Jump to content

Back to the Fox Hills Formation June 2 Trip Report


Thomas.Dodson

Recommended Posts

I had the opportunity to get out to my favorite area of the Fox Hills Formation last week right before the temp skyrocketed into the 100s. I returned to my favorite Timber Lake site as well as tried some new ones.

 

The first site I tried on the way down was not an exposure of the Fox Hills at all but probably of the Cannonball Formation, at least in part. I didn't find anything at this site but it was pretty nonetheless.

 

IMG_8152.thumb.JPG.1c76c2747f79a5706e82fd1a3854ca2c.JPG

 

 

There's lots of exposed Fox Hills sandstone at my favorite Timber Lake site but the fossils are not as well preserved as those in the concretions. The concretions are often spectacular. This is from the site I describe as Timber Lake Exposure 1 in other threads. I did collect some small concretions pictured later. No large ones but there wasn't much erosion this year due to the dry weather and the lack of snow melt from the mild winter.

 

1.png.b2603b00de870c3d8a203aa905940ce6.png

IMG_8154.thumb.JPG.d6ab5f4ed349db0376960bcc13427db7.JPG

 

This new site exposes more of the brackish portion of the Fox Hills Formation. There was tan and salt and pepper sandstone with sparse fossils throughout. The interesting thing was the white-gray claystones and shales exposed at the top of some hills. There were sparse fossils here as well that I took the time to collect just because it is unusual for the area. I haven't prepared anything from it yet. I think most, if not all, specimens were Protocardia subquadrata.

 

2.png.6083133934509822adfa53d976b99ea0.png

6.png.ee8618dd5b2b8fd7aebaf95a6b8f4683.png

3.png.84074281c01b601909dcbf09c17235c2.png

5.png.44e3087d2a53aad0ebbc98844f88105b.png

4.png.c910012fe0c599e8893e5b10be8e0d28.png

 

 

I got around to preparing some of the stuff from the Timber Lake exposure. The ammonites in the overlying sandstone layers are typically "pancaked" flat.

 

IMG_8190.thumb.JPG.9af9cd17e8aff0250788c62e6f2ec42b.JPG

 

Typical concretionary material from the site with the abundant wood that is typical of the exposure.

 

IMG_8180.thumb.JPG.4c3bc26dbc76a40b6b89a31acd74154a.JPG

IMG_8179.thumb.JPG.b720a26dbc6135728f4c64337460d27e.JPG

 

Typical immature Scaphitid ammonites.

 

IMG_8186.thumb.JPG.491922ff9e933dc536b047e2c9278baa.JPG

 

Just a portion of the body chamber.

 

IMG_8187.thumb.JPG.07508e3406e90d73c72f960752754fe3.JPG

 

A rather large and robust Cylichna scitula.

 

IMG_8189.thumb.JPG.ef43b2098662fe9f7d6a14a1b3a00ab5.JPG

IMG_8188.thumb.JPG.64b01e67d544c5c9a67745bc0ea1aa95.JPG

 

Aptychus.

 

IMG_8183.thumb.JPG.5e71fac5ec9f2e66a279ad3eda8242e8.JPG

 

 

A swirly crystal Oligopytycha concinna. Ones missing the outer shell are common because of how the outer shell sticks to the concretion.

 

  IMG_8192.thumb.JPG.cbaffeee741fcdeea20e31049fc20fc0.JPG

IMG_8191.thumb.JPG.bae1b8417b1d675b24735149a05ffdac.JPG

 

Various other typical specimens are present in the concretions collected but I haven't had the time to prepare them yet. No larger ammonites are likely to be found as the concretions usually split along the plane of the largest ammonites but there may yet be some rarer small specimens present. This particular site has yielded crab fossils, a shark tooth, and many rare mollusc specimens. It's just a matter of finding time to continue preparing the concretions.

 

  • I found this Informative 3
  • Enjoyed 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Thomas.Dodson said:

No larger ammonites are likely to be found as the concretions usually split along the plane of the largest ammonites

 

Wouldn't it be possible to glue them back together and then prep them out?

 

Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger

http://www.steinkern.de/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ludwigia said:

 

Wouldn't it be possible to glue them back together and then prep them out?

I might not have explained that properly. What I meant is that the concretions usually split over the largest ammonites. Since these concretions split over the smaller ammonites it most likely means there aren't any larger ones in the rest of the concretion. The ammonites themselves usually remain intact, which is good because these concretions are usually so hard and so packed with fossils it isn't practical to prep from the outside in.

  • I found this Informative 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those are some fine looking fossils!  

 

Thanks for sharing!  :Smiling:

 

Edited by fossilhunter21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for sharing.  I love the combination of scenery and fossils.

The White Queen  ".... in her youth she could believe "six impossible things before breakfast"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those Scaphitid ammonites and gastropods are lovely. Congratulations. Certainly worth the considerable effort to collect and prep them. Thanks for sharing your specimens, knowledge, and site photographs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for the trip photos.

 

 

Mark.

 

Fossil hunting is easy -- they don't run away when you shoot at them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/7/2021 at 10:41 PM, Thomas.Dodson said:

...but there may yet be some rarer small specimens present.

It is fun when you're right. I spy something unusual.

IMG_8201.thumb.JPG.837eeeda94b8295ed43c65a28dc64a32.JPG

A little shark tooth, only my second from the formation.

 

IMG_8206.thumb.JPG.83d56769cdbbfcb5e9b32ea7e80f5c19.JPG

IMG_8208.thumb.JPG.f9455792938bc634746eb5c7c664602d.JPG

IMG_8210.thumb.JPG.e32018b7b81ba6f8899cdd0b7fd418f0.JPG

IMG_8212.thumb.JPG.2b6d4d1aa1deb06ee9597cc73fd8047b.JPG

 

Not quite sure what it is but it is more complete than the last one so I hold out some hope it can be identified. There is also a very nice gastropod I'm currently prepping from the concretions as well as several other unusual things. I'm currently consolidating the heck out of the gastropod outer shell but they can be absurdly difficult to remove with the outer shell intact. I'll post more as I finish them.

 

  • Enjoyed 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did some more prepping and I'm mostly done with this batch.

 

These are the shells from the shale. Not very impressive but again, stuff from the shale is rarer. With the exception of center they appear to be Protocardia subquadrata.

IMG_8267.thumb.JPG.c17e1c3f4dc1e9d4423e16b08fc15308.JPG

Scaphitids of the batch.

IMG_8260.thumb.JPG.a85cd3635a3b96624bbba57043bf469a.JPGIMG_8261.thumb.JPG.9540d289c5314b7aa567faf18934ef7d.JPGIMG_8262.thumb.JPG.29c852c1798af9b393f8e9d8a75942e2.JPGIMG_8264.thumb.JPG.b08aa16a9f1300af0b0d13ac03d20f30.JPGIMG_8265.thumb.JPG.9305b2f2bf72218cd1012f84683171e3.JPG

More Cuspidaria. These aren't reported from North Dakota (at least to my knowledge) but I've found a few others at this site before.

IMG_8270.thumb.JPG.091384d35a352ba13e97404bda6df9af.JPG

Nucula, mostly Nucula cancellata. The lowermost one is Nucula planomarginata. Not much outer shell for these. Note the outer shell at the top to one individual. IMG_8271.thumb.JPG.ab52fd21a8a37ead8eea958f68e14a23.JPG

This one goes to the outer shell pictured above. This problem is common in Fox Hills concretion bivalves and gastropods and Nucula are the worst for this problem among all of them.

IMG_8274.thumb.JPG.ed90101e631ce06ef974f6df01dab043.JPG

A piece of aptychi.

IMG_8273.thumb.JPG.87b5a79f430ab98ad564f071aeca92e1.JPG

A couple more decayed Micrabacia were found. I only find these at this site and they're still rare so any condition is welcome.

IMG_8278.thumb.JPG.495ac41959df5a1cb98bdde7e22d8739.JPG

Graphidula species.

IMG_8277.thumb.JPG.d8185d07ccb72e9fbeab3ff47782d65b.JPG

More Cylichna scitula (left) and Oligopytcha concina. Not great specimens (were missing most outer shell even before preparation) but good enough to prepare.

IMG_8276.thumb.JPG.97021419ec13bb511babe434e3c93bfd.JPG

I'll never get tired of Teleost scales from this site.

IMG_8281.thumb.JPG.22698de7f96836691d6248045347db21.JPG

IMG_8282.thumb.JPG.ba6f2575b6f0176313a2fadf856ad67b.JPG

The nicest Tellinimera scitula of the batch. I left it in the matrix as it is a single valve. IMG_8283.thumb.JPG.924001b4e681ef6207244044c800cf4d.JPG

One of only two Euspira sp. this time. I really tried to keep the outer shell on the spire as it was present but no amount of consolidation did the trick with the hardness of the surrounding rock and how tightly the outer shell adheres. IMG_8288.thumb.JPG.b23275f2af2f2b8780639182bd84af89.JPG

IMG_8289.thumb.JPG.aa8bc4090d06e43e95a26f9dddf9de88.JPG

IMG_8290.thumb.JPG.7fd088dfd8287d4a7b4ce70cc383b5af.JPG

Nuculana sp. and Nuculana scitula with intact outer shell. Easily the most common species from this site.

IMG_8291.thumb.JPG.2ee765aa7da0d4fa55cb7b5c17575d7a.JPG

An indeterminate Margaritinae. Rather flattened and not well preserved for this site.

IMG_8293.thumb.JPG.136c0346687ed2961600a9c3a24899f7.JPG

 

 

  • I found this Informative 1
  • Enjoyed 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/8/2021 at 5:20 AM, Thomas.Dodson said:

I might not have explained that properly. What I meant is that the concretions usually split over the largest ammonites. Since these concretions split over the smaller ammonites it most likely means there aren't any larger ones in the rest of the concretion. The ammonites themselves usually remain intact, which is good because these concretions are usually so hard and so packed with fossils it isn't practical to prep from the outside in.

This is the same situation for the ammonite concretions I get in eastern Wyoming.  These concretions are not conducive to prepping snails and clams with the shell on.  When one splits to reveal a shelly snail, it is a treat.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...