an expert on the group. RCfossils or fiddlehead have likely seen many more, they may recognize features in the last specimen and be able to give you a good identification. You may also want to contact Dr. Russel Garwood in the UK. Your images are very good and he may be able to give you much more information about these particular fossils. I have to say Trigonotarbids are my favorite fossils in nodules, even beyond the insects. So little is known about these early land predators and I find them just fascinating! If anyone wants to see what these guys likely looked like check out the basal order of arachnids Ricinulei. These guys have the same three divisions in the dorsal segmentation as the Trigonotarbids.

"They ... savoured the strange warm glow of being much more ignorant than ordinary people, who were only ignorant of ordinary things."

-- Terry Pratchett

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh dear! I don't know about that, I sure hope it's something special though. It is an amazing specimen but I've only seen a few of these guys at the Field Musuem, online, and in manuscripts. I'm far from an expert on the group.

I didn't mean to put you on the spot. I was just sayin'. :)

Context is critical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No worries. :) Those really are some rare and exquisite fossils! Thanks for showing them here on the Forum. I hope you can get identifcations for all of them as your images are easily some of the nicest available for Trigonotarbids anywhere online.

Edited by AgrilusHunter

"They ... savoured the strange warm glow of being much more ignorant than ordinary people, who were only ignorant of ordinary things."

-- Terry Pratchett

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Edit: Oops.... forgot the scale. I added the body length in mm to each image

Context is critical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very nice specimens... Ive sent you a contact...

all I can say is wow!! excellent specimens

"A man who stares at a rock must have a lot on his mind... or nothing at all'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Beautiful and unusual to me! Did you find those recently? :popcorn::envy:

I acquired them from the landowner several years ago. I'd love to stumble across a deposit like that. :)

Context is critical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great specimens and great pictures!

I love your Knob Noster material and wish i had purchased more fauna from the deposit when i had the opportunity.

All three specimens appear to me to be Phalangiotarbids. I cannot make out any defiing characteristics to identify them to the genus level.

Perhaps an arachnid expert will be able to go further with them.

Thanks for sharing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I keep reading that insects from this period were so large but these are closer to modern insects in size. I'm wondering, when we look at St. Clair and other Carboniferous/Pennsylvanian sites, are we looking for foot long dragonflies, or 8 mm arachnids?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I keep reading that insects from this period were so large but these are closer to modern insects in size. I'm wondering, when we look at St. Clair and other Carboniferous/Pennsylvanian sites, are we looking for foot long dragonflies, or 8 mm arachnids?

Hi hitekmastr,

Look for both. Technically, these are not insects and they have a very different respiration system. Insects use an internal network of thin tubes connected to openings (spiracles) along their body for respiration. Spiders, and their past relatives the trigonotarbids, use a modified gill like respiratory system called book lungs. These morphological differences may or may not have produced a different effect in the higher oxygen environment (if that was even the cause of the insect gigantism). Regardless, there was a whole range of terrestrial arthropod body sizes on display in the Pennsylvanian, one should be open for just about anything.

"They ... savoured the strange warm glow of being much more ignorant than ordinary people, who were only ignorant of ordinary things."

-- Terry Pratchett

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I keep reading that insects from this period were so large but these are closer to modern insects in size. I'm wondering, when we look at St. Clair and other Carboniferous/Pennsylvanian sites, are we looking for foot long dragonflies, or 8 mm arachnids?

The little spiders may just be the ones that were preserved in the nodules. Larger arthropods at Knob Noster, such as some eurypterids, tend to be fragmentary.

Context is critical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The little spiders may just be the ones that were preserved in the nodules. Larger arthropods at Knob Noster, such as some eurypterids, tend to be fragmentary.

Great point! Preservation bias can make all the difference.

Edited by AgrilusHunter

"They ... savoured the strange warm glow of being much more ignorant than ordinary people, who were only ignorant of ordinary things."

-- Terry Pratchett

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...