Jump to content

Another Weird Hell Creek Tooth id Nanotyrannus? Dromaeosaur?


jikohr

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone!

 

Here's another little tooth that has me stumped. It has a pinch like a Nano, but the serration density is what I've come to expect from a raptor.
At least I got some really nice shots of the serrations!

CH: 8 mm

CBL: 5.5 mm

CBW: 2 mm

mesial serration density: 6/mm

distal serration density: 4.25/mm

So what do you all think? Nano? Dakotaraptor? Tyrannosaur/Dromaeosaur indet.?

Any insight is appreciated as always!

 

1a.thumb.jpg.94a3da0b7c3f26bd645997d3aa0d59b1.jpg1b.thumb.jpg.e05c5014d1a9914ae3e9dffe86134a81.jpg1c.thumb.jpg.434fd9a038ecdbc58d3cb5fbdf1f14a7.jpg1d.thumb.jpg.ae698c53c864d83564ba93a32caed769.jpg1e.thumb.jpg.8de013735484f6193c2e74fd82972782.jpg1f.thumb.jpg.8ce24fdfe52f2ab020e42a5a0cc319a5.jpg1g.thumb.jpg.1d5330c6a7aab73f9e1f69683165ac56.jpg

Edited by jikohr
rearrange photos
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like dromaeosaur to me. Base and tooth shape seem different from nano.

  • Enjoyed 1

:trex::brokebone: Enthusiastic Fossil Hunter bone_brokerev.pngtrexrev.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was what I thought also at first, but I just want to make sure. Honestly I'm kinda leaning toward Dakotaraptor on it but I'm really hesitant to label anything that. I got one a week ago. I'll be shocked if this is another one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This one is difficult and its small size does not help.  The shape of the denticles and slight mesial twist says Tyrannosaurid while a strong DSDI says Dromaeosaurid.   I dont believe its Dakotaraptor or Acherorapter since a number of characteristics dont work.    

 

I believe there is a good chance there is another Dromaeosaurid in the HC so it might be that.

 

Can you recheck density.

  • Thank You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Troodon said:

This one is difficult and its small size does not help.  The shape of the denticles and slight mesial twist says Tyrannosaurid while a strong DSDI says Dromaeosaurid.   I dont believe its Dakotaraptor or Acherorapter since a number of characteristics dont work.    

 

I believe there is a good chance there is another Dromaeosaurid in the HC so it might be that.

 

Can you recheck density.

Really? Wow, I'm really glad I'm checking! Here's some pics with the serrations next to a mm scale bar. I'll go retake measurements from scratch and get another pic of the mesial carina since the "twist" might be a bit exaggerated in that photo.

small tooth 4a.jpg

small tooth 4b.jpg

small tooth 4c.jpg

  • Enjoyed 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Troodon said:

This one is difficult and its small size does not help.  The shape of the denticles and slight mesial twist says Tyrannosaurid while a strong DSDI says Dromaeosaurid.   I dont believe its Dakotaraptor or Acherorapter since a number of characteristics dont work.    

 

I believe there is a good chance there is another Dromaeosaurid in the HC so it might be that.

 

Can you recheck density.

Oh by the way, I rechecked the serration density and found distal serration density of 5/mm at about 1 mm lower down then where I originally measured.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm surprised the base pinch wasn't a bigger driver of the Tyrannosaurid thinking. It's minor here, but any degree of it typically rules out DR and suggests nano.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your tooth got me interested so I checked my collection to see if I had something similar and found a couple.    Here is one that is in pretty good shape, a bit smaller, but extremely similar.  I'm still leaning toward Nano because of the denticle shape but would not rule out an indeterminate Dromaeosaurid.   The base has a pinch, and its shape, non-rectangular, might just be a function of an immature tooth but don't know.   The CHR and denticle shape do not compare well with Dakotaraptor.   Hard to diagnose teeth this small since we don't know what ontogenetic changes occur other than density.

 

  I've had discussions with Pete Larsen about a 3rd Dromaeosaurid in the HC, so I do plan on showing him this tooth.

 

 

1148395108_Theropodindet2.thumb.jpg.fa09ac98d4fcef88a5a5b3cf0c122b08.jpg

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Troodon said:

Your tooth got me interested so I checked my collection to see if I had something similar and found a couple.    Here is one that is in pretty good shape, a bit smaller, but extremely similar.  I'm still leaning toward Nano because of the denticle shape but would not rule out an indeterminate Dromaeosaurid.   The base has a pinch, and its shape, non-rectangular, might just be a function of an immature tooth but don't know.   The CHR and denticle shape do not compare well with Dakotaraptor.   Hard to diagnose teeth this small since we don't know what ontogenetic changes occur other than density.

 

  I've had discussions with Pete Larsen about a 3rd Dromaeosaurid in the HC, so I do plan on showing him this tooth.

 

 

1148395108_Theropodindet2.thumb.jpg.fa09ac98d4fcef88a5a5b3cf0c122b08.jpg

I haven't done a serration count on this one, but I do have another tiny one that is a Nano if that helps. Complete with rectangular pinched base and a mesial carinae that veers of to the side. I can supply some more data in a little bit, I'm helping my family pack up for a big vacation right now, but anything I can do to help especially if it might be a new discovery!

13.jpg

14.jpg

15.jpg

16.jpg

17.jpg

18.jpg

19.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, I need to talk to Pete about the shape of these bases.  Not typical of what is understood for Nano but yours is clearly one.  Again might be ontogenetic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...