Jump to content

Fossil sponge garden?


G Mac

Recommended Posts

  • New Members

These inclusions are in Broome WA Australia sandstone possibly just higher than the famous dino-foot prints. The shape, relative thickness of wall and lumen, the layout and spacing on the platform,  and some of the detail on them, all remind me of sponges. Can anyone confirm. If so there is about an acre of them! The longer ones all lie prone or are aligned in the same direction. A fossil sponge garden or cruel geological hoax? 

IMG_7120.JPG

IMG_7123.JPG

IMG_7124.JPG

IMG_7125.JPG

IMG_7131.JPG

IMG_7063.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They could be sponges, but I think they are concretions.

Particularly in the third picture there is clear layered bands, not very sponge like (in My opinion).

  • I found this Informative 1

Darwin said: " Man sprang from monkeys."

Will Rogers said: " Some of them didn't spring far enough."

 

My Fossil collection - My Mineral collection

My favorite thread on TFF.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure not a geological hoax ;). Its something quite spectacular and beautyfull, whatever it is.

Are these things somewhat rusty? In other photos, they appear green - are there algae on them? Is the area wet in some pictures?

And: In the last photo, it seems that one ot these things is missing at the right edge of the photo - ??

Franz Bernhard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would lean towards some really weird concretions, but they could possibly be stromatolites? 

Very interesting. :)

  • I found this Informative 1

Life's Good!

Tortoise Friend.

MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png.a47e14d65deb3f8b242019b3a81d8160-1.png.60b8b8c07f6fa194511f8b7cfb7cc190.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think, they might be close to the Thalassinoides XL mounds / openings shown below.

 

IMG_7063.JPG.f871f711b41d2e713983474a88191212.thumb.JPG.4c8b97525dca084f0eaad227af6ef61a.JPG5b5e49e603ee8_Fig.6.C.jpg.7c162c09dd5986f670ecd003d849df9c.jpg

Fig. 6. Sedimentary facies. (C) Muddy sands (facies C).

 

5b5e49e3aa0c4_Fig.8.B.thumb.jpg.9368c0bcb92fb8af0ae9a4df85777f5c.jpg

Fig. 8. Thalassinoides XL, as manifested by sediment mounds. (B) A barrier-island (arrowed) separates the turbulent fore-barrier from the quieter back-barrier. Numerous sediment mounds characterize the back-barrier, here photographed at low tide. Quadrat for scale.

 

excerpts from A. Baucon & F. Felletti. 2013. The IchnoGIS method: Network science and geostatistics in ichnology. Theory and application (Grado lagoon, Italy). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 375: 83-111

 

  • I found this Informative 2

" We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. "

Thomas Mann

My Library

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • New Members

Thank you for your comments.  I will follow up as best I can to get an answer. If anyone knows who might be interested in a sample please let me know. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • New Members

I’m the site is below the high tide line.  I am think exit mounds looks most likely. 

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, G Mac said:

I’m the site is below the high tide line.  I am think exit mounds looks most likely. 

I disagree with the objects being burrow exit  mounds

There is a stratification visible in Your pictures that would not be consistent with a "piled" structure.

  • I found this Informative 1

Darwin said: " Man sprang from monkeys."

Will Rogers said: " Some of them didn't spring far enough."

 

My Fossil collection - My Mineral collection

My favorite thread on TFF.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, ynot said:

I disagree with the objects being burrow exit  mounds

There is a stratification visible in Your pictures that would not be consistent with a "piled" structure.

I agree; the shape of many of those objects (red arrows) does not fit with the hypothesis;
moreover, if the one indicated by the yellow arrow is part of the whole, it does not even have an opening.

 

InkedInkedIMG_7063.thumb.JPG.88271dabc5f93a3072723a3717781b3f (2)_LI.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, supertramp said:

I agree; the shape of many of those objects (red arrows) does not fit with the hypothesis;

moreover, if the one indicated by the yellow arrow is part of the whole, it does not even have an opening.

 

InkedInkedIMG_7063.thumb.JPG.88271dabc5f93a3072723a3717781b3f (2)_LI.jpg

That's because the opening was stepped on by a theropod. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, ynot said:

I disagree with the objects being burrow exit  mounds

There is a stratification visible in Your pictures that would not be consistent with a "piled" structure.

 

@ynot, If they were burrow exit mounds, the "stratification" could be from the tide coming in then going out, eroding the mound a little each time and leaving a horizontal pattern  to the mound. Plausible??????

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, minnbuckeye said:

 

@ynot, If they were burrow exit mounds, the "stratification" could be from the tide coming in then going out, eroding the mound a little each time and leaving a horizontal pattern  to the mound. Plausible??????

Would take a very small tide, with little turbulence.

Also, these had to be mineralized while buried.

Darwin said: " Man sprang from monkeys."

Will Rogers said: " Some of them didn't spring far enough."

 

My Fossil collection - My Mineral collection

My favorite thread on TFF.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, G Mac said:

I’m the site is below the high tide line.

On 29.7.2018 at 3:26 PM, G Mac said:

possibly just higher than the famous dino-foot prints

?? - I am really confused. Are these things very old (fossils) or are they recent? Maybe I have missed something...

Franz Bernhard

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, FranzBernhard said:

?? - I am really confused. Are these things very old (fossils) or are they recent? Maybe I have missed something...

Franz Bernhard

 

Yes.. (this way I'm only 1/2 wrong). :muahaha:

Accomplishing the impossible means only that the boss will add it to your regular duties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, daves64 said:

Yes.. (this way I'm only 1/2 wrong).

I am the optimist here: This way I would be 1/2 right... ;)

Franz Bernhard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/29/2018 at 4:15 PM, abyssunder said:

I think, they might be close to the Thalassinoides XL mounds /

If this were right, wouldn't there be collapsed (red) and partially collapsed (yellow) burrows also?

5b5e49e603ee8_Fig.6.C.jpg.7c162c09dd5986f670ecd003d849df9c.jpg.56de54a19388d366fd6dae9298c8cd7e.jpg

 

Darwin said: " Man sprang from monkeys."

Will Rogers said: " Some of them didn't spring far enough."

 

My Fossil collection - My Mineral collection

My favorite thread on TFF.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi, your specimen make me think about paramoudras like the ones we can find in the North West of Spain in the site of Jaizkibel, Basque country.

Those concretions are the fossils of the activity of micro-organisms that digged galleries in the marine soil during the sedimentation. Those perforations must have acted as canals during the diagenesis, permitting the circulation of water and so, the precipitation of silice at their periphery.

 

5b65c5bcd495f_0810161.jpg.3cbec0e79f2130ef8821523327fa35de.jpg5b65c5c00aa01_ob_3af7f8_img-10211.jpg.fc9f1ed43696c2078f88ad4682e545b1.jpg5b65c5c365680_11.canal1.jpg.7ee4a0386abc805f6f1ca7314bc331f4.jpg5b65c5c715fc1_0804671.jpg.7ced80b31893ccf3358ba2d0aa671c60.jpg5b65c5ca5a2f2_075_paramoudras1.jpg.a05d1546c4a5917f804769b7c910fb2a.jpg5b65c5cff413e_Paramoudras1281.thumb.jpg.f7a698f489c83fcb72540ea143ec5f40.jpg

  • I found this Informative 3

theme-celtique.png.bbc4d5765974b5daba0607d157eecfed.png.7c09081f292875c94595c562a862958c.png

"On ne voit bien que par le coeur, l'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux." (Antoine de Saint-Exupéry)

"We only well see with the heart, the essential is invisible for the eyes."

 

In memory of Doren

photo-thumb-12286.jpg.878620deab804c0e4e53f3eab4625b4c.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, ynot said:

If this were right, wouldn't there be collapsed (red) and partially collapsed (yellow) burrows also?

They might be.

" We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. "

Thomas Mann

My Library

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...