Guns Posted June 26, 2022 Share Posted June 26, 2022 Hello ! Info from seller : Spinosaurid neck vertebra from kem kem . What do you think ? Best regards Guns Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troodon Posted June 26, 2022 Share Posted June 26, 2022 Yes its a vertebra of a Spinosaurid, might even be a Sigilmassasaurus 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guns Posted June 26, 2022 Author Share Posted June 26, 2022 Thank you for the quick response Frank ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guns Posted June 26, 2022 Author Share Posted June 26, 2022 8 minutes ago, Troodon said: Yes its a vertebra of a Spinosaurid, might even be a Sigilmassasaurus What do you think about position of this vert ? ( dorsal or cervical ? ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troodon Posted June 26, 2022 Share Posted June 26, 2022 I would lean towards cervical but the real expert on these is @LordTrilobitelets see what he says. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordTrilobite Posted June 26, 2022 Share Posted June 26, 2022 This is either one of the last cervicals or one of the first dorsals. So cervical 9 or 10. Or dorsal 1 or 2. It does indeed look like Spinosaurid. But I would lean away from Sigilmassasaurus due to the lack of a ventral rugose triangular plateau on the centrum. So, Spinosaurid indet. posterior cervical or anterior dorsal vert. Very nice piece. 1 1 Olof Moleman AKA Lord Trilobite Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troodon Posted June 26, 2022 Share Posted June 26, 2022 1 hour ago, LordTrilobite said: But I would lean away from Sigilmassasaurus I said maybe Sigil because the platform was not as formed as others but closer to these two examples. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doushantuo Posted June 26, 2022 Share Posted June 26, 2022 (edited) Sigilmassasaurus is SpinosauruscretresA reappraisal of African spinosaurines - ScienceDirect.pdf naturally not the article itself,which is subscribed content,which is a pity,of course Edited June 26, 2022 by doushantuo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsaacTheFossilMan Posted June 26, 2022 Share Posted June 26, 2022 I saw this piece go up on sale! It's Sigilmassasaurus aff. brevicollis, (aff. meaning species affinis, or something that looks like this species, but isn't that, perhaps because of indecisive ID, or potentially, a new, undescribed species). ~ Isaac; www.isaactfm.com "Don't move! He can't see us if we don't move!" - Alan Grant Come to the spring that is The Fossil Forum, where the stream of warmth and knowledge never runs dry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsaacTheFossilMan Posted June 26, 2022 Share Posted June 26, 2022 17 minutes ago, doushantuo said: Sigilmassasaurus is SpinosauruscretresA reappraisal of African spinosaurines - ScienceDirect.pdf 336.99 kB · 1 download naturally not the article itself,which is subscribed content,which is a pity,of course Interesting. Not 2 years prior to this, Thomas Arden et al. concluded that it was a valid genus, forming the tribe/clade Spinosaurini within Spinosaurinae. Then Smyth et al. in 2020 showed that they were synonymous, and then, AGAIN(!), McFeeters showed, using new evidence, namely a mid-cervical vertebra belonging to a creature within Spinosaurini, and compared it to the most recent composite of Spinosaurus aegyptiacus, getting unusual results. Rather than fitting within the morphology of S. aegyptiacus, the vertebra showed a confusing mix of traits. If it were to be fitted within S. a., the compact centrum would suggest it to belong in C4, however, the neural arch laminae would suggest C5/6. Even stranger, looking at the hypapophysis, a rounded tuberosity was observed, which is weird, to say the least. It wasn't synonymous with a ventral keel, and has been unknown in any other specimen, giving evidence that it may be a new taxa, after all. And, finally, a non-posterially overhanging extension on the postzygapophysis was present, also unknown in Kem Kem spinosaurid mid-cervicals. A link to this paper can be found here. ~ Isaac; www.isaactfm.com "Don't move! He can't see us if we don't move!" - Alan Grant Come to the spring that is The Fossil Forum, where the stream of warmth and knowledge never runs dry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doushantuo Posted June 26, 2022 Share Posted June 26, 2022 (edited) New mid-cervical vertebral morphotype of Spinosauridae from the Kem Kem Group of Morocco Bradley McFeeters McFeeters, B. (2021). New mid-cervical vertebral morphotype of Spinosauridae from the Kem Kem Group of Morocco. Vertebrate Anatomy Morphology Palaeontology, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.18435/vamp29370 1202215003_McFeeters2021spinosaur.pdf Isaac,it turns out we were simultaneously looking at the same thing Edited June 26, 2022 by doushantuo 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doushantuo Posted June 26, 2022 Share Posted June 26, 2022 (edited) Yoú're barking up the wrong tree ,BTW. edit: in the sense that I am very weary of the pitfalls of dinosaur systematics. I'm too aware that dinosaur taxonomy is in essence parataxonomy,with people throwing synapomorphies at each other like frisbees Edited June 26, 2022 by doushantuo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsaacTheFossilMan Posted June 26, 2022 Share Posted June 26, 2022 (edited) 6 minutes ago, doushantuo said: Isaac,it turns out we were similtaneously looking at the same thing I beat you to it! \ Here's the enigmatic vertebra from McFeeter's study, and here is a standard one: I can't find a better image, unfortunately... Edited June 26, 2022 by IsaacTheFossilMan ~ Isaac; www.isaactfm.com "Don't move! He can't see us if we don't move!" - Alan Grant Come to the spring that is The Fossil Forum, where the stream of warmth and knowledge never runs dry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsaacTheFossilMan Posted June 26, 2022 Share Posted June 26, 2022 2 minutes ago, doushantuo said: Yoú're barking up the wrong tree ,BTW. I don't quite understand what you mean ~ Isaac; www.isaactfm.com "Don't move! He can't see us if we don't move!" - Alan Grant Come to the spring that is The Fossil Forum, where the stream of warmth and knowledge never runs dry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsaacTheFossilMan Posted June 26, 2022 Share Posted June 26, 2022 Found one, from an old thread by @LordTrilobite ~ Isaac; www.isaactfm.com "Don't move! He can't see us if we don't move!" - Alan Grant Come to the spring that is The Fossil Forum, where the stream of warmth and knowledge never runs dry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doushantuo Posted June 26, 2022 Share Posted June 26, 2022 (edited) What i mean is that the finer taxonomical details are to me, probably the least interesting part of dinosaur paleobiology Nice to see the inferior oolite looks to be your your stomping ground,btw Edited June 26, 2022 by doushantuo 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doushantuo Posted June 26, 2022 Share Posted June 26, 2022 (edited) soem of you may like: New spinosaurids from the Wessex Formation (Early Cretaceous,UK) and the European origins of Spinosauridae Chris T. Barker, David W. E. Hone, Darren Naish, Andrea Cau, Jeremy A. F. Lockwood, Brian Foster, Claire E. Clarkin, Philipp Schneider & Neil J. Gostling s41598-021-97870-8.pdf Edited June 26, 2022 by doushantuo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsaacTheFossilMan Posted June 26, 2022 Share Posted June 26, 2022 5 minutes ago, doushantuo said: What i mean is that the finer taxonomical details are to me, probably the least interesting part of dinosaur paleobiology Nice to see the inferior oolite looks to be your your stomping ground,btw I can understand that! I love looking into the teeny tiny details, of course, coming from a more micro side... Indeed, the inferior oolite is where I belong! Cheers bud! What's your forte? ~ Isaac; www.isaactfm.com "Don't move! He can't see us if we don't move!" - Alan Grant Come to the spring that is The Fossil Forum, where the stream of warmth and knowledge never runs dry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doushantuo Posted June 26, 2022 Share Posted June 26, 2022 (edited) You really want to know? edit: the answer might surprise you Edited June 26, 2022 by doushantuo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsaacTheFossilMan Posted June 26, 2022 Share Posted June 26, 2022 8 minutes ago, doushantuo said: You really want to know? edit: the answer might surprise you Yeah! ~ Isaac; www.isaactfm.com "Don't move! He can't see us if we don't move!" - Alan Grant Come to the spring that is The Fossil Forum, where the stream of warmth and knowledge never runs dry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doushantuo Posted June 26, 2022 Share Posted June 26, 2022 earth science Period ,fullstop,end of sentence. In order to understand Earth , I read everything. Please take that literally. Look at how and what i post,and you will understand. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsaacTheFossilMan Posted June 26, 2022 Share Posted June 26, 2022 9 minutes ago, doushantuo said: earth science Period ,fullstop,end of sentence. In order to understand Earth , I read everything. Please take that literally. Look at how and what i post,and you will understand. Nice! I come from a physics, maths and computer science background, but will be studying a Masters in palaeontology soon! ~ Isaac; www.isaactfm.com "Don't move! He can't see us if we don't move!" - Alan Grant Come to the spring that is The Fossil Forum, where the stream of warmth and knowledge never runs dry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troodon Posted June 26, 2022 Share Posted June 26, 2022 I always enjoy reading new papers on Spinosaurids to see if those from Morocco are discussed and got a chuckle when I first read it. Barker et al. paper figure 7 shows multiple Spinosaurinae in Africa none of which are S. aegyptiacus. Makes this statement "Moreover, a better understanding of North African spinosaurine relationships requires the discovery of more complete individuals regardless." Makes sense, so identification of isolated material can be very problematic. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doushantuo Posted June 26, 2022 Share Posted June 26, 2022 yeah ,the mixture of cladistics and vicariance biogeography has me in stitches everytime,as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now