vellis Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 Found this right at the top of the Austin chalk, where it meets the Ozan (upper cretaceous) in a Creek in Garland, Texas. It is about 5 or 6 inches in diameter. Anyone know what kind of Ammonite it is? Thanks, Van. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Siphuncle Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 possibly pachydiscus? hard to tell while viewing from my phone. Grüße, Daniel A. Wöhr aus Südtexas "To the motivated go the spoils." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobWill Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 Hard to tell without sutures but the age and closely spaced ribs suggest that Dan is right with pachydiscus. Does it have a rounded venter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vellis Posted August 3, 2013 Author Share Posted August 3, 2013 I think I would call it a slightly rounded venter. The venter is close to that of an Oxytropidoceras ammonite that I have. Altogether, as a whole, it looks fairly close to an Oxy ammonite, but the ribs are spaced closer and I know Oxy is found in lower Cretaceous. Help any? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Siphuncle Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 A shot of the keel would help, in an area where the ribs are best pronounced. Grüße, Daniel A. Wöhr aus Südtexas "To the motivated go the spoils." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobWill Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 Some oxys have closer rib spacing but the venter is usually high and with a strong keel and certainly shouldn't be in the Cenomanian as you said. The venter of a pachydiscus would be much rounder. There are some less common ammos with closely spaced ribs from the Eagle Ford, maybe someone who knows them will respond. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnJ Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 Based on the geology and size, you might consider one of the Parapuzosia species. The human mind has the ability to believe anything is true. - JJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Siphuncle Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 Ahh yes, Parapuzosia is also a valid consideration. I'd check that closely if you are sure it is from the Austin, and look hard at Pachydiscus if you think there's a chance its Ozan. The two forms are pretty distinct. Grüße, Daniel A. Wöhr aus Südtexas "To the motivated go the spoils." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vertman Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 Good find. How certain are you that the Ozan was exposed above the layer where you found this? If it is the creek I think it might be I have always somewhat questioned the geology there. It may be the same creek I dug a 48 inch diameter ammononite out of several years ago. It does not seem like Austin. It may be one of the chalks from the lower part of the Taylor Group. But if that is true I don't know what happened to the Ozan in the eastern part of Garland. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now